Trial in international criminal jurisdictions: Battle or scrutiny?

European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 55-59

  Tochilovsky, Vladimir ^a  

^a Office of the Prosecuto   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142297066     PISSN: 09289569     EISSN: 15718174     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/157181798X00247     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. See, for instance, D. Ntanda Nsereko, Rules of procedure and evidence of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 5 Crim. L.F., 508;
2. D.M. Sweeney, Internationaa Standards of Fairnesss Criminal Procedure, and the Internationaa Criminal Court (paper presented to the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court), p. 3.
3. One of them, Virginia Morris (US), was a member of the Drafting Committee.
4. V. Morris and M.P. Schartt 1 An Insider's Guide to the Internationaa Criminal Tribunal lor the Former Yugoslavia, (1995)) pp. 246-247.
5. American Bar Association's Standards for Criminal Justice, 2nd ed. (Boston 1986)) at Standard 6-11.
6. Charter of the Internationaa Military Tribunal in the Trials of War Criminall before the Nurembeeg Military Tribunall under Control Councii Law No. 10, Vol. 1, (1949)) p. XIV.
7. Basic Documents, ICTY 1995, Rule 89 of the Rules.
8. Prosecution's Motion to Reconsider and Rescind the Order of 28 January 1997 for the Disclosurr of Witness Statements, The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu (ICTR-96-4-T), 4 February 1997, p. 10.
9. Decision on the Prosecutor's Motion to Reconsider and Rescind the Order of 28 January 1997, The Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayess (ICTR-96-4-T), 6 March 1997, p. 3.
10. Decision on the Defence Motion on Hearsay, The Prosecutor v. Tadic (IT-94-1-T)) 5 August 1996, paragraph 19.
11. Opinion and Judgmentt The Prosecutor v. Tadic (IT-94-1-T), 7 May 1997, paragraphh 555-556.
12. Rule 85 of the ICTY Rules and Rule 85 of the Rules of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.
13. Draft Set of Rules of Procedurr and Evidence for the International Criminal Court, Working Paper submiited by Australia and the Netherlands, UN, A/AC.249/L.2, 26 July 1996, Rule 100 (B).
14. Opinion and Judgmentt The Prosecutor v. Tadic (IT-94-1-T), 7 May 1997, paragraphh 238 and 241.
15. See proposall to Article 44 of the Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court in the Report of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Courtt Volume II, General Assembly Official Recordss Fifty-first Session, Supplement No. 22A (A/51/22), NY, 1996, p. 207.
16. Mirjan R. Damaška, The faces of justice and state authority. A comparative approach to the Legal Process (New Haven, 1986)) p. 201.