Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: Method and generic survey

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 788-800

  Diamond, Miriam L ^c   Page, Cynthia A ^c   Campbell, Monica ^a   McKenna, Stephen ^a   Lall, Ronald ^b  

^a TORONTO PUBLIC HEALTH   (Canada)

^b R Addison Lall and Associates   (Canada)

^c R Addison Lall and Associates ^*

Author keywords

Contaminated groundwater; Contaminated soil; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle management; Site remediation

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATED LAND; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; REMEDIATION; SITE INVESTIGATION;

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ENCAPSULATION; LIFE CYCLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL TREATMENT; WASTE DISPOSAL; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 0032994691     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620180427     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Canadian Standards Association. 1994. Environmental life cycle assessment. CAN/CSA-Z 760. Toronto, ON.
2. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 1991. A technical framework for life-cycle assessment. Workshop Report. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA.
3. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 1993. A conceptual framework for life-cycle impact assessment. Workshop Report. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA.
4. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 1993. Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A Code of Practice. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA.
5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Product life-cycle assessment: Inventory guidelines and principles. EPA/600/R-92/ 036. Cincinnati, OH.
6. Young SB. 1996. Life cycle management approaches in Canadian industry. Proceedings, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development/European Community Workshop on Life Cycle Approaches, European Commission DG XII, Brussels, Belgium, October 21-22.
7. Environment Canada. 1995. Ecocycle: Newsletter on Life Cycle Tools, Management and Product Policy, Issue 1. Ottawa, ON.
8. Page CA, Diamond ML, Campbell M, McKenna S. 1999. Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: Case study. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:801-810.
9. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 1994. Life-Cycle Assessment Data Quality: A Conceptual Framework. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA.
10. Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy. 1996. Guideline for use at contaminated sites in Ontario. Toronto, ON, Canada.
11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol 1 - Human Health Evaluation Manual. EPA/540/1-89/002. Washington, DC.
12. Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Udo de Haes HA, Huppes G. 1993. Quantitative life-cycle assessment of products. 2. Classification, valuation and improvement analysis. J Clean Prod 1:81-91.
13. Campbell M, MacRitchie S, Diamond M, McKenna S. 1995. A framework for assessing environmental and health concerns associated with site remediation technologies. Environ Health Rev 39:32-37.
14. North York Public Health Department. 1997. Food safety program descriptions and a systematic review of the effectiveness of documented interventions. Ontario Ministry of Health, North York, ON, Canada.
15. Cowell SJ, Clift R. 1995. Life-cycle assessment for food production systems. Proceedings, Fertilizer Society International Conference, Cambridge, UK, December 6-8, pp 1-36.
16. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 1997. Life-cycle impact assessment: The state-of-the-art. SETAC Life-Cycle Assessment Report. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA.
17. Guinée JB, Heijungs R. 1993. A proposal for the classification of toxic substances within the framework of life cycle assessment of products. Chemosphere 26:1925-1944.
18. Jia CQ, Di Guardo A, Mackay D. 1996. Toxics release inventories: Opportunities for improved presentation and interpretation. Environ Sci Technol 30:86a-91a.
19. Mackay D, Paterson S, Shiu WY. 1992. Generic models for evaluating the regional fate of chemicals. Chemosphere 24:695-717.
20. Mackay D, Diamond ML. 1989. Application of the QWASI (quantitative water air sediment interaction) fugacity model to the dynamics of organic and inorganic chemicals in lakes. Chemosphere 18:1343-1365.
21. Diamond ML, Mackay D, Welborn PM. 1993. Models of multimedia partitioning of multi-species chemicals: Fugacity/aquivalence approach. Chemosphere 25:1907-1921.
22. Diamond ML, MacRitchie S. 1991. Identification of potential environmental and health concerns of soil remediation technologies. Technical Report. City of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
23. Paustenbach DJ. 1989. Methodology for evaluating the environmental and public health risks of contaminated soil. In Kostecki PT, Calabrese EJ, eds, Petroleum Contaminated Soils, Vol 1 - Remediation Techniques, Environmental Fate, Risk Assessment. Lewis, Chelsea, MI, USA, pp 225-261.
24. Asante-Duah DK. 1996. Management of Contaminated Site Problems. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
25. Russel DL. 1992. Remediation Manual for Petroleum Contaminated Sites. Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, UK.
26. Caldwell JA, Reith C. 1993. Principles and Practice of Waste Encapsulation. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
27. Cole GM. 1994. Assessment and Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Sites. Lewis, Boca Ration, FL, USA.
28. Bellandi R, ed. 1988. Hazardous Waste Site Remediation, The Engineer's Perspective. Van Nostrand Reinhold, NY, USA.
29. Laidlaw Environmental Services. 1994. Landfill service continuation environmental assessment - Draft design and operations report. Corunna, ON, Canada.
30. Truex MJ, et al. 1994. Deploying in-situ bioremediation at the Hanford site. In Gee GW, Wing NR, eds, In-Situ Bioremediation: Scientific Basis for Current and Future Technologies, Part 1. Battelle, Columbus, OH, USA, pp 209-231.
31. Norris RD, Matthews JE. 1994. Handbook of Bioremediation. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
32. McEldowney S, Hardman DJ, Waite S. 1993. Pollution: Ecology and Biotreatment. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, Essex, UK.
33. Anderson WC, ed. 1993. Innovative Site Remediation Technology: Soil Washing/Soil Flushing, Vol 3. American Academy of Environmental Engineers, Annapolis, MD.
34. National Groundwater and Soil Remediation Program. 1991. Final report on current and innovative excavate and treatment technologies for the remediation of contaminated soils. Burlington, ON, Canada.
35. Fam S. 1996. Vapor extraction and bioventing. In Nyer EK, et al, eds, In-Situ Treatment Technology. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 101-147.
36. Chambers CD. 1991. In Situ Treatment of Hazardous Waste-Contaminated Soils, 2nd ed. Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, NJ, USA.
37. Todd JA. 1996. Streamlining. In Curan MA, ed. Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, pp 4.1-4.17.