An enhanced approach for shape optimization using an adaptive algorithm

Finite Elements in Analysis and Design

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 521-543

  Schmid, F ^a   Hirschen, K ^a   Meynen, S ^a   Schafer M ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

ANSYS; Evolutionary algorithm; MATLAB; Monte Carlo simulation; Parameter adaption; Shape optimization

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRADIENT METHODS; HEURISTIC METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PARETO PRINCIPLE; PROBLEM SOLVING; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

ANSYS; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; MATLAB; PARAMETER ADAPTION; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 11844251254     PISSN: 0168874X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2004.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. J. Nocedal, S.J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, Springer Series in Operations Research, Springer, Berlin, 1999.
2. K. Deb Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms 2001 Wiley New York
3. E. Zitzler Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization 2002 CIMNE Barcelona, Spain
4. B. Mohammadi, and O. Pironneau Shape optimization in fluid mechanics Annu. Rev. Int. J. Fluid Mech. 36 11 2004 1 25
5. VDI Berichte 1526, Computational Intelligence im industriellen Einsatz, VDI/VDE Tagung Baden-Baden, 2000.
6. T. Streilein, and J. Hillmann Stochastische Simulation und Optimierung am Beispiel VW Phaeton 2002 VDI-Tagung Würzburg
7. R. Reuter, and R. Hoffmann Bewertung von Berechnungsergebnissen mittels Stochastischer Simulationsverfahren 2002 EASi Engineering GmbH Alzenau, Germany
8. R. Reuter, R. Hoffmann, and J. Kamarajan Application of Stochastic Simulation in the Automotive Industry 2001 EASi Engineering GmbH Alzenau, Germany
9. M. Meywerk Optimierung in der Fahrzeugindustrie Methoden und Anwendungen 2000 Volkswagen AG Wolfsburg
10. C. Bucher, Application of probability based concepts in computational mechanics, European Conference on Computational Mechanics ECCM 1999, München, Germany.
11. M. Papadrakakis, N.D. Lagaros, Y. Tsompanakis, and V. Plevris Large scale structural optimization computational methods and optimization algorithms Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. State Art Rev. 8 3 2001 239 301
12. J.E. Hurtado, and D.A. Alvarez Neural-network-based reliability analysis a comparative study Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191 2001 113 132
13. S. Venkataraman, R.T. Haftka, Structural optimization: what has Moore's law done for us?, 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Denver, 2002.
14. I. Rechenberg Evolutionsstrategie. Optimierung Technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der Biologischen Evolution 1973 Friedrich Frohmann Verlag
15. F.Y. Edgeworth Mathematical Psychics 1881 Kegan Paul London
16. V. Pareto The new theory of economics J. Polit. Econom. 5 4 1897 485 502
17. D.H. Wolpert, and W.G. Macready No free lunch theorems for optimization IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Comput. 1 1 1996 67 82
18. No Free Lunch Theorems, A web resource: http://www.no-free-lunch.org/.
19. E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, C.M. Fonseca, V. Grunert da Fonseca, Why quality assessment of multiobjective optimizers is difficult, GECCO 2002: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 2002, pp. 666-674.
20. D.A. van Veldhuizen, Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: classifications, analysis, and new innovations, Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Engineering of the Air Force Institute of Technology, Air University, 1999.
21. J. Jahn Vector Optimization 2004 Springer Berlin
22. I. Wegener Komplexitätstheorie. Grenzen der Effizienz von Algorithmen 2003 Springer Berlin
23. M. Schwehm, Globale Optimierung mit Massiv Parallelen Genetischen Algorithmen, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Dissertation, 1997.
24. S. Jakobs Quantitative Analyse des klassischen genetischen Algorithmus 1995 RWTH Aachen Dissertation
25. T. Bäck Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice 1996 Oxford University Press Oxford
26. K. Deb, Genetic algorithms for optimization, Technical Report, Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, KanGAL Report Number 2001002, 2001.
27. I. Das, and J. Dennis Closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems Struct. Optim. 14 1997 63 69
28. R.E. Steuer, and R.U. Choo An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming Math. Program. 26 1983 326 344
29. K. Deb, T. Goel, Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for engineering shape design, Technical Report, Kanpur Genetic Algorithms Laboratory Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, KanGAL Report No. 2000003, 2000.
30. J. Horn, Multicriterion decision making, in: T. Bäck, D. Fogel, Z. Michalewicz (Eds.), Handbook of Evolutionary Computation, 1997, pp. F1.9:1-15.
31. M. Papadrakakis, and N.D. Lagaros Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191 2002 3491 3507
32. W. Annicchiarico, and M. Cerrolaza Finite elements, genetic algorithms and β -splines a combined technique for shape optimization Finite Elements Anal. Design 33 2 1999 125 141
33. J.A. Samareh, A Survey of Shape Parameterization Techniques, CEAS/AIAA/ICASE/NASA Langley International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Williamsburg, 1999.
34. H. Langer, T. Pühlhofer, H. Baier, An approach for shape and topology optimization integrating CAD parameterization and evolutionary algorithms, AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, 2002.
35. S.Y. Chen, Integrating ANSYS with modern numerical optimization technology - Part II: a reverse parametric modeling approach for structural shaping optimization, Technical Paper, 2002.
36. W. Schnell, D. Gross, and W. Hauger Technische Mechanik II fourth ed. 1992 Springer Berlin