Saccharin stimulates the "deterrent" cell in the blowfly: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 637-646

  Liscia, A ^a   Masala, C ^a   Crnjar, R ^a   Sollai, G ^a   Solari, P ^a  

^a Sez Microbiologia   (Italy)

Author keywords

Behavior; Bitter; Blowfly; Electrophysiology; Na saccharin; Sugar; Sweet; Taste

Indexed keywords

AMILORIDE; DENATONIUM BENZOATE; FRUCTOSE; SACCHARIN SODIUM; SUCROSE; SUGAR;

ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE RADIATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BITTER TASTE; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FLY; INGESTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOPHORMIA TERRAENOVAE; REACTIVE INHIBITION; SPIKE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SWEETNESS; TASTE; TASTE PREFERENCE;

EID: 1242269800     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Dethier V.G. The Hungry Fly. 1976;489 Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (MA).
2. Smith J.J.B., Mitchell B.K., Rolseth B.M., Whitehead A.T., Albert P.J. SAPID tools: microcomputer programs for analysis of multi-unit nerve recordings. Chem. Senses. 13:1990;253-270.
3. Liscia A., Solari P., Majone R., Crnjar R. Amiloride high- and low-sensitivity, as well as insensitive sites in the blowfly: implications for sugar, water and anion taste reception mechanisms. Prim. Sens. Neuron. 3:1998;49-59.
4. Steinardt R.A. Cation and anion stimulation of electrolyte receptors of the blowfly, Phormia regina. Am. Zool. 5:1965;651.
5. Dethier V.G., Hanson F.E. Electrophysiological responses of the blowfly to sodium salts and fatty acids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 60:1968;1269-1303.
6. Liscia A., Solari P. Bitter, taste recognition in the blowfly: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Physiol. Behav. 70:2000;61-65.
7. Rader C.P., Tihanyi S.G., Zienty F.B. A study of the true taste of saccharin. J. Food Sci. 32:1967;357-360.
8. Caicedo A., Roper S.D. Taste receptor cells that discriminate between bitter stimuli. Science. 291:2001;1557-1560.
9. + receptor mechanisms. Chem. Senses. 6:1994;197-214.
10. Schiffman S.S., Gatlin L.A., Sattely-Miller E.A., Graham B.G., Heiman S.A., Stagner W.C., et al. The effect of sweeteners on bitter taste in young and elderly subjects. Brain Res. Bull. 35(3):1994;189-204.
11. Hodgson E.S., Lettvin J.Y., Roeder K.D. Physiology of primary chemoreceptor unit. Science. 122:1955;417-418.
12. Liscia A., Solari P., Majone R., Tomassini Barbarossa I., Crnjar R. Taste reception mechanism in the blowfly: evidence of amiloride-sensitive and insensitive receptor sites. Physiol. Behav. 62:1997;875-879.
13. Wilczek M. The distribution and neuroanatomy of the labellar sense organ of the blowfly Phormia regina Meigen. J. Morphol. 122:1965;175-201.
14. Dethier V.G., Bowdan E. The effects of alkaloids on sugar receptors and the feeding behaviour of the blowfly. Physiol. Entomol. 14:1989;127-136.
15. Dethier V.G., Bowdan E. Effects of alkaloids on feeding by Phormia regina confirm the critical role of sensory inhibition. Physiol. Entomol. 17:1992;325-330.
16. Li C.-S., Smith D.V. Mutual inhibition between sucrose and quinine or denatonium in cells of the hamster solitary nucleus. Chem. Senses. 21:1996;632.
17. DeSimone J.A. Focus on "rapid entry of bitter and sweet tastants into liposomes and taste cells: implications for signal transduction" Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 278:2000;C13-C16.
18. Peri I., Mamrud-Brains H., Rodin S., Krizhanovsky V., Shai Y., Nir S., et al. Rapid entry of bitter and sweet tastant into liposomes and taste cells: implications for signal transduction. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 278:2000;C17-C25.
19. Schiffman S.S., Booth B.J., Losee M.L., Pecore S.D., Warwick Z.S. Bitterness of sweetners as a function of concentration. Brain Res. Bull. 36(5):1995;505-513.
20. Kennedy L.M., Halpern B.P. A biphasic model for action of the gymnemic acids and ziziphins on taste receptor cell membranes. Chem. Senses. 5:1980;149-157.
21. Kolodny D.E., Kennedy L.M. A model system for receptor cell studies with the taste modifier, hodulcin. Chem. Senses. 13:1988;545-557.
22. Flaherty C.F., Mitchell C. Absolute and relative rewarding properties of fructose, glucose, and saccharin mixtures as reflected in anticipatory contrast. Physiol. Behav. 66:1999;841-853.
23. Glendinning I.J., Hills T.T. Electrophysiological evidence for two transduction pathways within a bitter-sensitive taste receptor. J. Neurophysiol. 78:1997;734-745.
24. 3 and α-gustducin-dependent fall in cyclic nucleotides. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 280:2001;C742-C751.
25. Chandrashekar J., Mueller K.L., Hoon M.A., Adler E., Feng L., Guo W., et al. T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors. Cell. 100:2000;703-711.
26. Adler E., Hoon M.A., Mueller K.L., Chandresheker J., Ryba N.J.P., Zuker C.S. A novel family of mammalian taste receptors. Cell. 100:2000;693-702.
27. Zhang Y., Hoon M.A., Chandreshekar J., Mueller K.L., Cook B., Wu D., et al. Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Cell. 112:2003;293-301.
28. Wieczorek H., Koppl R. Effect of sugar on the labellar water receptor of the fly. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 126:1978;131-136.
29. Wieczorek H., Shimada I., Hopperdietzel C. Treatment with pronase uncouples water and sugar reception in the labellar water receptor of the blowfly. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 163:1988;413-419.
30. Liscia A., Solari P., Crnjar R. Effects of amiloride and W-7 on the chemoreception of NaCl and KCl in the blowfly: implications for the salt quality. Sens. Neuron. 3(2):2000;119-125.
31. Evans D.R., De Mellon F. Electrophysiological studies of a water receptor associated with the taste sensilla of the blowfly. J. Gen. Physiol. 45:1962;487-500.
32. Evans D.R., De Mellon F. Stimulation of a primary taste receptor by salt. J. Gen. Physiol. 45:1962;651-661.
33. Rees C.J.C. The primary process of reception in the type 3 ("water") receptor cell of the fly, Protophormia terranovae. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B. 174:1970;469-490.
34. Rees C.J.C. Responses of same sensory cells probably associated with the detection of water. Schneider D. IV International Symposium of Olfaction and Taste (Starnberg, 1971). 1972;88-94 Wiss, Verlagsges, Stuttgart.