The attentional blink is susceptible to concurrent perceptual processing demands

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 357-381

  Christmann, Christoph ^a   Leuthold, Hartmut ^b  

^a CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142277189     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000350     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Arnell, K. M., & Jolicœur, P. (1999). The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 630-648.
2. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.
3. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (2001). The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 20-35). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Dutta, A. (1995). Experimental run time system: Software for developing and running experiments on IBM-compatible PCs. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 516-519.
5. Enns, J. T., Visser, T. A. W., Kawahara, J., & Di Lollo, V. (2001). Visual masking and task switchingin the attentional blink. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 65-81). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Fischer, B. (1998). Attention in saccades. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 289-305). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Isaak, M. I., Shapiro, K., & Martin, J. (1999). The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: Tests of an interference model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1774-1792.
8. Jaskowski, P., Pruszewicz, A., & Swidzinski, P. (1990). VEP latency and some properties of simple motor reaction time distribution. Psychological Research, 52, 28-34.
9. 1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014-1032.
10. Jolicœur, P. (1999). Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1097-1113.
11. Jolicœur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202.
12. Jolicœur, P., Dell'Acqua, R., & Crebolder, J. M. (2001). The attentional blink bottleneck. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 82-99). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Kawahara, J., Di Lollo, V., & Enns, J. T. (2001). Attentional requirements in visual detection and identification: Evidence from the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 969-984.
14. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (2001). Multiple sources of interference in dual-task performance: The cases of the attentional blink and the psychological refractory period. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 124-140). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Maki, W. S., Frigen, K., & Paulson, K. (1997). Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1014-1034.
16. McLaughlin, E. N., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 169-196.
17. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
18. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979-992
19. Raymond, J.E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
20. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1995). Similarity determines the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 653-662.
21. Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., & Hennighausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38, 165-174.
22. Ruthruff, E., & Pashler, H. (2001). Perceptual and central interference in dual-task performance. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 100-123). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction process. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331-354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
24. Seiffert, A. E., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1061-1073.
25. Shapiro, K. (Ed.). (2001). The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Shapiro, K., Driver, J., Ward, R., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science, 8, 95-100.
27. Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357-371.
28. Shapiro, K. L., & Terry, K. (1998). The attentional blink: The eyes have it (but so does the brain). In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 306-329). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Vaughan, H. G., Costa, L. D., & Gilden, L. (1966). The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. Vision Research, 6, 645-656
30. Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 458-469.
31. Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656-1674.
32. Ward, R., Duncan, J., & Shapiro, K. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 79-109.
33. Ward, R., Duncan, J., & Shapiro, K. (1997). Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time-course of visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 593-600.