Reaction to "comments on the effects of leader-member exchange and differential treatment on work unit commitment': Distinguishing between neutralizing and moderating effects"

Psychological Reports

Volumn 95, Issue 3 I, 2004, Pages 879-882

  Van Breukelen, Wim ^a,b   Konst, Dorien ^a   Van Der Vlist, René ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344257221     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.95.3.879-882     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. AIKEN, L. S., & WEST, S. G. (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
2. ARNOLD, H. J. (1982) Moderator variables: a clarification of conceptual, analytic and psychometric issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 143-174.
3. ARNOLD, H. J. (1984) Testing moderator variable hypotheses: a reply to Stone and Hollenbeck. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 214-224.
4. COHEN, J., & COHEN, P. (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. HOWELL, J. P., DORFMAN, P. W., & KERR, S. (1986) Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 88-102.
6. JACCARD, J., TURRISI, R., & WAN, C. K. (1990) Interaction effects in multiple regression. London: Sage.
7. VAN BREUKELEN, W., KONST, D., & VAN DER VLIST, R. (2002) Effects of LMX and differential treatment on work unit commitment. Psychological Reports, 91, 220-230.
8. VILLA, J. R., HOWELL, J. P., DORFMAN, P. W., & DANIEL, D. L. (2003) Problems with detecting moderators in leadership research using moderated multiple regression. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 3-23.
9. YE, X., & BARBUTO, J. E. (2004) Comments on "The effects of leader-member exchange and differential treatment on work unit commitment": distinguishing between neutralizing and moderating effects. Psychological Reports, 94, 495-500.