Unconventional geometric quantum computation

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 91, Issue 18, 2003, Pages

  Zhu, Shi Liang ^a,b   Wang, Z D ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b SOUTH CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FAULT TOLERANT COMPUTER SYSTEMS; GATES (TRANSISTOR); HAMILTONIANS; LASER PULSES; LOGIC CIRCUITS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; PHASE SHIFT; QUANTUM THEORY;

GEMOETRIC QUANTUM COMPUTATIONS (GQC); QUANTUM COMPUTATIONAL TASK;

QUANTUM ELECTRONICS;

EID: 11344279653     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.187902     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. P.W. Shor, Phys. Rev. A 52, R2493 (1995); 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.R2493
2. A.M. Steane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 793 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.793
3. A.M. Steane, quant-ph/0207119.
4. P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3306 (1997); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3306
5. L.M. Duan and G.C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1953
6. M.V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 392, 45 (1984).
7. Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1593 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1593
8. J. Samuel and R. Bhandari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2339 (1988); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.2339
9. S.L. Zhu, Z.D. Wang, and Y.D. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 61, 1142 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.1142
10. S.L. Zhu and Z.D. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1076 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1076
11. S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.346
12. P. Zanardi and M. Rasetti, Phys. Lett. A 264, 94 (1999); 10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00803-8
13. J. Pachos, P. Zanardi, and M. Rasetti, Phys. Rev. A 61, 010305(R) (2002).10.1103/PhysRevA.61.010305
14. J.A. Jones, V. Vedral, A. Ekert, and G. Castagnoli, Nature (London) 403, 869 (2000); 10.1038/35002528
15. J. Du, M. Shi, J. Wu, X. Zhou, and R. Han, quan-ph/0207022.
16. G. Falci, R. Fazio, G.M. Palma, J. Siewert, and V. Vedral, Nature (London) 407, 355 (2000).10.1038/35030052
17. L.M. Duan, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Science 292, 1695 (2001).10.1126/science.1058835
18. P. Solinas, P. Zanardi, N. Zanghi, and F. Rossi, Phys. Rev. B 67, 121307 (2003); 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.121307
19. P. SolinasP. ZanardiN. ZanghiF. RossiPhys. Rev. A 67, 052309 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevA.67.052309
20. X.B. Wang and M. Keiji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 097901 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.097901
21. S.L. Zhu and Z.D. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097902 (2002); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.097902
22. S.L. ZhuZ.D. WangPhys. Rev. Lett.89, 289901(E) (2002).
23. S.L. ZhuZ.D. WangPhys. Rev. A 66, 042322 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042322
24. S.L. Zhu and Z.D. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 67, 022319 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevA.67.022319
25. A. Nazir, T.P. Spiller, and W.J. Munro, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042303 (2002); 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042303
26. A. Blais and A.-M.S. Tremblay, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012308 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012308
27. A. Carollo, I. Fuentes-Guridi, M.F. Santos, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 160402 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.160402
28. J.I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4091
29. D. Leibfried, B. DeMarco, V. Meyer, D. Lucas, M. Barrett, J. Britton, W.M. Itano, B. Jelenkovic, C. Langer, T. Rosenband, and D.J. Wineland, Nature (London) 422, 412 (2003). It seems that the reported gate was not conceptually realized to be an unconventional geometric phase gate before.10.1038/nature01492
30. G.J. Milburn, S. Schneider, and D.F.V. James, Fortschr. Phys.FPYKA6 48, 801 (2000); 10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11<801::AID-PROP801>3.0.CO;2-1
31. S. Schneider, D.F.V. James, and G.J. Milburn, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 499 (1999).10.1080/095003400148330
32. A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. A 62, 022311 (2000); 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.022311
33. A. SørensenK. MølmerPhys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1971 (1999); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1971
34. X. Wang, A. Sørensen, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3907 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3907
35. X. Wang and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032327 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032327
36. M. Hillery and M.S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A 26, 451 (1982).10.1103/PhysRevA.26.451
37. H. Kuratsuji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1687 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1687
38. W. Magnus, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 7, 649 (1954).
39. Note that in the presence of small noncyclic perturbations the gate operator 3 may be modified as (Formula presented) with (Formula presented) ((Formula presented)) the visibility being slightly less than unit, which may lead to a weak decoherence effect; but it is negligible, even inevitable. Quantitatively, for a small deviation (Formula presented) from the period (Formula presented), (Formula presented) is estimated to be (Formula presented) and the deviation of (Formula presented) is about (Formula presented).
40. A. Friedenauer and E. Sjöqvist, Phys. Rev. A 67, 024303 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevA.67.024303