Recanting of substance use reports in a longitudinal prevention study

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 241-253

  Fendrich, Michael ^a   Rosenbaum, Dennis P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescence; Drug abuse; Epidemiology; Inconsistency; Longitudinal research; Survey methods

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; COCAINE;

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ABUSE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIFESPAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; RACE DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES;

CANNABIS SATIVA;

EID: 0038325705     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00010-3     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bailey S.L., Flewelling R.L., Rachal J.V. The characterization of inconsistencies in self-reports of alcohol and marijuana use in a longitudinal study of adolescents. J. Stud. Alcohol. 53:1992;636-647.
2. Botvin G.J., Baker E., Duesenbury L., Botvin E.M., Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 273:1995;1106-1112.
3. Bradburn N.M., Sudman S., et al. Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design. 1979;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
4. Clayton R.R., Cattarello A.M., Johnstone B.M. The effectiveness of drug abuse resistance education (project DARE): five year follow-up results. Prev. Med. 25:1996;307-318.
5. Ellickson P., Bell R.M. Challenges to social experiments: a drug prevention example. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 29:1992;79-101.
6. Fendrich M., Johnson T.P. Examining prevalence differences in three national surveys of youth: impact of consent procedures, mode, and editing rules. J. Drug Issues. 31:2001;615-642.
7. Fendrich M., Johnson T.P., Sudman S., Wislar J.S., Spiehler V. Validity of drug use reporting in a high-risk community sample: a comparison of cocaine and heroin survey reports with hair tests. Am. J. Epidemiol. 149:1999;955-961.
8. Fendrich M., Kim J. Multivariate analysis of retest artifact in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth drug use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 62:2001;239-253.
9. Fendrich M., Mackesy-Amiti M.E. Decreased drug reporting in a cross-sectional student drug use survey. J. Subst. Abuse. 11:2000;161-172.
10. Fendrich M., Vaughn C.M. Diminished lifetime substance use over time: an inquiry into differential underreporting. Public Opin. Q. 58:1994;96-123.
11. Fendrich M., Xu Y. The validity of drug use reports from juvenile arrestees. Int. J. Addict. 29:1994;971-985.
12. Gfroerer J., Wright D., Kopstein A. Prevalence of youth substance use: the impact of methodological differences between two national surveys. Drug Alcohol Depend. 47:1997;19-30.
13. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 1989;Wiley, New York.
14. Johnson, T.P., Bowman, P.J. Cross-cultural sources of measurement error in substance use surveys. Subst. Use Misuse, in press.
15. Johnson T.P., Mott J.A. The reliability of self-reported age of onset of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug use. Addiction. 96:2001;1187-1198.
16. Johnston L.D., Bachman J.G., O'Malley P.M. Monitoring the Future: Questionnaire Responses from the Nation's High School Seniors 1995. 1997;Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI.
17. Lauritsen J.L. The age-crime debate: assessing the limits of longitudinal self-report data. Soc. Forces. 76:1998;1-29.
18. Lessler J.T., Caspar R.A., Penne M.A., Barker P.R. Developing computer assisted interviewing (CAI) for the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. J. Drug Issues. 30:2000;9-34.
19. Mensch B.S., Kandel D.B. Underreporting of substance use in a national longitudinal youth cohort: individual and interviewer effects. Public Opin. Q. 52:1988;100-124.
20. Office of Applied Studies, 1999. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1997. Department of Health and Human Services, Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; Rockville, MD.
21. O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G., Johnston L.D. Reliability and consistency of self-reports of drug use. Int. J. Addict. 18:1983;805-824.
22. Pederson W. Reliability of drug use responses in a longitudinal study. Scand. J. Psychol. 31:1990;28-33.
23. Pentz M.A. Comparative effects of community-based drug abuse prevention. Baer J.S., Marlatt G.A., McMahon R.J. Addictive Behaviors Across the Life Span: Prevention, Treatment and Policy Issues. 1993;Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
24. Ringwalt C.R., Ennett S.T., Holt K.D. An outcome evaluation of project DARE (drug abuse resistance education). Health Educ. Res. 6:1991;327-337.
25. Rosenbaum D.P., Flewelling R.L., Bailey S.L., Ringwalt C.L., Wilkenson D.L. Cops in the classroom: a longitudinal evaluation of drug abuse resistance education (DARE). J. Res. Crime Delinq. 31:1994;3-31.
26. Rosenbaum D.P., Hanson G.S. Assessing the effects of school-based drug education: a six year multilevel analysis of project DARE. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 35:1998;381-412.
27. Siddiqui O., Mott J.A., Anderson T.L., Flay B.R. Characteristics of inconsistent respondents who have 'ever used' drugs in a school-based sample. Subst. Use Misuse. 34:1999;269-295.
28. Single E., Kandel D., Johnson B.D. The reliability and validity of drug use responses in a large scale longitudinal survey. J. Drug Issues. 5:1975;426-443.
29. StataCorp, 1999. STATA Statistical Software: Release 6.0. Stata Corporation; College Station, TX.
30. Sudman S., Bradburn N., Schwarz N. Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. 1996;Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
31. Thornberry, T.P., Krohn, M.D., 2000. The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. In: Duffee, D., McDowall, D., Ostrom, B., Crutchfield, R.D., Mastrofski, S.D., Mazerolle, L.G. (Eds.), Measurement and Analysis of Crime. vol. 4, pp. 33-81.