Selection and consolidation of objects and actions

Psychological Research

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 157-166

  Hommel, Bernhard ^a,b   Doeller, Christian F ^b,c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; NERVE CONDUCTION; NETHERLANDS; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; NETHERLANDS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; REFRACTORY PERIOD, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 12144274769     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-004-0171-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Akyürek, E. G., & Hommel, B. (2004). Short-term memory and the Attentional Blink: Capacity versus content. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. Baddeley, A., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575-589.
3. Egeth, H. (1977). Attention and preattention. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 277-320). New York: Academic Press.
4. Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368-1384.
5. Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260-273.
6. Hommel, B., & Schneider, W.X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392-420.
7. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
8. Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual-short term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 683-702.
9. Johnston, J. C., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (1995). Chronometric dissociation of input attention and central attention in human information processing. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
10. Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 596-616.
11. Jolicoeur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202.
12. Jolicoeur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (1999). Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding. Psychological Research, 62, 154-164.
13. Jolicoeur, P., Dell'Acqua, R., & Crebolder, J. (2000). Multitasking performance deficits: Forging some links between the attentional blink and the psychological refractory period. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention & performance XVIII (pp. 309-330). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Jolicoeur, P., Tombu, M., Oriet, C., & Stevanovski, B. (2002). From perception to action: Making the connection. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention & performance XIX (pp. 558-586). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effect of number of alternative on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167-178.
16. Logan, G. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 32-63.
17. Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of the concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 189-207.
18. Logan, G. D. (1980). Short-term memory demands of reaction-time tasks that differ in complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 375-389.
19. Luck, S. J., & Beach, N. J. (1998). Visual attention and the binding problem: A neurophysiological perspective. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 455-478). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
21. Olson, I. R., Chun, M. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2001). Effects of phonological length on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1116-1123.
22. Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1023-1040.
23. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
24. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41 A, 19-45.
26. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
27. Shapiro, K. L., Arnell, K. M., & Raymond, J. E. (1997). The attentional blink: A view on attention and glimpse on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 291-296.
28. Smith, M. C. (1969). The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 30, 220-231.
29. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
30. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention & performance XIX (pp. 538-552). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1-36.
32. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1997). Decision and response. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 266-307.
33. Ward, R., Duncan, J., & Shapiro, K. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 79-109.
34. Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance - a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
35. Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219-224.