Unmanaged care: The need to regulate new reproductive technologies in the United States

Bioethics

Volumn 11, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 347-364

  Cohen, Cynthia B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CHILD; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DONOR; ECONOMICS; EUROPE; FEE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FREEDOM; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GERM CELL; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDUSTRY; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INFORMED CONSENT; INJURY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL APPROACH; MALPRACTICE; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL GENETICS; NATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD ON ETHICS IN REPRODUCTION (NABER); NATIONAL BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION; OOCYTE DONATION; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; POLICY; POLITICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; REPRODUCTION; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CONTROL; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL WELFARE; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; LEGAL APPROACH; NATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD ON ETHICS IN REPRODUCTION (NABER); NATIONAL BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; CHILD; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DISCLOSURE; ECONOMICS; EUGENICS; EUROPE; FEES AND CHARGES; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FREEDOM; GERM CELLS; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; GREAT BRITAIN; GUIDELINES; HEALTH FACILITIES; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERNATIONALITY; MALPRACTICE; OOCYTE DONATION; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIANS; POLICY MAKING; POLITICS; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PUBLIC POLICY; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIAL WELFARE; SOCIETIES; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 0346573007     PISSN: 02699702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8519.00075     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. National Public Radio, All Things Considered, July 20, 1995. Transcript, p. 23.
2. D.M. Gianelli, 'Fraud Scandal Closes California Fertility Clinic'. American Medical News, June 19, 1995, p. 1; National Public Radio, Transcript, p. 25; J. Smolowe, T. Weingarten, 'The Test-Tube Custody Fight', Time, March 18, 1996, p. 80.
3. D.M. Gianelli, 'Fraud Scandal Closes California Fertility Clinic'. American Medical News, June 19, 1995, p. 1; National Public Radio, Transcript, p. 25; J. Smolowe, T. Weingarten, 'The Test-Tube Custody Fight', Time, March 18, 1996, p. 80.
4. D.M. Gianelli, 'Fraud Scandal Closes California Fertility Clinic'. American Medical News, June 19, 1995, p. 1; National Public Radio, Transcript, p. 25; J. Smolowe, T. Weingarten, 'The Test-Tube Custody Fight', Time, March 18, 1996, p. 80.
5. See Reference 3 at p. 18.
6. Gianelli, American Medical News, op. cit., p. 1.
7. Office of the President, University of California, Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Systemwide Task Force Report and Recommendations to Strengthen Oversight and Improve Quality of Care, March, 1996.
8. J.A. Robertson, Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994.
9. C.B. Cohen, "'Give Me Children or I Shall Die!" New Reproductive Technologies and Harm to Children', Hastings Center Report 26 (2); 19-27, 1996).
10. Ethics Committee, American Fertility Society, 'Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies', Fertility and Sterility, 53 (6), Suppl. 2 June, 1990.
11. L. Wilcox, 'Federal Oversight of Assisted Reproduction: Public Health, Consumer Protection, and Public Resources'. Women's Health Issues, 6 (1); 150-155; 1996; M.A. Katz, 'Federal Trade Commission Staff Concerns with Assisted Reproductive Technology Advertising', Fertility and Sterility 64 (1); 10-12, 1995.
12. L. Wilcox, 'Federal Oversight of Assisted Reproduction: Public Health, Consumer Protection, and Public Resources'. Women's Health Issues, 6 (1); 150- 155; 1996; M.A. Katz, 'Federal Trade Commission Staff Concerns with Assisted Reproductive Technology Advertising', Fertility and Sterility 64 (1); 10-12, 1995.
13. National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction, 'Report and Recommendations on Oocyte Donation by the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction (NABER)'. In C.B. Cohen, ed., New Ways of Making Babies: The Case of Egg Donation pp. 231-302, Indiana and Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.
