Emotional reactions to learning in cattle

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 85, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 203-213

  Hagen, Kristin ^a,b   Broom, Donald M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Institute fur Biologie   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cattle; Expressive behaviour; Operant learning; Reinforcer

Indexed keywords

CATTLE; LEARNING;

ANIMALIA; BOS TAURUS;

EID: 1242277712     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bermúdez, J.L., 1995. Ecological perception and the notion of a nonconceptual point of view. In: Bermúdez, J.L., Marcel, A., Eilan, N. (Eds.), The Body and the Self. MIT Press, London, pp. 153-174.
2. Bermúdez, J.L., 1998. The Paradox of Self-consciousness. MIT Press, London.
3. Church R.M. Yoked control designs for assessment of contingency. Behav. Brain Sci. 11:1988;451-452.
4. Church, R.M., 1989. The yoked control design. In: Trevor, A., Nilsson, L.G. (Eds.), Aversion, Avoidance, and Anxiety: Perspectives on Aversively Motivated Behaviour. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp. 403-415.
5. Damasio, A., 2000. The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. Vintage, London.
6. De Veer M.W., Van den Bos R. A critical review of methodology and interpretation of mirror self-recognition research in nonhuman primates. Anim. Behav. 58:1999;459-468.
7. Dickinson A., Balleine B. Motivational control of goal-directed action. Anim. Learn. Behav. 22:1994;1-18.
8. Drugan R.C., Basile A.S., Ha J.H., Healy D., Ferland R.J. Analysis of the importance of controllable versus uncontrollable stress on subsequent behavioral and physiological functioning. Brain Res. Protoc. 2:1997;69-74.
9. Hagen K., Broom D.M. Cattle discriminate between individual familiar herd members in a learning experiment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 82:2003;13-28.
10. Ihaka R., Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5:1996;299-314.
11. Kiley-Worthington, M., Randle, H., 1998. Animal educational psychology: a comparative study of teaching four mammals of different species. Anim. Cogn. Training 013b.
12. Langbein, J., Nürnberg, G., Manteuffel, G., 2003. Telemetric measurement of heart rate and heart rate variability for evaluating psychological stress induced by visual discrimination learning in dwarf goats. In: Cox, S. (Ed.), Precision Livestock Farming. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp. 105-111.
13. Marten K., Psarakos S. Using self-view television to distinguish between self-examination and social behavior in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Conscious. Cogn. 4:1995;205-225.
14. Mitchell R.W. Kinesthetic-visual matching and the self-concept as explanations of mirror-self-recognition. J. Theor. Soc. Behav. 27:1997;17-39.
15. Neisser U. Two perceptually given aspects of the self and their development. Dev. Rev. 11:1991;197-209.
16. Neisser, U., 1997. The roots of self-knowledge: perceiving self, it, and thou. In: Snodgrass, J.G., Thompson, R.L. (Eds.), The Self Across Psychology: Self-recognition, Self-awareness, and the Self Concept. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 19-33. New York Academy of Sciences, New York.
17. Rochat P., Hespos S.J. Differential rooting response by neonates: evidence for an early sense of self. Early Dev. Parenting. 6:1997;105-112.
18. Rochat P., Goubet N. Connaissance implicite du corps au debut de la vie. Enfance. 52:2000;275-285.
19. Shillito D.J., Gallup G.G., Beck B.B. Factors affecting mirror behaviour in western lowland gorillas, Gorilla gorilla. Anim. Behav. 57:1999;999-1004.
20. Siegel, S., Castellan, N.J., 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
21. Swartz, K.B., Sarauw, D., Evans, S., 1999. Comparative aspects of mirror self-recognition in great apes. In: Parker, S.T., Mitchell, R.W. (Eds.), The Mentalities of Gorillas and Orangutans: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 283-294.