Combined use of life cycle assessment and groundwater transport modeling to support contaminated site management

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1099-1116

  Godin, Julie ^a,b   Ménard, Jean François ^b   Hains, Sylvain ^c   Deschênes, Louise ^a,b   Samson, Réjean ^a,b  

^a Université Laval   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c GOLDER ASSOCIATES LTD   (Canada)

Author keywords

LCA; Modeling of contaminant transport in groundwater; Site remediation; Site specific assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 12244254024     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030490887159     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson MP and Woessner WW. 1992. Applied Groundwater Modeling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA
2. Carsel RF and Parrish RS. 1988. Developing joint probability distributions of soil water retention characteristics. Water Resour Res 24(5):755-69
3. Delft University of Technology. 2001. IDEMAT 2001 Database. Available at http://www.io.tudelft.nl/research/dfs/idemat/index.htm
4. Diamond ML, Page CA, Campbell M, et al. 1999. Life cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: Method and generic survey. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:788-800
5. Ferguson C and Kasamas H. 1999. Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe; Volume 2, Policy Frameworks. LQM Press, London, UK
6. Franklin Associates. 1998. Franklin US LCI database. Available at http://www.pre.nl/download/manuals/DatabaseManualFranklinUS98.pdf
7. Fitch JR and Cheeseman CR. 2003. Characterization of environmentally exposed cement-based stabilized/solidified industrial waste. J Haz Mat: 239-55
8. Hauschild M and Pennington D. 2002. Indicators for ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. In: Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, et al. Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving Towards Best Practice, pp 149-76. Published by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), Pensacola, FL, USA
9. Hertwich E, Jolliet O, Pennington D, et al. 2002. Fate and exposure assessment in the life cycle impact assessment of toxic chemicals. In: Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, et al. Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving Towards Best Practice, pp 149-76. Published by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), Pensacola, FL, USA
10. ISO (International Standard Organization). 1997. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework. CAN/CSA- ISO 14040-97
11. ISO (International Standard Organization). 2000. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Examples of application to goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. CAN/CSA-ISO 14049-00
12. Jolliet O. 1996. Impact assessment of human and eco-toxicity in life cycle assessment. In: Udo de Haes HA (ed), Towards a Methodology for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, pp. 49-62. SETAC-Europe, Brussels, Belgium
13. Koning A, Guinée J, Pennington D, et al. 2002. Methods and typology report part A: Inventory and classification of LCA characterization methods for assessing toxic releases. Contribution to Work-package 7 of the Omnitox project as part A. Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
14. Olsen SI. 2000. Life cycle assessment versus risk assessment - an introduction. In risk assessment and life cycle assessment-environmental strategies, Nordic Workshop, Vedbæk 1999. TEMANORD 2000:545. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark
15. Page CA, Diamond ML, Campbell M, et al. 1999. Life cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: case study. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:801-10
16. PRè Consultants. 2002. SimaPro 5.1 LCA Software. Available at http://www.pre.nl/
17. Therrien R and Sudicky EA. 1996. Three-dimensional analysis of variably-saturated flow and solute transport in discretely-fractured porous media. J Contam Hydrol 23 (1-2):1:44
18. Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O and Finnveden G. 1999. Best Available Practice Regarding Categories and Category Indicators in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Background document for the Second Working group on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC-Europe (WIA-2). Int J LCA 4(2):66-74
19. UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). 2001. Joint EMEP/CORINAIR Atmospheric Emission Inventory Guidebook, 3rd Edition. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark
20. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1994. The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model: Engineering documentation for version 3. EPA/600/9-94/168b. Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, USA
21. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1996. Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document. EPA/540/R-95/128. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, DC, USA
22. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. Hazardous Waste Management System: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste, Removal of Final Rule. 62 FR 37696. Office of Solid Wastes, Washington, DC, USA
23. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Exhaust Emission Factors for Non-road Engine Modeling-Compression-Ignition. EPA/NR/009A. Assessment and Standards Division, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
24. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. An International Workshop on Life Cycle Impact Assessment Sophistication. EPA/600/R-00/023. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, USA
25. Volkwein S, Hurtig HW, and Klopffer W. 1999. Life cycle assessment of contaminated sites Remediation. Int J LCA 4 (5):263-74
26. Wenzel H, Hauschild M, and Alting L. 1997. Environmental Assessment of Products - Volume 1: Methodology, Tools and Case Studies in Product Development. Chapman & Hall, London, UK
27. Wrisberg N, Udo de Haes HA, Triebswetter U, et al. 2002. Analytical Tools for Environmental Design and Management in a Systems Perspective, the Combined Use of Analytical Tools. Dordrecht, The Netherlands