Inhibition, integrity and etiquette among online learners: The art of niceness

Distance Education

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 197-212

  Conrad, Dianne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11944275217     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0158791022000009204     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andersen, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W., 2001. Assessing teacher presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2) Retrieved February 8, 2002, from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol5issue2v2.htm
2. Angeli, C., Bonk, C., and Kara, N., 1998. Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course Retrieved March 14, 2002, from http://crlt.indiana.edu/pub- Iications/crlt98-2.pdf
3. Brown, R. E., 2001. The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2): 18–35.
4. Bullen, M., 1998. Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2): 1–32.
5. Clandinin, D. J., and Connelly, F. M., 2000. Narrative inquiry, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Conrad, D., 2002. Community social presence and engagement in online learning, Edmonton, Alberta: University of Alberta. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
7. Conrad, D., Engagement, excitement, anxiety and fear: Learners' experiences of starting an online course. American Journal of Distance Education, 164 in press
8. Crites, S., 1971. The narrative quality of experience. American Academy of Religion Journal, 39(3): 291–311.
9. Curtis, D. D., and Lawson, M. L., 2001. Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1) Retrieved from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/Vol5_issue1/Curtis/curtis.htm
10. De Kerckhove, D., 1997. Connected intelligence: The arrival of the web society, Toronto: Somerville House Publishing.
11. Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M., and Anzul, M., 1997. On writing qualitative research: Living by words, London: The Falmer Press.
12. Gackenbach, J., ed. 1998. Psychology and the Internet, San Diego: Academic Press.
13. Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W., 2000. A transactional perspective on teaching and learning: A framework for adult and higher education, Amsterdam: Pergamon.
14. Glesne, C., and Peshkin, A., 1992. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction, White Plains, NY: Longman.
15. Guba, E., and Lincoln, Y., 1994. “ Competing paradigms in qualitative research ”. In Handbook of qualitative research, Edited by: Denzinn, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S., 105–117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Gunawardena, C. N., 1995. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(2/3): 147–166.
17. Jacobson, D., 2001. On theorizing presence Retrieved March 23, 2002, from http://www.brandeis.edu/pubs/jove/HTML/V6/presence.html
18. Jonassen, D. H., 1992. “ Evaluating constructivist learning ”. In Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation, Edited by: Duffy, T. M., and Jonassen, D. H., 45–56. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Kanuka, H., and Anderson, T., 1998. Online social interchange, discord and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1): 57–74.
20. McLean, S., and Morrison, D., 2000. Sociodemographic characteristics of learners. Journal of Distance Education, 15(2): 17–36.
21. Palloff, R. M., and Pratt, K., 1999. Building learning communities in Cyberspace, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Renner, P., 1993. The art of teaching adults: How to become an exceptional instructor and facilitator, Vancouver: PFR Training.
23. Rheingold, H., 1993. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier, New York: Harper Perennial.
24. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W., 1999. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2): 50–71.
25. Schwier, R. A., 2001. Catalysts, emphases and elements of virtual learning communities: Implications for research and practice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(1): 5–18.
26. Shea, V., 1994. Netiquette Retrieved February 27, 2002, from http://www.albion.com/neti- quette/book/index.html
27. Stacey, E., 1999. Collaborative learning in an online environment. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2): 14–33.
28. Steier, F., 1991. “ Research as self-reflexivity, self-reflexivity as social process ”. In Research and reflexivity, Edited by: Steier, F., 1–11. London: Sage.
29. Suler, J., 1996. The psychology of Cyberspace Retrieved March 30, 2002, from http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/integrate.html
30. Turkle, S., 1995. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet, New York: Simon & Schuster.
31. Vrasidas, C., and McIssac, M. S., 2000. “ Factors influencing interaction in on online course ”. In Web-based communications, the Internet, and distance education, Edited by: Moore, M. G., and Cozine, G. T., 62–72. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
32. Wallace, P., 1999. The psychology of the Internet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Wiesenberg, F., 2001. The roller coaster life on the online learner: How distance educators can help students cope. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 27(2): 33–59.
35. Yeoman, E., 1995. "Sam's Caf": A case study of computer conferencing as a medium for collective journal writing. Canadian Journal of Education Communication, 24(3): 209–226.