Partnership as an intervention strategy in self-managing schools

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 249-274

  Timperley, Helen S ^a   Robinson, Viviane M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11844251323     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/sesi.14.3.249.15843     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, G.L. (1998). Toward authentic participation: Deconstructing the discourses of participatory reforms in education. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 571-606.
2. Annan, B. (1999). Strengthening education in Mangere and Otara. Summary of the SEMO annual report: The evolution of a 3-way partnership, schooling and development project. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
3. Beattie, N. (1989). Parents as a new found land: Reflections on formal parent participation in five polities (ED308570).
4. Bryk, A.S. (1999). Policy lessons from Chicago's experience with decentralization. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy (pp. 67-128). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
5. Butterworth, G., & Butterworth, S. (1998). Reforming education: The New Zealand experience 1984-1996. Palmerston North, NZ: Dunmore Press.
6. Crozier, G. (1998). Parents and schools: Partnership or surveillance? Journal of Educational Policy, 13(1), 125-136.
7. Datnow, A. (1999). How schools choose externally developed reform designs. Report No. 35. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University.
8. Education Review Office. (1996). Improving schooling in Mangere and Otara. Wellington, NZ: Education Review Office.
9. Edwards, A., & Warin, J. (1999). Parental involvement in raising the achievement of primary school pupils: Why bother? Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 325-341.
10. Fiske, E.B., & Ladd, H.F. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11. Hatch, T. (1998). The differences in theory that matter in the practice of school improvement. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 3-31.
12. McGowan, T.M., & Powell, J.H. (1996). In search of autonomy: Teachers' aspirations and expectations from a school-university collaborative. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(3), 249-260.
13. McLaughlin, M.W. (1990). The RAND change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11-16.
14. Newmann, F.M., King, M.B., & Rigdon, M. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 41-74.
15. New Zealand Government. (1989). Education Act (Public Act 1989, No. 80). Wellington, New Zealand.
16. Peters, J., Williams, D., & Johnson, B. (1999). Academics working with schools: Revealing the tensions. Journal of Education for Teaching, 25(2), 123-133.
17. Pole, C., & Chawla-Duggan, R. (1996). Introduction. In C. Pole & R. Chawla-Duggan (Eds.), Reshaping education in the 1990s: Perspectives on secondary schooling (pp. 1-8). London: The Falmer Press.
18. Robinson, V.M.J. (1994). The practical promise of critical research in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(1), 56-76.
19. Rogers, D., & Chung, H. (1983). 110 Livingston Street revisited: Decentralization in action. New York: New York University Press.
20. Smith, K. (1997). Schooling in Mangere and Otara: A strategy for improvement (Report to Hon. Wyatt Creech, Minister of Education). Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Education.
21. Stevens, D. (1999). The ideal, real and surreal in school-university partnerships: Reflections of a boundary spanner. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(3), 287-299.
22. Stoll, L. (1999). Realising our potential: Understanding and developing capacity for lasting improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 503-532.
23. Taskforce to Review Education Administration. (1988). Administrating for excellence: Effective administration in education. Wellington, NZ: Author.
24. Timperley, H., Robinson, V., & Bullard, T. (1999). Strengthening education in Mangere and Otara: First evaluation report, Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland.
25. U.K. Department for Education. (1992). Choice and diversity. A new framework for schools (CM2021). London: HMSO.
26. Vincent, C., & Tomlinson, S. (1997). Home-school relationships: "The swarming of disciplinary mechanism?" British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 361-377.
27. Whitty, G. (1997). Marketization, the state, and the re-formation of the teaching profession. In A.H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A.S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 299-310). Oxford: Oxford University Press.