New results in control synthesis for electrohydraulic servos

International Journal of Fluid Power

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 25-38

  Ursu, Ioan ^a   Ursu, Felicia ^a  

^a University Politehinica Bucharest   (Romania)

Author keywords

Antiwindup compensation; Backstepping control; Control saturation; Electrohydraulic servo; Fuzzy supervised neurocontrol; Numerical simulation; Robust linear control

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; LYAPUNOV METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

ANTIWINDUP COMPENSATION; BACKSTEPPING CONTROL; CONTROL SATURATION; ELECTROHYDRAULIC SERVO; FUZZY SUPERVISED NEUROCONTROL; ROBUST LINEAR CONTROL;

SERVOMOTORS;

EID: 12344266978     PISSN: 14399776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14399776.2004.10781199     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Åström, K. J., and Wittenmark, B., 1974. Computer controlled systems. Theory and design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Blackburn, J. E., Shearer, J. L., and Reethof, G., 1960. Fluid power control. Tech. Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Wiley, New York.
3. Bobrow, J. E., and Lum, K., 1996. Adaptive, high band-width control of a hydraulic actuator, Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurements and Control, 118, December, pp. 714–720.
4. Davison, E. J., and Goldenberg, A., 1975. Robust control of a general servomechanism problem:the servocompensator. Automatica, 11, pp. 461–471.
5. Davison, E. J., 1976. The robust control of a servo-mechanism problem for linear time-invariant multivariable system. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 21, pp. 25–34.
6. Ermakov, S. A., Klaptsova, T. S., and Smirnov, G. G., 1986. Synthesis of electrohydraulic tracking systems with observers (in Russian), Pnevmatika i Gidravlika. 12, Moskow, Mashinostroenie, pp. 45–54.
7. Frankena, J. F., and Sivan, R., 1979. A nonlinear optimal control law for linear systems. International Journal of Control, 30, pp. 159–178.
8. Ghazi Zadeh, A., Fahim, A. M., and El-Gindy, M., 1997. Neural network and fuzzy logic applications to vehicle systems:literature survey. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 18, pp. 132–193.
9. rd IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Glasgow, pp. 995–1000.
10. Halanay, A., Safta, C. A., Ursu, I., and Ursu, F., 2004. Stability of equilibria in a four—dimensional nonlinear model of a hydraulic servomechanism. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 49, pp. 391–406.
11. Han, J., 1989. Control theory:it is a theory of model or control? Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 9, pp. 328–335.
12. Hanus, R., Kinnaert, M., and Henrotte, J.-L., 1987. Conditioning technique:a general antiwindup and bumpless transfer method. Automatica, 23, pp. 729–739.
13. nd European Control Conference, Groningen, the Netherlands, July, pp. 215–219.
14. rd European Control Conference, 3, Rome, Italy, pp. 1545–1549.
15. Jelali, M., and Kroll, A., 2003. Hydraulic servo-systems. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
16. th Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP′97, Linköping, Sweden, May 28–30.
17. Krikelis, N. J., and Barkas, S. K., 1984, Design of tracking systems subject to actuator saturation. International Journal of Control, 39, 4, pp. 667–682.
18. Krstić, M., Kanellakopoulos, I., and Kokotović, P., 1995. Nonlinear and adaptive control design, Wiley and Sons, New York.
19. Mihajlov, M., Nikolić, V., and Antić, D., 2002. Position control of an electro-hydraulic servo system using sliding mode control enhanced by fuzzy PI controller. Facta Universitas. Series:Mechanical Engineering, 1, pp. 1217–1230.
20. Panasian, H. V., 1986. Reduced order observers applied to state and parameter estimation of hydro- mechanical servoactuators. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 9, pp. 249–251.
21. Park, J. K., and Choi, C.-H., 1993. A compensation method for improving the performance of multi variable control systems with saturating actuators. Control-Theory and Advanced Technology, 9, pp. 305–322.
22. Plummer, A. R., 1997. Feedback linearization for acceleration control of electrohydraulic actuators. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 211, Part 1, pp. 395–406.
23. rd European Control Conference, Rome, Italy, September, pp. 330–334.
24. Sepulchre, R., Janković, M., and Kokotovic, P., 1997. Constructive nonlinear control, Springer-Verlag, London.
25. rd Conference on Decision and Control, Lake Buena Vista, FL, pp. 150–155.
26. Tzes, A., and Peng, P.-Y., 1997. Fuzzy neural network control for DC-motor micromaneuvering. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 119, pp. 312–315.
27. Ursu, I., 1984. Theoretical and experimental data concerning qualification testing and flight clearance for aircraft servomechanism SMHR. National Institute for Scientific and Technical Creation—INCREST Report, N-5303, Bucharest.
28. Ursu, I., Popescu, F., Vladimirescu, M., and Costin, R., 1994. On some linearization methods of the generalized flow rate characteristic of the hydraulic servomechanism. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Technique, Série de Mécanique Appliquée, 39, pp. 207–217.
29. Ursu, I., Vladimirescu, M., and Ursu, F., 1996. About aeroservoelasticity criteria for electrohydraulic servo-mechanisms synthesis. Proceedings of ICAS' 96, Sorrento, Italy, pp. 2335–2344.
30. Ursu, I., Tecuceanu, G., Ursu, F., Sireteanu, T., and Vladimirescu, M., 1998. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 70, 4, pp. 259–264.
31. Ursu, I., Ursu F., Sireteanu, T., and Stammers, C. W., 2000. Artificial intelligence based synthesis of semiactive suspension systems. Shock and Vibration Digest, 32, pp. 3–10.
32. Ursu, I., Ursu, F., and Iorga, L., 2001. Neuro-fuzzy synthesis of flight controls electrohydraulic servo. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 73, pp. 465–471.
33. th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace, Bologna-Forli, September, 2–7, pp. 197–202.
34. Ursu, I., and Ursu, F., 2002. Active and semiactive control. Romanian Academy Publishing House, Bucharest.
35. Ursu, I., and Popescu, F., 2003. Nonlinear control synthesis for position and force electrohydraulic servos. Proceedings of the Romanian Academy, Series A, 4, 2, pp. 115–120.
36. Vemuri, V., 1993. Artificial neural networks in control applications. In Advances in Computers, edited by M. C., Yovits, Academic Press, 36, pp. 203–332.
37. Vossoughi, G., and Donath, M., 1995. Dynamic feedback linearization for electrohydraulically actuated control systems. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurements and Control, 117, December, pp. 468–477.
38. Zhou, K., Doyle, J. K., and Glover, K., 1996. Robust and optimal control, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
39. Yen, J., Langari, R., and Zadeh, L. A., Eds. 1995. Industrial applications of fuzzy control and intelligent systems. New York, IEEE Press.
40. Wang, L., 1994. Adaptive fuzzy systems and control—design and stability analysis, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
41. Wang, P. K. C., 1963. Analytical design of electrohydraulic servomechanism with near time-optimal response. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control AC-8, pp. 15–27.
42. rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Buena Vista, Florida, December 14–16, 4, pp. 4122–4127.