Drug test feasibility in a general population household survey

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 237-250

  Fendrich, Michael ^a   Johnson, Timothy P ^a   Wislar, Joseph S ^a   Hubbell, Amy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug testing; Epidemiology; Survey research methods

Indexed keywords

ILLICIT DRUG;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; COMPUTER; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; HAIR; HEALTH SURVEY; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; MALE; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SALIVA; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES; URINE;

EID: 1242314702     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AAPOR (American Association for Public Opinion Research), 2000. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. AAPOR, Ann Arbor, MI.
2. Adler, A., 1964. Social Interest: A Challenge to Mankind. Capricorn, New York.
3. Brehm J.W., Cole H. Effect of a favor which reduces freedom. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 3:1966;420-426.
4. Bryant B.E. Respondent selection in a time of changing household composition. J. Marketing Res. 12:1975;129-135.
5. Church A.H. Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: a metha-analysis. Public Opin. Q. 57:1993;62-79.
6. Cialdini, R.B., 1984. Influence: The New Psychology of Modern Persuasion. Quill, New York.
7. Colon H.M., Robles R.R., Sahai H. The validity of drug use self-reports among hard core drug users in a household survey in Puerto Rico: comparison of survey responses of cocaine and heroin use with hair tests. Drug Alcohol Depend. 67:2002;269-279.
8. Colon H.M., Robles R.R., Sahai H. The validity of drug use responses in a household survey in Puerto Rico: comparison of survey responses of cocaine and heroin use with hair tests. Int. J. Epidemiol. 30:2001;1042-1049.
9. Cone, E.J., 1997. New developments in biological measures of drug prevalence. In: Harrison, L., Hughes, A. (Eds.), The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates. NIDA Research Monograph 167, NIH Publication No. 97-4147. US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD.
10. Crandall J.E. A scale for social interest. J. Individual Psychol. 31:1975;187-195.
11. Department of Health and Human Services, 2001. Opioid drugs in maintenance and detoxification treatment of opiate addiction; final rule. Federal Register 66 (11), 4075-4102.
12. Fendrich M., Johnson T., Sudman S., Wislar J.S., Spiehler V. The validity of drug use reporting in a high risk community sample. A comparison of cocaine and heroin survey reports with hair tests. Am. J. Epidemiol. 149:1999a;955-962.
13. Fendrich, M., Johnson, T., Wislar, J.S., Sudman, S., 1999b. The feasibility of hair testing in a household survey on drug abuse. In: Mieczkowski, T. (Ed.), Drug Testing Technology: Assessment of Field Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
14. Fendrich M., Miller P.V. Pathways and obstacles in drug use measurement: editors' introduction. J. Drug Issues. 30:2000;1-8.
15. Fendrich M., Kim J. Multivariate analysis of retest artifact in the national longitudinal survey of youth drug use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 62:2001;239-253.
16. Fendrich M., Rosenbaum D.P. Recanting of substance use reports in a longitudinal prevention study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 70:2003;241-253.
17. Feucht T., Stephens R.C., Walker M.L. Drug use among juvenile arrestees: a comparison of self-report, urinalysis and hair assay. J. Drug Issues. 24:1994;99-116.
18. Graziano, W.G., Eisenberg, N., 1997. Agreeableness: a dimension of personality. In: Hogan, R., Johnson, J., Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology. Academic Press, New York.
19. Greenberg E.R. Drug testing now standard practice. Hrfocus. 73:1996;24.
20. Groves R.M., Cialdini R.B., Couper M.P. Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opin. Q. 56:1992;475-495.
21. Groves, R.M., Couper, M.P., 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. Wiley, New York.
22. Groves R.M., Singer E., Corning A. Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation. Public Opin. Q. 64:2001;299-308.
23. Hartwell, T.D., Steele, P.D., French, M.T., Rodman, N.F., 1996. Prevalence of drug testing in the workplace. Monthly Labor Rev. 35-42.
24. Hedeker D., Gibbons R.D. MIXOR: a computer program for mixed effects ordinal regression analysis. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 49:1996;157-176.
25. Jehanli A., Brannan S., Moore L., Spiehler V. Blind trials of an onsite saliva drug test. J. Forensic Sci. 46:2001;206-212.
26. Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., 2001. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2000: College Students and Adults Ages 19-40, vol. II. NIH Publication No. 01-4925. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD.
27. Kulka, R.A., 1994. The use of incentives to survey 'hard-to-reach' respondents: a brief review of empirical research and current research practice. Paper presented at the Seminar on New Directions in Statistical Methodology, Bethesda, MD.
28. Levy, P.S., Lemeshow, S., 1991. Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. Wiley, New York.
29. Magura S., Kang S. The validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations. A meta-analytic review. Substance Use Misuse. 3:1996;1131-1153.
30. Mieczkowski T., Barzelay D., Gropper B., Wish E. Concordance of three measures of cocaine use in an arrestee population: hair, urine, and self-report. J. Psychoactive Drugs. 23:1991;241-249.
31. National Center for Health Statistics, 1994. Plan and operation of the third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988-1994. DHHS Publication No. PHS 94-1308, Series 1, No. 32. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.
32. Office of Applied Studies, 1999. National household survey on drug abuse: main findings 1997. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
33. Patrick D., Cheadle A., Thompson D.C., Diehr P., Koepsell T., Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Public Health. 84:1994;1086-1093.
34. Richardson, J., Fendrich, M., Johnson, T.P., 2003. Neighborhood effects on drug reporting. Addiction 98, 1705-1712.
35. Shettle C., Mooney G. Monetary incentives in US government surveys. J. Official Stat. 15:1999;231-250.
36. Singer E., Van Hoewyk J.V., Gebler N., Raghunathan T., McGonagle K. The effect of incentives on response rates in interviewer-mediated surveys. J. Official Stat. 15:1999;217-230.
37. StataCorp, 2002. Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. Stata Corporation, College Station, TX.
38. Wish E., Gray T., Sushinsky J., Yacoubian G., Fitzgerald N. An experiment to enhance the reporting of drug use by arrestees. J. Drug Issues. 30:2000;55-76.
39. Wolff K., Farrell M., Marsden J., Montiero M.G., Ali R., Welch S., Strang J. A review of biological indicators of illicit drug use, practical considerations and clinical usefulness. Addiction. 94:1999;1279-1298.