14. National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction, 'Report on Human Cloning through Embryo Splitting: An Amber Light', Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4 (3); 251-281, 1994.
15. National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction, 'NABER Analyzes Uses of Human Fetal Oocytes and Ovarian Tissue', NABER Report 1 (3); 2-3, 1995.
16. P. Singer, H. Kuhse, S. Buckle, K. Dawson, P. Kisimba, eds. Embryo Experimentation pp. 227-236, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1009.
17. A. Sutton, 'The British Law on Assisted Reproduction: A Liberal Law by Comparison with Many Other European Laws', Ethics and Medicine 12 (2); 41-45, 1996; B.A. Lieberman, P.L. Matson and F. Hamer, 'The UK Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 - How Well Is It Functioning?', Human Reproduction 9 (9); 1779-1782, 1994.
18. A. Sutton, 'The British Law on Assisted Reproduction: A Liberal Law by Comparison with Many Other European Laws', Ethics and Medicine 12 (2); 41-45, 1996; B.A. Lieberman, P.L. Matson and F. Hamer, 'The UK Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 - How Well Is It Functioning?', Human Reproduction 9 (9); 1779-1782, 1994.
19. P. Singer, 'Making Laws on Making Babies', Hastings Center Report 15 (4); 5-6, 1985; K.J. Dawson and J.F. Leeton, 'The Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia: Issues and Solutions', Medical Journal of Australia 163 (4); 204-206, 1995.
20. P. Singer, 'Making Laws on Making Babies', Hastings Center Report 15 (4); 5-6, 1985; K.J. Dawson and J.F. Leeton, 'The Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia: Issues and Solutions', Medical Journal of Australia 163 (4); 204-206, 1995.
21. M.D. Kirby, 'Reproductive Technology and Law Reform', Medical Journal of Australia 161 (10); 580-581, 1994.
22. F. Goldhill, 'The United Kingdom's Experience with a Regulatory Body', Women's Health Issues 6 (3); 122-129, 1996.
23. B.A. Lieberman, P.L. Matson and F. Hamer, 'The UK Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 - How Well Is It Functioning?' Human Reproduction 9 (9); 1779-1782, 1994.
24. Canada, Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies Proceed with Care, 2 vols, Canada Communications Group, Ottawa, Canada, 1993.
25. See Reference 15 at pp. 43-44.
26. See Reference 18 at p. 123.
27. P. Baird, 'Open Discussion', Women's Health Issues 6 (3); 128, 1996.
28. K.J. Dawson and J.F. Leeton, 'The Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Australia: Issues and Solutions', Medical Journal of Australia, 163 (4); 204-206, 1995.
29. C.B. Cohen and A. Jonsen, 'Ethical Advice in Reproductive Medicine', Fertility and Sterility 61 (2); 12, 1994.
30. P. Lauritzen, Pursuing Parenthood: Ethical Issues in Assisted Reproduction pp. 3-25, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1993.
31. J. Robertson, 'A View in Favor of Preserving Procreative Liberty', Women's Health Issues 6(3); 140-144, 1996.
32. M. Warnok, A Question of Life. The Warnock Report on Human Fertilization and Embryology p. 2, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985.
33. A.M. Capron and M.J. Radin, 'Choosing Family Law over Contract Law as a Paradigm for Surrogate Motherhood', Law, Medicine and Health Care 16 (1-2); 34-43, 1988.
34. J.A. Robertson, 'Procreative Liberty and the Control of Conception, Pregnancy and Childbirth', Virginia Law Review 69; 405-464, 1983.
35. See Reference 8 at pp. 19-27.
36. B. Steinbock, 'Regulating Assisted Reproductive Technologies: An Ethical Framework', Women's Health Issues 6 (3); 128, 1996.
37. A. Allen, 'Privacy, Surrogacy, and the Baby M Case', Georgetown Law Journal 76; 1759-61, 1988.
38. P. Baird, 'The Recommendations of the Canadian Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies', Women's Health issues 6 (3); 128, 1996.
39. See Reference 3 at p. 18.
40. C.B. Cohen, 'Parents Anonymous', in C.B. Cohen, ed., New Ways of Making Babies: The Case of Egg Donation pp. 88-105, Indiana and Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.
41. B.M. Knoppers and S. LeBris, 'Recent Advances in Medically Assisted Conception: Legal, Ethical and Social Issues', American Journal of Law and Medicine 17; 330-361, 1991.
42. See Reference 6.
43. See Reference 11 at pp. 253-258.
44. See Reference 11 at pp. 285-290, 299-300.
45. See Reference 11 at pp. 300-301.
46. See Reference 20, vol 1 at p. xxxv.
47. J. Fletcher, 'Artificial Insemination in Lesbians', Archives of Internal Medicine 145; 419-20, 1985.
48. C.B. Cohen and E.L. McCloskey, 'Private Bioethics Forums: Counterpoint to Government Bodies', Kennedy Institute of 'Ethics Journal 4 (3); 283-289, 1994.