Long-term change in territory occupancy pattern of goshawks (Accipiter gentilis)

Ecoscience

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 399-403

  Hakkarainen, Harri ^a   Mykrä, Sakari ^a   Kurki, Sami ^b   Tornberg, Risto ^c   Jungell, Sven ^d   Nikula, Ari ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^d Rovaniemi Research Station ^*  (Finland)

^e FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Accipiter gentilis; Clear cuts; Forest fragmentation; Goshawk; Territory occupancy

Indexed keywords

BREEDING POPULATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; LONG-TERM CHANGE; NEST SITE; POPULATION SIZE; TERRITORY;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; WORLD;

ACCIPITER; ACCIPITER GENTILIS;

EID: 12344325060     PISSN: 11956860     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2004.11682848     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Addicott, J. F., J. M. Aho, M. F. Antolin, D. K. Padilla, J. S. Richardson & D. A. Soluk, 1987. Ecological neighbourhoods: Scaling environmental patterns. Oikos, 49: 340-346.
2. Aebischer, N. J., P. A. Robertson & R. E. Kenward, 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radiotracking data. Ecology, 74: 1313-1325.
3. Aitchison, J., 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Chapman and Hall, London.
4. Andren, H., 1992. Corvid density and nest predation in relation to forest fragmentation: A landscape perspective. Ecology, 73: 794-804.
5. Angelstam, P., 1992. Conservation of communities: The importance of edges, surroundings and landscape mosaic structure. Pages 9-70 in L. Hansson (ed.). Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation: Applications in Temperate and Boreal Environments. Elsevier, Barking.
6. Carey, A. B., S. P. Horton & B. L. Biswell, 1992. Northern spotted owl: Influence of prey base and landscape character. Ecological Monographs, 62: 223-250.
7. Finnish Forest Research Institute, 1984. Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 1984. Valtion painatuskeskus, Helsinki.
8. Finnish Forest Research Institute, 1998. Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 1998. Gummerus Kirjapaino, Jyväskylä.
9. Forsman, D. & B. Ehrnsten, 1985. Is the goshawk declining? Lintumies, 20: 83-88 (in Finnish with English summary).
10. Forsman, E. D., E. C. Meslow & H. M. Wright, 1984. Distribution and biology of the spotted owl in Oregon. Wildlife Monographs, 87: 1-64.
11. Hämet-Ahti, L. & W. Hackman, 1998. Field Flora of Finland. Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki.
12. Hansson, L., 1992. Landscape ecology of boreal forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7: 299-302.
13. Hayward, G. D. & R. E. Escano, 1989. Goshawk nest-site characteristics in western Montana and Northern Idaho. Condor, 91: 476-479.
14. Huhta, E., 1995. Effects of spatial scale and vegetation cover on predation of artificial ground nests. Wildlife Biology, 1: 73-80.
15. Huhta, E., A. Jäntti, P. Suorsa, T. Aho, M. Kuitunen, A. Nikula & H. Hakkarainen, 2003. Habitat related nest predation effect on the breeding success of the Eurasian treecreeper. Écoscience, 10: 283-288.
16. Huhta, E., T. Aho, A. Jäntti, P. Suorsa, M. Kuitunen, A. Nikula & H. Hakkarainen, 2004. Forest fragmentation increases nest predation in the Eurasian treecreeper. Conservation Biology, 18: 148-155.
17. Kenward, R. E., 1982. Goshawk hunting behaviour and range size as a function of food and habitat availability. Journal of Animal Ecology, 51: 69-80.
18. Kurki, S., A. Nikula, P. Helle & H. Linden, 2000. Landscape fragmentation and forest composition effects on grouse breeding success in boreal forests. Ecology, 81: 1985-1997.
19. McCollin, D., 1998. Forest edges and habitat selection in birds: A functional approach. Ecography, 21: 247-260.
20. McGarigal, K. & B. J. Marks, 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. US Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351, Portland, Oregon.
21. Mykrä, S., S. Kurki & A. Nikula, 2000. The spacing of mature forest habitat in relation to species-specific scales in managed boreal forests in NE Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 37: 79-91.
22. Newton, I., 1979. Population Ecology of Raptors. Poyser, Berkhamsted.
23. Ohmann, J. L., P. L. Carleson & A. L. Oakley, 1988. Status of forest-related wildlife and fish resources in Oregon. Pages 17-32 in G.J. Lettman (ed.). Assessment of Oregon's Forests. Oregon State Department of Forestry, Salem, Oregon.
24. Östlund, L., O. Zackrisson & A.-L. Axelsson, 1997. On the use of 'grain-size' in ecology. Functional Ecology, 4: 719-720.
25. Penteriani, V., 2002. Goshawk nesting habitat in Europe and North America: A review. Ornis Fennica, 79: 149-163.
26. Penteriani, V. & B. Faivre, 2001. Effects of harvesting timber stands on goshawk nesting in two European areas. Biological Conservation, 101: 211-216.
27. Rolstad, J. & P. Wegge, 1989. Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus populations and modern forestry - A case for landscape ecological studies. Finnish Game Research, 46: 43-52.
28. Salminen, S & O. Salminen, 1999. Forest resources in Middle Finland, 1988-92, and in South Finland, 1986-92. Reports from the Finnish Forest Research Institute 710/1998, Helsinki.
29. Sibley, C. G. & B. L. Monroe Jr., 1996. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
30. Small, M. F. & M. L. Hunter, 1988. Forest fragmentation and avian nest predation in forest landscapes. Oecologia, 76: 62-64.
31. Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry, 2nd Edition. Freeman, New York, New York.
32. Suorsa, P., H. Helle, E. Huhta, A. Jäntti, A. Nikula & H. Hakkarainen, 2003a. Forest fragmentation is associated with primary brood sex ratio in the treecreeper (Certhia familiatis). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 270: 2215-2222.
33. Suorsa, P., E. Huhta, A. Nikula, M. Nikinmaa, A. Jäntti, H. Helle & H. Hakkarainen, 2003b. Forest management is associated with physiological stress in an old-growth forest passerine. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 270: 963-969.
34. Temeles, E. J., 1985. Sexual size dimorphism of bird-eating hawks: The effect of prey vulnerability. American Naturalist, 125: 485-499.
35. Tomppo, E., H. Henttonen, K. Korhonen, A. Aarnio, A. Ihalainen, J. Heikkinen & T. Tuomainen, 1999. Forest resources and their development in central Finland in 1967-1996. Folia Forestalia, 2B/1999 (in Finnish).
36. Tornberg, R. & S. Sulkava, 1991. The effect of changing tetraonid populations on the nutrition and breeding success of the goshawk ( Accipiter gentilis L.) in Northern Finland. Aquilo Series Zoologici, 28: 23-33.
37. Vuorela, A., 1997. Satellite based land cover and forest classification of Finland. Finnish-Russian Seminar on Remote Sensing 29 August - 1 September 1994. Reports of the Geodetic Institute, 97: 41-51.
38. Widén, P., 1989. The hunting habitats of goshawks Accipiter gentilis in boreal forests of central Sweden. Ibis, 131: 205-231.
39. Widén, P., 1997. How and why is the goshawk (Accipiter gentilis ) affected by modern forest management in Fennoscandia? Journal of Raptor Research, 31: 107-113.