Spongiacysteine, a novel cysteine derivative from marine sponge Spongia sp.

Chemistry Letters

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1262-1263

  Kobayashi, Keiko ^a   Shimogawa, Hiroki ^a   Sakakura, Akira ^a   Teruya, Toshiaki ^a   Suenaga, Kiyotake ^a   Kigoshi, Hideo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLASTICIDIN S; CYSTEINE DERIVATIVE; KASUGAMYCIN; SPONGIACYSTEINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; DRUG STRUCTURE; FUNGUS; NONHUMAN; PYRICULARIA ORYZAE; RICE BLAST; SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 11844254446     PISSN: 03667022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1246/cl.2004.1262     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. H. Kigoshi, H. Niwa, K. Yamada, T. J. Stout, and J. Clardy, Tetrahedron Lett., 32, 2427 (1991).
2. This sponge was identified as a new species in Spongia by Professor Patricia R. Bergquist, the University of Auckland.
3. -1.
4. I. Ohtani, T. Kusumi, Y. Kashman, and H. Kakisawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 4092 (1991).
5. A. Fontana, M. C. Gonzalez, M. Gavagnin, J. Templado, and G. Cimino, Tetrahedron Lett., 41, 429 (2000).
6. In the modified Mosher's method, the effects of a MTPA ester were thought to appear more strongly at the γ- and ε-hydrogens than at the β- and δ-hydrogens in acyclic compounds. In spongiacysteine (1), we could conclude that H-4 was strongly influenced by the MTPA ester at C-2. On the other hand, H-3 was influenced by the MTPA ester at C-5. The positional differences of the effect of the MTPA group are found in many literatures. See: T. Kusumi, T. Ooi, and H. Uchimura, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 3127 (1994); T. Kusumi, H. Takahashi, P. Xu, T. Fukushima, Y. Asakawa, T. Hashimoto, Y. Kan, and Y. Inouye, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 4397 (1994); K. Kouda, T. Ooi, and T. Kusumi, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 3005 (1999).
7. In the modified Mosher's method, the effects of a MTPA ester were thought to appear more strongly at the γ- and ε-hydrogens than at the β- and δ-hydrogens in acyclic compounds. In spongiacysteine (1), we could conclude that H-4 was strongly influenced by the MTPA ester at C-2. On the other hand, H-3 was influenced by the MTPA ester at C-5. The positional differences of the effect of the MTPA group are found in many literatures. See: T. Kusumi, T. Ooi, and H. Uchimura, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 3127 (1994); T. Kusumi, H. Takahashi, P. Xu, T. Fukushima, Y. Asakawa, T. Hashimoto, Y. Kan, and Y. Inouye, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 4397 (1994); K. Kouda, T. Ooi, and T. Kusumi, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 3005 (1999).
8. In the modified Mosher's method, the effects of a MTPA ester were thought to appear more strongly at the γ- and ε-hydrogens than at the β- and δ-hydrogens in acyclic compounds. In spongiacysteine (1), we could conclude that H-4 was strongly influenced by the MTPA ester at C-2. On the other hand, H-3 was influenced by the MTPA ester at C-5. The positional differences of the effect of the MTPA group are found in many literatures. See: T. Kusumi, T. Ooi, and H. Uchimura, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 3127 (1994); T. Kusumi, H. Takahashi, P. Xu, T. Fukushima, Y. Asakawa, T. Hashimoto, Y. Kan, and Y. Inouye, Tetrahedron Lett., 35, 4397 (1994); K. Kouda, T. Ooi, and T. Kusumi, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 3005 (1999).
9. a) M. Hikota, H. Tone, K. Horita, and O. Yonemitsu, J. Org. Chem., 55, 7 (1990).
10. b) J. Inanaga, K. Hirata, H. Saeki, T. Katsuki, and M. Yamaguchi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 52, 1989 (1979).
11. 3, 3H), 2.72 (dd, J = 2.6, 15.3 Hz, H-3′β, 1H), 2.28 (dd, J = 6.9, 14.8 Hz, H-2″α, 1H), 2.22 (dd, J = 6.8, 14.8 Hz, H-2″β, 1H), 2.17 (m, H-3″, 1H), 1.65-1.20 (m, H-4, H-6, H-7, 6H), 1.45 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, H-1, 3H), 0.98 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-4″, 3H), 0.97 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-5″, 3H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, H-8, 3H).
12. W. Keller-Schierlein, M. L. Mihailovie, and V. Prelog, Helv. Chim. Acta, 26, 305 (1959).
13. a) M. Tokunaga, J. F. Larrow, F. Kakiuchi, and E. N. Jacobsen, Science, 227, 936 (1997).
14. b) S. E. Schaus, B. D. Brandes, J. F. Larrow, M. Tokunaga, K. B. Hansen, A. E. Gould, M. E. Furrow, and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 1307 (2002).
15. E. D. Mihelich, K. Daniels, and D. J. Eickhoff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103, 7690 (1981).
16. D -115 (c 0.02, MeOH). The difference in the values between the natural and synthetic samples may be due to an error in the measurement of the natural specimen due to lack of the sample.
17. T. Ishiyama, I. Hara, M. Matsuoka, K. Sato, S. Shimada, R. Izawa, T. Hashimoto, M. Hamada, Y. Okami, T. Takeuchi, and H. Umezawa, J. Antibiot., Ser. A, 18, 115 (1965).