Néel-dimer transition in an antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model and deconfinement of spinons at the critical point

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 17, 2004, Pages 1-4

  Yoshioka, Daisuke ^a   Arakawa, Gaku ^a   Ichinose, Ikuo ^a   Matsui, Tetsuo ^b  

^a NAGOYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b KINKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENERGY TRANSFER; PHASE TRANSITION; QUANTUM MECHANICS; QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 12244250788     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.174407     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. See for example, S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).
2. A. D'Adda, P. Di Vecchia, and M. Lüscher, Nucl. Phys. B 146, 63 (1978); E. Witten, ibid. 149, 285 (1979).
3. A. D'Adda, P. Di Vecchia, and M. Lüscher, Nucl. Phys. B 146, 63 (1978); E. Witten, ibid. 149, 285 (1979).
4. I. Ya. Aref'eva and S.I. Azakov, Nucl. Phys. B 162, 298 (1980).
5. For the s=1/2 AF Heisenberg models, standard derivations were given by I. Ichinose and T. Matsui, Phys. Rev. B 45, 9976 (1992); ibid. 57, 13 790 (1998); see also D.P. Arovas and A. Auerbach, ibid. 38, 316 (1988).
6. For the s=1/2 AF Heisenberg models, standard derivations were given by I. Ichinose and T. Matsui, Phys. Rev. B 45, 9976 (1992); ibid. 57, 13 790 (1998); see also D.P. Arovas and A. Auerbach, ibid. 38, 316 (1988).
7. For the s=1/2 AF Heisenberg models, standard derivations were given by I. Ichinose and T. Matsui, Phys. Rev. B 45, 9976 (1992); ibid. 57, 13 790 (1998); see also D.P. Arovas and A. Auerbach, ibid. 38, 316 (1988).
8. F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1029 (1988).
9. N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1694 (1989); Phys. Rev. B 42, 4568 (1990).
10. N. Read and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1694 (1989); Phys. Rev. B 42, 4568 (1990).
11. See for example, M. Kamal and G. Murthy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1911 (1993), and references cited therein.
12. P. Tomczak and J. Richter, J. Phys. A 34, L461 (2001), and references cited therein; see also, R.R.P. Singh, M.P. Gelfand, and D.A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2484 (1988).
13. P. Tomczak and J. Richter, J. Phys. A 34, L461 (2001), and references cited therein; see also, R.R.P. Singh, M.P. Gelfand, and D.A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2484 (1988).
14. A.M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B 120, 429 (1977).
15. I. Ichinose and T. Matsui, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 942 (2001).
16. I. Ichinose, T. Matsui, and M. Onoda, Phys. Rev. B 64, 104516 (2001).
17. H. Kleinert, F.S. Nogueira, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 232001 (2002); Nucl. Phys. B 666, 361 (2003).
18. H. Kleinert, F.S. Nogueira, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 232001 (2002); Nucl. Phys. B 666, 361 (2003).
19. I.F. Herbut and B.H. Seradjeh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 171601 (2003).
20. I.F. Herbut, B.H. Seradjeh, S. Sachdev, and G. Murthy, Phys. Rev. B 68, 195110 (2003).
21. x〉 ≠ 0. In this case, the summation over Γ is convergent even for Uμ=1.
22. †(n).
23. We calculate the correlation of the Polyakov lines instead of the Wilson loop because the system is anisotropic. The spatial correlation of the Polyakov lines can be an order parameter of the deconfinement transition in the gauge system (11).
24. A.M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 72, 477 (1978); L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 20, 2610 (1979).
25. A.M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 72, 477 (1978); L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 20, 2610 (1979).
26. T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, V. Vishwanath, and M.P.A. Fisher, cond-mat/0312617.
27. G. Arakawa, I. Ichinose, T. Matsui, and K. Sakakibara (unpublished).