Means of assessing ordinal interactions in social psychology: The case of sexism in judgments of social power

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1857-1877

  Elias, Steven M ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT MONTGOMERY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11844256968     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02589.x     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Bobko, P. (1986). A solution to some dilemmas when testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 323-326.
3. Brett, J. M., & Stroh, L. K. (1997). Jumping ship: Who benefits from an external labor market strategy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 331-341.
4. Carli, L. I. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81-99.
5. Cropanzano, R., & Prehar, C. A. (2001). Emerging justice concerns in an era of changing psychological contracts. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Vol. 11. From theory to practice (pp. 245-269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 788-827). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
7. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
9. Elias, S. M., & Loomis, R. J. (2004). The effect of instructor gender and race/ ethnicity on gaining compliance in the classroom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 937-958.
10. Elias, S. M., & Mace, B. L. (in press). Social power in the classroom: Student attributions for compliance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
11. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
12. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics (5th ed.). Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
13. Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 561-567.
14. Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Towards a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 99-110.
15. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
16. Koslowsky, M., & Schwarzwald, J. (2001). The power interaction model: Theory, methodology, and empirical applications. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 195-214). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
17. Lyness, K. S., & Thompson, D. E. (1997). Above the glass ceiling? A comparison of matched samples of female and male executives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 359-375.
18. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
19. Peterson, W. C. (1994). Silent depression: Twenty-five years of wage squeeze and middle-class decline. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
20. Podsakoff, P. M., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven's bases of social power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387-411.
21. Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 51-88.
22. Rasmussen, J. L. (1989). A Monte Carlo evaluation of Bobko's ordinal interaction analysis technique. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 242-246.
23. Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 371-382). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
24. Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 227-251.
25. Raven, B. H. (2001). Power/interaction and interpersonal influence: Experimental investigations and case studies. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 217-240). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
26. Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307-332.
27. Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1999). Gender, self-esteem, and focus of interest in the use of power strategies by adolescents in conflict situations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 15-32.
28. Strube, M. J., & Bobko, P. (1989). Testing hypotheses about ordinal interactions: Simulations and further comments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 247-252.
29. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
30. Thorne, B. M. (1989). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
31. Tsui, A. S., & Gutek, B. A. (2000). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
32. Whittelsey, F. C. (1993). Why women pay more: How to avoid marketplace perils. Washington, DC: Center for Study of Responsive Law.