An editor's view of telemedicine

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 311-317

  Wootton, Richard ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b ROYAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; REVIEW; TELECOMMUNICATION;

BIBLIOMETRICS; PERIODICALS; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 11444256369     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/1357633042602116     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. Updated November 2003. See http://www.icmje.org. Last checked 6 September 2004
2. World Association of Medical Editors. WAME policy statements. See http://www.wame.org/wamestmt.htm. Last checked 6 September 2004
3. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. Guidance for Authors. See http:// www.rsmpress.co.uk/jtt_gfa.htm. Last checked 6 September 2004
4. Stanberry B. Legal and Ethical Aspects of Telemedicine. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 1998
5. Wootton R, Craig J. Introduction to Telemedicine. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 1999
6. Wootton R, Oakley A. Teledermatology. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2002
7. Wootton R, Yellowlees P, McLaren P. Telepsychiatry and e-Mental Health. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2003
8. Wootton R, Batch J. Telepediatrics: Telemedicine and Child Health. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2004
9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-10
10. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. Journal of the American Medical Association 1990;263: 1385-9
11. Wootton R. Telemedicine: a cautious welcome. British Medical Journal 1996;313:1375-7
12. Wootton R. Recent advances: telemedicine. British Medical Journal 2001;323:557-60
13. 2004 summary statistics and acknowledgements. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2004;10:369-72
14. Orwell G. Politics and the English Language. First published 1946. Reprinted in Selected Essays. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1957. See http://orwell.ru/library/essays/index_en. Last checked 7 September 2004
15. Dahlin MP, Watcher G, Engle WM, Henderson J. 2001 Report on U.S. Telemedicine Activity. Portland, OR: ATSP, 2001
16. Moser PL, Hauffe H, Lorenz IH, et al. Publication output in telemedicine during the period January 1964 to July 2003. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2004;10:72-7
17. Youngberry K. Telemedicine research and MEDLINE. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2004;10:121-3
18. Institute for Scientific Information 2002 data. See http:// isi10.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi. Last checked 6 September 2004 (subscription service)
19. Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 1997;314: 498-502
20. Walter G, Bloch S, Hunt G, Fisher K. Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality. Medical Journal of Australia 2003;178:280-1
21. Opthof T. Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovascular Research 1997;33:1-7
22. Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative. See http:// www.healthinternetwork.org/. Last checked 6 September 2004
23. Scott L. Will healthcare accept the 'virtual doctor'? Maybe, but telemedicine's cost-effectiveness remains in question. Modern Healthcare 1994;24:34-5, 38, 40-1