Radiopacity of resin-based materials measured in film radiographs and storage phosphor plate (Digora)

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 677-684

  Sabbagh, J ^a   Vreven, J ^b   Leloup, G ^b,c  

^a SAINT JOSEPH UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c NONE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENAMEL; IMAGE PROCESSING; OPTICAL DENSITY; RADIATION DOSE; THICKNESS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ALUMINUM; BARIUM; COMPOSITE RESINS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MATERIALS TESTING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SILICON; SOFTWARE; TIME FACTORS; X-RAY FILM; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS; YTTERBIUM; YTTRIUM;

EID: 12344329323     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Akerboom HB, Kreulen CM, Van Amerongen WE & Mol A (1993) Radiopacity of posterior composite resins, composite resin luting cements, and glass ionomer lining cements Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 70(4) 351-355.
2. Borg E & Gröndahl HG (1996) On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 25(2) 82-88.
3. Börg E (1999) Some characteristics of solid state and photostimulable phosphor detectors for intraoral radiography Swedish Dental Journal Supplement 139(8-29) 1-67.
4. Bouschlicher MR, Cobb DS & Boyer DB (1999) Radiopacity of compomers, flowable and conventional resin composites for posterior restorations Operative Dentistry 24(1) 20-25.
5. Brettle DS, Workman A, Ellwood RP, Launders JH, Horner K & Davies RM (1996) The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography British Journal of Radiology 69(819) 256-261.
6. Choi KK, Ferracane J, Hilton TJ & Charlton D (2000) Properties of packable dental composites Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 12(4) 216-226.
7. Cook WD (1981) An investigation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials Australian Dental Journal 26(2) 105-112.
8. Curtis PM Jr, von Fraunhofer JA & Farman AG (1990) The radiographic density of composite restorative resins Oral Surgey, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 70(2) 226-230.
9. Farman TT, Farman AG, Scarfe WC & Goldsmith LJ (1996) Optical densities of dental resin composites: A comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed Plus radiographic film General Dentistry 44(6) 532-537.
10. Hayakawa Y, Farman AG, Kelly MS & Kuroyanagi K (1998) Intraoral radiographic storage phosphor image mean pixel values and signal-to-noise ratio: Effects of calibration Oral Surgey, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontics 86(5) 601-605.
11. Hildebolt CF, Couture RA & Whiting BR (2000) Dental photo-stimulable phosphor radiography Dental Clinics of North America 44(2) 273-297.
12. Huda W, Rill LN, Benn DK & Pettigrew JC (1997) Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology Oral Surgey, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontics 83(6) 725-731.
13. International Standard Organization-4049 (1988) Resin-based filling materials.
14. Langland OE & Langlais R (1997) Diagnostic quality of dental radiographs in Principles of Dental Imaging Williams and Wilkins Baltimore p 49-65.
15. Lutz F & Krejci I (2000) Amalgam substitutes: A critical analysis Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 12(3) 146-159.
16. Marouf N & Sidhu SK (1998) A study on the radiopacity of different shades of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials Operative Dentistry 23(1) 10-14.
17. th edition New York Oxford University Press p 124-133.
18. Miles D (1992) Radiographic image production and film characteristics in Basic Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Philadelphia Saunders WB Company p 49-71.
19. Murchison DF, Charlton DG & Moore WS (1999) Comparative radiopacity of flowable resin composites Quintessence International 30(3) 179-184.
20. NIH Image Engineering 1.62 (1999) (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image) 21 October 2001.
21. Phillips RW & Lutz F (1983) Instruments and equipment status report on posterior composites Council on Dental Materials Journal of the American Dental Association 107(1) 74-76.
22. th edition St Louis Mosby p 479.
23. Sabbagh J, Vreven J & Leloup G (2002) Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity of resin based materials Dental Materials 18(1) 64-71.
24. Shah PM, Sidhu SK, Chong BS & Ford TR (1997) Radiopacity of resin-modified glass ionomer liners and bases Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 77(3) 239-242.
25. Stamatakis HC, Welander U & McDavid WD (1999) Dose response of a storage phosphor system for intraoral radiography Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 28(5) 272-276.
26. Stanford CM, Fan PL, Schoenfeld CM, Knoeppel R & Stanford JW (1987) Radiopacity of light-cured posterior composite resins Journal of the American Dental Association 115(5) 722-724.
27. Toyooka H, Taira M, Wakasa K, Yamaki M, Fujita M & Wada T (1993) Radiopacity of 12 visible-light-cured dental composite resins Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 20(6) 615-622.
28. Van Der Stelt PF (1996) Digital radiology using the DIGORA registration technique [Radiologie numérique à l'aide de la technique d'enregistrement] Digora Revue Belge de Medicine Dentaire 51(2) 93-100.
29. Van Der Stelt PF (2000) Principles of digital imaging Dental Clinics of North America 44(2) 237-248.
30. van Dijken JW, Wing KR & Ruyter IE (1989) An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in Class I and Class II cavities Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 47(6) 401-407.
31. Watts DC (1987) Radiopacity vs composition of some barium and strontium glass composites Journal of Dentistry 15(1) 38-43.
32. Wenzel A, Hintze H & Horsted-Bindslev P (1998) Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images Journal of Forensic Odonto-stomatology 16(1) 8-13.
33. th edition St Louis Mosby pp 68-82.
34. Williams JA & Billington RW (1987) A new technique for measuring the radiopacity of natural tooth substance and restorative materials Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 14(3) 267-269.
35. Yoshiura K, Kawazu T, Chikui T, Tatsumi M, Tokumori K, Tanaka T & Kanda S (1999) Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: Phantom validity Oral Surgey, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology & Endodontics 87(1) 115-122.