Development and implementation of agri-environmental policy: English experience and lessons for Australia

Australian Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 228-242

  Fraser, Iain ^a   Hone, Phillip ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11344271253     PISSN: 13221698     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2002.10648563     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aretino, B., Holland, P., Matysek, A., and Peterson, D., 2001. Cost Sharing for Biodiversity Conservation:A Conceptual Framework Staff Research Paper. Aus Info, Canberra
2. ANOA. 1997. Commonwealth Natural Resource Management and Environment Programs. Audit Report No. 36, Performance Audit, Australian National Audit Office Canberra (www.anao.gov.au/)
3. ANOA. 2001. Performance Information for Commonwealth Financial Assistance Under the Natural Heritage Trust, Department of Agriculture. Fisheries and Forestry, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Audit Report No. 43, Performance Audit. Australian National Audit Office Canberra (www.anao.gov.au/)
4. Bates, G., 2001. A Duty of Care for the Protection of Biodiversity on Land Consultancy Report. Report to the Productivity Commission. Auslnfo, Canberra
5. Bennett, J., and Morrison, M., 2000. The Economic Analysis of Wetland Rehabilitation. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 7:48–54.
6. Binning, C., and Young, M., 1997. Motivating People—Using Management Agreements to Conserve Remnant Vegetation. National Research and Development Program on Rehabilitation, Management and Conservation of Remnant Vegetation Report 1/97, Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, Canberra
7. Bishop, K. D., and Phillips, A. A.C., 1993. Seven Steps to Market—the Development of the Market-led Approach to Countryside Conservation and Recreation. Journal of Rural Studies, 9:315–338.
8. Bromley, W. D., and Hodge, I., 1990. Private Property Rights and Presumptive Policy Entitlements:Reconsidering the Premises of Rural Policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 17:197–214.
9. Brouwer, F., Dwyer, J., and Baidock, D., 2002. “ 4 ”. In Public Concerns, Environmental Standards and Agricultural Trade Edited by:Brouwer, F, and Ervin, D. E., 57–94. European Union, Chapter, in CABI Publishing, Oxford
10. Cary, J. W., and Wilkinson, R. L., 1997. Perceived Profitability and Farmers' Conservation Behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48:13–21.
11. Chisholm, A., and Fraser, I. M., 2001. 41–60. Cattle Grazing in the Alpine National Park:Preserving Natural Capital or Cultural Heritage?, in Heritage Economics:Challenges for Heritage Conservation and Sustainable Development in the 21st Century, Conference Proceedings, Australian Heritage Commission, Canberra
12. Choe, C., and Fraser, I. M., 1999. Compliance Monitoring and Agri-Environmental Policy. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50:468–487.
13. Crosthwaite, J., 2001. 22–25. Policy Formulation—The Duty of Care and Putting the Farm First, A paper presented to the 45th Annual Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Conference, Adelaide.th January
14. Curtis, A., 2000. Landcare:Approaching the Limits of Voluntary Action. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 7:19–27.
15. DETR. 2001. Guidelines on Management Agreement Payments and Other Related Matters, Department of Environment. Transport and the Regions. London
16. Edwards, G., and Fraser, I. M., 2001. Ecological Economics, 37:313–326. (Reconsidering Agri-environmental Policy Permitted by the Uruguay Round Agreement
17. Edwards-Jones, G., Edwards-Jones, E. S., and Mitchell, K., 1995. A Comparison of Contingent Valuation Methodology and Ecological Assessment as Techniques for Incorporating
18. Ecological Goods into Land-use Decisions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38215–230.
19. Falconer, K., and Whitby, M., 1999. “ The Invisible Costs of Scheme Implementation and Administration ”. In Countryside Stewardship:Farmers, Policies and Markets Edited by:van Huyelenbroek, G., and Whitby, M., Oxford, UK:Pergamon.
20. Fraser, I. M., 1995. An Analysis of Management Agreement Bargaining Under Asymmetric Information. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46:119–137.
21. Fraser, I. M., 1996. Quasi-Markets and the Provision of Nature Conservation in Agri-Environmental Policy. European Environment, 6:95–101.
22. Garrod, G. D., and Willis, K. G., 1995. Valuing the Benefits of the South Downs Environmentally Sensitive Area. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46:160–173.
23. Garrod, G. D., and Willis, K. G., 1999. Methodological Issues in Valuing the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 15:111–1. 17
24. Hanley, N., MaeMillan, D., Wright, R., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parisson, D., and Crabtree, R., 1998. Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments:Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49:1–15.
25. Hanley, N., and MaeMillan, D., 2000. Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments:Estimating Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland:Reply. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51:129–132.
