Positive pressure versus pressure support ventilation at different levels of PEEP using the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 804-808

  von Goedecke, A ^a   Brimacombe, J ^b   Keller, C ^a   Hoermann, C ^a   Loeckinger, A ^a   Rieder, J ^a   Kleinsasser, A ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia: Laryngeal mask airway; PEEP; Pressure support ventilation; Ventilation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; OXYGEN; PROPOFOL; SEVOFLURANE;

ADULT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; AIRWAY RESISTANCE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING RATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; END TIDAL CARBON DIOXIDE TENSION; EXPIRATORY FLOW RATE; EXPIRED AIR; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INSPIRATORY CAPACITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; LUNG COMPLIANCE; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; LUNG GAS EXCHANGE; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; OXYGEN TENSION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PREMEDICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT PARAMETERS; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 11444252142     PISSN: 0310057X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0403200612     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Iizuka T, Ishii N. The efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway during positive-pressure ventilation under general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:S240.
2. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA "ProSeal" - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:650-654.
3. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:104-109.
4. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal with the Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:289-295.
5. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Hörmann C. Pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure with the laryngeal mask airway: A randomized crossover study of anesthetized adult patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 92:1621-1623.
6. Capdevila X, Biboulet P, Vallee M, Drissi S, D'Athis F. Pressure support ventilation with a laryngeal mask during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:A1226.
7. Berry A, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Verghese C. Pulmonary airway resistance with the endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:295-297.
8. Keller C, Brimacombe JR. Bronchial mucus transport velocity in paralyzed anesthetized patients: a comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed tracheal tube. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:1280-1282.
9. Drage MP, Nunez J, Vaughan RS, Asai T. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996;51:1167-1170.
10. LMA ProSeal™ Instruction manual. 1st Ed. Henley-on-Thames: The Laryngeal Mask Company Ltd, 2000.
11. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Keller K, Morris R. A comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82:286-287.
12. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:127-129.
13. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Puehringer F. A fibreoptic scoring system to assess the position of laryngeal mask airway devices. Interobserver variability and a comparison between the standard, flexible and intubating laryngeal mask airways. AINS 2000; 35:692-694.
14. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Berry A, Mitchell S. Assessing ProSeal laryngeal mask positioning: The suprasternal notch test. Anesth Analg 2002; 94:1375.
15. Petros AJ, Lamond CT, Bennett D. The Bicore pulmonary monitor. A device to assess the work of breathing while weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anaesthesia 1993; 48:985-988.
16. Banner MJ, Kirby RR, Blanch PB, Layon AJ. Decreasing imposed work of the breathing apparatus to zero using pressure-support ventilation. Crit Care Med 1993; 21:1333-1338.
17. Thomas AM, Turner RE, Tenholder MF. Esophageal pressure measurements in cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Chest 1997; 112:829-832.
18. Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics: Part 5, Statistical inference techniques for hypothesis testing with non-parametric data. Ann Emerg Med 1990; 19:1054-1059.
19. Bosek V, Roy L, Smith RA. Pressure support improves efficiency of spontaneous breathing during inhalation anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8:9-12.
20. Keidan I, Fine GF, Kagawa T et al. Work of breathing during spontaneous ventilation in anesthetized children: a comparative study among the face mask, laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:1381-1388.
21. Kim ES, Bishop MJ. Endotracheal intubation, but not laryngeal mask airway insertion, produces reversible bronchoconstriction. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:391-394.
22. Parry MG, Glaisyer H, Lee J, Cox M, Patient P, Bailey P. The use of continuous positive airway pressure via the laryngeal mask airway following microlaryngeal surgery. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78:A26.
23. Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42:1017-1023.
24. Ferrari LR, Goudsouzian NG. The use of the laryngeal mask airway in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:310-313.
25. Tait AR, Pandit UA, Voepel-Lewis T et al. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in children with upper respiratory tract infections: a comparison with endotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:706-711.
26. Tartari S, Fratantonio R, Bomben R et al. Laryngeal mask vs tracheal tube in pediatric anesthesia in the presence of upper respiratory tract infection. Minerva Anesthesiol 2000; 66:439-443.