Wanna trade? Product knowledge and the perceived differences between the gains and losses of trade

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 23-34

  Van Dijk, Eric ^a   Van Knippenberg, Daan ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11944266656     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.230     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Bar-Hillel, M., & Neter, E. (1996). Why are people reluctant to exchange lottery tickets? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 17-27.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 229-237.
4. Beggan, J. K., & Brown, E. M. (1994). Association as a psychological justification for ownership. Journal of Psychology, 128, 365-380.
5. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139-168.
6. Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: How value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
7. Chapman, G. B. (1998). Similarity and reluctance to trade. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 11, 47-58.
8. Ciarrochi, J., & Forgas, J. P. (2000). The pleasure of possessions: Affective influences and personality in the evaluation of consumer items. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 631-649.
9. De Dreu, C. K. W., Carnevale, P. J., Emans, B. J. M., & Van de Vliert, E. (1994). Effects of frames in negotiation: Loss aversion, mismatching, and frame adoption. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 60, 193-207.
10. De Dreu, C. K. W., Carnevale, P. J., Emans, B. J. M., & Van de Vliert, E. (1995). Outcome-frames in bilateral negotiation: Resistance to concession making and frame adoption. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 97-125). Chichester: Wiley.
11. Duijker, H. (1997). Ontdek de wereld van de wijn [Discover the world of wine]. Wormer: Inmerc.
12. Johnson, K. E., & Mervis, C. B. (1997). Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 248-277.
13. Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 51, 296-312.
14. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
15. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase-theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325-1348.
16. Knetsch, J. L. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. The American Economic Review, 79, 1325-1348.
17. Knetsch, J. L., Tang, F. F., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). The endowment effect and repeated market trials: Is the Vickrey auction demand revealing? Experimental Economics, 4, 257-269.
18. Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1135-1145.
19. Loewenstein, G., & Adler, D. (1995). A bias in the prediction of tastes. The Economic Journal, 105, 929-937.
20. Mackenzie, C. (1997). Where are the motives? A problem with evidence in the work of Richard Thaler. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 123-135.
21. Mandel, D. R. (2002). Beyond mere ownership: Transaction demand as a moderator of the endowment effect. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 88, 737-747.
22. Morrison, G. C. (1997a). Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept: Comment. The American Economic Review, 87, 236-240.
23. Morrison, G. C. (1997b). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: Some evidence of an endowment effect. Applied Economics, 29, 411-417.
24. Morrison, G. C. (1998). Understanding the disparity between WTP and WTA: Endowment effect, substitutability, or imprecise preferences? Economics Letters, 59, 189-194.
25. Nesselroade, K. P. Jr., Beggan, J. K., & Allison, S. T. (1999). Possession enhancement in an interpersonal context: An extension of the mere ownership effect. Psychology and Marketing, 16, 21-34.
26. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boes-Brahm, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
27. Thaler, R., (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 1, 39-60.
28. Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-214.
29. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 12, 183-206.
30. Van Boven, L., Dunning, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperceptions of the endowment effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 66-76.
31. Van Dijk, E., & van Knippenberg, D. (1996). Buying and selling exchange goods: Loss aversion and the endowment effect. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 517-524.
32. Van Dijk, E., & van Knippenberg, D. (1998). Trading wine: On the endowment effect, loss aversion, and the comparability of consumer goods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 485-495.