26. Hodge, I. D., 1989. Environment and Planning A, 21:1027–1036. (Compensation for Nature Conservation
27. Hodge, I., and McNally, S., 1998. Journal of Rural Studies, 14:357–367. (Evaluating Environmentally Sensitive Areas:The Value of Rural Environments and Policy Relevance
28. Industry Commission. 1998. A Full Repairing Lease. Inquiry into Ecologically Sustainable Land Management, Report No. 60 Canberra:AGPS. Industry Commission
29. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R., 1986. Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking:Entitlements in the Market. American Economic Review, 76:728–741.
30. King, M., 2002. England's Green Unpleasant Land? Why Urgent Action is Needed to Save England's Wildflower Grasslands, A Joint Report by Plantlife and Wildlife Trusts. London
31. Latacz-Lohmann, U., and van der Hamsvoort, P. C.M., 1998. Auctions as a Means of Creating a Market for Public Goods from Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49:334–345.
32. Lockwood, M., Tracey, P., and Klomp, N., 1996. Analysing Conflict Between Cultural Heritage and Nature Conservation in the Australian Alps:A CVM Approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39:357–370.
33. MAFF. 1999. Agenda 2000 CAP Reform:A New Direction for Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food. London, UK
34. MAFF. 2000a. England Rural Development Program 2000- 2006 Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. London. UK
35. MAFF. 2000b. Towards Sustainable Agriculture London, UK:Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
36. Morris, C., and Potter, C., 1995. Recruiting the New Conservationists:Farmers' Adoption of Agri-Environmental Schemes in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 11:51–63.
37. Moxey, A., White, B., and Ozanne, A., 1999. Efficient Contract Design for Agri-Environment Policy. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50:187–202.
38. National Audit Office. 1997. The Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food:Protecting Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. HC 120 1997/98, London, UK
39. OECD. 1994. Environmental Indicators:OECD Core Set Paris:Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
40. Policy Commission. 2002. London:Cabinet Office. Farming and Food:A Sustainable Future. Report of the Policy Commission on the Future of Farming and Food, UK (www.cabinet.gov.uk/farming
41. Potter, C., Cook, H., and Norman, C., 1993. The Targeting of Rural Environmental Policies:An Assessment of Agri- Environmental Schemes in the UK. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 36:199–216.
42. Scarpa, R., 2000. Contingent Valuation Versus Choice Experiments:Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland:Comment. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51:122–128.
43. Slangen, L. H.G., 1997. How to Organise Nature Production by Farmers. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 24:508–529.
44. Standing Committee on Environment and Heritage. 2001. Canberra:Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Public Good Conservation:Our Challenge for the 21st Century, Interim Report of the Inquiry into the Effects Upon Landholders and Farmers of Public Good Conservation Measures Imposed by Australian Governments, House of Representatives, The
45. Stoneham, G., Crowe, M., Piatt, S., Chaudhri, V., Soligo, J., and Strappazzon, L., 2000. Mechanisms for Biodiversity Conservation on Private Land, Working Paper. Economics Branch, Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne
46. Swinbank, A., 1999. CAP Reform and the WTO:Compatibility and Developments. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 26:389–407.
47. Vatn, A., and Bromley, D. W., 1994. Choices Without Prices Without Apologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26:129–148.
48. Webster, P., 1999. The Challenge of Sustainability at the Farm Level:Presidenlial Address. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50:317–387.
49. Whitby, M., 2000. Challenges and Options for the UK Agri-Environment:Presidential Address. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51:317–332.
50. Whitby, M., and Lowe, P., 1994. “ The Political and Economic Roots of Environmental Policy in Agriculture, Chapter I. pp 1–24 ”. In Incentives for Countryside Management:The Case of Environmentally Sensitive Areas Edited by:Whitby, M., CAB International. Wallingford
51. Willis, K., and Garrod, G., 1994. “ 9 ”. In Incentives for Countryside Management:The Case of Environmentally Sensitive Areas Edited by:Whitby, M., 179–217. The Ultimate Test:Measuring the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Chapter, in. CAB International. Wallingford
52. Wilson, G. A., and Hart, K., 2001. Farmer Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes:Towards Conservation-Orientated Thinking?. Sociologia Ruralis., 41:254–274.
53. Young, M., Gunningham, N., Elix, J., Lambert, J., Howard, B., Grabowsky, P., and McCrone, E., 1996. Reimbursing the Future:An Evaluation of Motivational Voluntary, Price-based, Property Right, and Regulatory Incentives for the Conservation of Biodiversity, Part 1 and 2, Biodiversity Series Paper No. 9, Biodiversity Unit, Department of Environment Sport and Territories. Canberra