Isolation and selection of ionophore-tolerant Eimeria precocious lines: E. tenella, E. maxima and E. acervulina

Veterinary Parasitology

Volumn 119, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 261-276

  Li, G Q ^a   Kanu, S ^a   Xiang, F Y ^a   Xiao, S M ^a   Zhang, L ^a   Chen, H W ^a   Ye, H J ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chicken; China; Eimeria spp.; Ionophore tolerant; Ionophore toleration; Precocious line

Indexed keywords

IONOPHORE; LASALOCID; LASOLACID; MADURAMICIN; MONENSIN; SALINOMYCIN; SEMDURAMICIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHICKEN; COCCIDIOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ACTIVITY; DRUG SENSITIVITY; EIMERIA; EIMERIA ACERVULINA; EIMERIA MAXIMA; EIMERIA TENELLA; NONHUMAN; OOCYST; PATHOGENICITY; PROPHYLAXIS; WEIGHT GAIN;

ACERVULINA; EIMERIA; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 1242306484     PISSN: 03044017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chapman H.D. Eimeria tenella: stability of resistance to halofuginone, dequinate and arprinocid in the chicken. Res. Vet. Sci. 40:1986;139-140.
2. Chapman H.D. Biochemical, genetics and applied aspects of drug resistance in Eimeria parasites of the fowl. Avian Pathol. 28:1997;221-224.
3. Danforth, H.D., 2000. Increase in anticoccidial sensitivity seen after field trial studies with five oocysts vaccination of partially drug-resistant strains of avian Eimeria species. In: Proceedings of the 75th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Parasitologists and the 53rd Annual Meeting of Protozoologists, p. 90.
4. Jeffers J.K. Reduction of anticoccidial drug resistance by massive introduction of drug sensitive coccidian. Avian Dis. 20:1976;649-653.
5. Jeffers, J.K., 1989. Anticoccidial drug resistance: a review with emphasis on the polyether ionophores. In: Yvore, P. (Ed.), Coccidia and Intestinal Coccidiomorphs. INRA, Paris, pp. 295-308.
6. Johnson J., Reid W.M. Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp. Parasitol. 28:1970;30-36.
7. Long, P.L., 1971. Maintenance of intestinal protozoa in vivo with particular reference to Eimeria and Histosomonas. In: Taylor, A.E.R., Muller, R. (Eds.), Isolation and Maintenance of Parasites In Vivo. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford, pp. 65-75.
8. Long P.L. Eimeria tenella: reproduction, pathogenicity and immunogenicity of a strain maintained in chick embryos by serial passage. J. Comp. Pathol. 82:1972;429-437.
9. McDougald L.R. Anticoccidial drug resistance in Southern United States: polyether ionophorous drugs. Avian Dis. 25:1981;600-609.
10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Company Ltd., 1998. The control of coccidiosis. MSD Technical Booklet, pp. 2-4.
11. Reid, W.M., Long, P.L., McDougald, L.R., 1984. Coccidiosis. In: Hofstad, M.S., Barnes, H.J., Calnek, B.W., Reid, W.M., Yoder Jr., H W. (Eds.), Diseases of Poultry, 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp. 692-717.
12. Schetters, T.P.M., Janssen, H.A.J.M., Vermeulen, A.N., 1999. A new vaccination concept against coccidiosis in poultry. World Poul. Special Supplement, pp. 26-27.
13. Shirley M.W., Bushell A.C., Bushell J.E., McDonald V., Roberts B. A live vaccine for the control of coccidiosis: trials in broiler breeders and replacement layer flocks in the United Kingdom. Vet. Rec. 137:1995;453-457.
14. Vermeulen A.N., Schaap D.C., Schetters T.P.M. Control of coccidiosis in chicken by vaccination. Vet. Parasitol. 100:2001;13-20.
15. Williams R.B. The mode of action of anticoccidial quinolones (6-decyloxy-4-hydroxyquinoline-3-carboxylates) in chickens. Int. J. Parasitol. 27:1997;101-111.
16. Williams R.B., Cathchpole J. A new protocol for challenge test to assess the efficacy of live anticoccidial vaccines for chickens. Vaccine. 18:2000;1178-1185.
17. Zeng M., Hu Z. The sensitivities of Eimeria tenella to three polyether ionophore antibiotics. Chin. J. Vet. Sci. 16:1996;390-393.
18. Zhou R., Nie K., Wang J. The sensitivity test of Eimeria tenella to four anticoccidial drugs. J. Sichuan Inst. Anim. Hus. Vet. Med. 14(2):2000;20-23.