Polish retention of new aesthetic restorative materials over time

Singapore Dental Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 39-43

  Yap, Siang Hui ^a,d   Yap, Adrian U J ^a,b   Teo, Chin Keong ^a   Ng, Jing Jing ^c  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c Health Promotion Board Singapore   (Singapore)

^d SINGHEALTH POLYCLINICS   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Nanofill and ormocer composites; Nanomer technology; Polish retention

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; GLASS IONOMER; WATER;

ARTICLE; DEVICE;

CERAMICS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; NANOSTRUCTURES; PARTICLE SIZE; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILANES; SILICON DIOXIDE; SILOXANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; WATER; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 11844301386     PISSN: 03775291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Filtek Supreme Technical Profile. St Paul, Minnesota, USA: 3M-EPSE.
2. Admira Technical Profile. Cuxhaven, Germany: Voco.
3. Shintani H, Satiy J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater 1985;1:225-7.
4. Dunkin RT, Chambers DW. Gingival response to class V composite resins restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;106:482-4.
5. Chan KC, Fuller JL, Hormati AA. The ability of foods to stain two composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:542-5.
6. Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite surface after various finishing procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975;91:101-6.
7. Larato DC. Influence of a composite resin restoration on the gingiva. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:402-4.
8. Strassler HE, Bauman G. Current concepts in polishing composite resins. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1993;5(3 Suppl 1):12-7.
9. Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, Lloyd CH. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 1996;24:141-8.
10. Yap AU, Low JS, Ong KL. Effect of food-simulating liquids on surface characteristics of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2000;25:170-8.
11. Söderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlscheweiger W, Bergman M. Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:1248-54.
12. Øysæd H, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and filler characteristics of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 1986;65:1315-8.
13. Øilo G. Biodegradation of dental composites/glass ionomer cements. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:50-4.
14. Söderholm KJ. Leaking of fillers in dental composites. J Dent Res 1983;63:126-30.
15. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-69.
16. Jung M, Volt S, Klimek J. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent 2003;28:53-9.
17. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2003;19:12-8.
18. Yap AU, Tan WS, Yeo JC, Yap WY, Ong SB. Surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer cements: effects of finishing/polishing systems. Oper Dent 2002;27:381-6.
19. Wilder AD, Swift EJ, May KN, Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent 2000;28:367-73.
20. Yap AU, Mok YY. Surface finish of new hybrid aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 2002;27:161-6.
21. Yap AU, Chandra SP, Chung SM, Lim CT. Changes in flexural properties of composite restoratives after aging in water. Oper Dent 2002;27:468-74.
22. Yap AU, Teoh SH, Tan KB. Influence of water exposure on three-body wear of composite restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:547-53.
23. Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composites in water - effect of degree of conversion, filler volume and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;42:465-72.
24. Kao EC. Influence of food-simulating solvents on resin composites and glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1989;5:201-8.
25. Turssi CP, Hara AT, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL. Effect of storage media upon the surface micromorphology of resin-based restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:864-71.
26. Turssi CP, Hara AT, Magalhaes CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL. Influence of storage regime prior to abrasion on surface topography of restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;65B:227-32.
27. Leung VW, Darvell BW. Artificial saliva for in-vitro studies of dental materials. J Dent 1997;25:475-84.
28. Yap AU, Pek YS, Cheang P. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1-8.
29. Croll TP. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in paediatric dentistry. Quintessence Int 1998;29:697-703.
30. Mount GJ. Clinical requirements for a successful "sandwich" - dentin to glass ionomer cement to composite resin. Aust Dent J 1989;34:259-65.
31. Leirskar J, Nordbø H, Mount GJ, Ngo H. The influence of resin coating on the shear punch strength of a high strength auto-cure glass ionomer. Dent Mater 2003;19:87-91.
32. Okada K, Tosaki S, Hirota K, Hume WR. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva. Dent Mater 2001;17:34-9.