Control of an alternating aerobic-anoxic activated sludge system - Part 2: Optimization using a linearized model

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 279-289

  Kim, Hyunook ^a   McAvoy, T J ^a   Anderson, J S ^a   Hao, O J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternating aerobic anoxic; Nitrogen control; Optimization; Process control

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; AERATION; AEROBIC REACTOR; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; MODEL; NITRIFICATION; ONLINE ANALYSIS; ONLINE CONTROL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REACTION TIME; SIMULATION;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; AMMONIA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EFFLUENTS; ERRORS; LINEAR SYSTEMS; NITRATES; NITROGEN REMOVAL; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; WATER AERATION;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE MODEL; ALTERNATING AEROBIC-ANOXIC;

PROCESS CONTROL;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; DENITRIFICATION; NITRIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 0034049401     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0661(99)00173-2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Anderson J.S., Kim H., McAvoy T.J., Hao O.J. Control of an alternating aerobic-anoxic activated sludge system - Part 1: Development of a linearization-based modeling approach. Control Engineering Practice. 8(3):2000;271-278.
2. Batchelor B. Kinetic analysis of alternative configurations for single-sludge nitrification/denitrification. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation. 54(11):1982;1493-1504.
3. Batchelor B. Simulation of single-sludge nitrogen removal. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 109(1):1983;1-16.
4. Culter, C., & Ranaker, B. (1979). Dynamic matrix control - a computer control algorithm. A.I.Ch.E. National Meeting, Paper No. 51b, Houston, TX.
5. Hao O.J., Huang J. Alternating aerobic-anoxic process for nitrogen removal. Performance evaluation Water Environmental Research. 68(1):1996;83-93.
6. Heduit A., Duchene P., Sintes L. Optimization of nitrogen removal in small activated sludge plants. Water Science Technology. 22(3/4):1990;123-130.
7. Henze, M., Grady, C.P.L., Gujer, W., Marais, G.v.R., & Matsuo, T. (1986). Activated Sludge Model No. 1, IAWPRC Sci. Tech. Report No. 1, London, England (33 pp).
8. Huang J., Hao O.J. Alternating aerobic-anoxic process for nitrogen removal: dynamic modeling. Water Environmental Research. 68(1):1996;94-104.
9. Ip S.Y., Bridger J.S., Mills N.F. Effect of alternating aerobic and anaerobic conditions on the economics of the activated sludge system. Water Science Technology. 19(5/6):1987;918-919.
10. Klapwijk A., Brouwer H., Vrolijk E., Kujawa K. Control of intermittently aerated nitrogen removal plants by detection endpoints of nitrification and denitrification using respirometry only. Water Research. 32(5):1998;1700-1703.
11. McAvoy, T.J., Anderson, J.S., Hao, O.J., Boger, Z., & Kim, H. (1999). Optimization and control of alternating aerobic/anoxic activated sludge operation. Proceedings of the 14th world congress, international federation of automatic control, vol. N, Beijing, China, (pp. 289-294).
12. Nakajima J., Kaneko M. Practical performance of nitrogen removal in small-scale sewage treatment plants operated in intermittent aeration mode. Water Science Technology. 24(4/6):1991;709-718.
13. Sakai Y., Miama T., Takahashi F. Simultaneous removal of organic and nitrogen compounds in intermittently aerated activated sludge process using magnetic separation. Water Research. 31(8):1997;2113-2116.
14. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1995). (19th ed), Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.