Landcare: Approaching the limits of voluntary action

Australian Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 19-27

  Curtis, Allan ^a  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001964210     PISSN: 13221698     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2000.10648480     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alexander, H., 1995. A framework for change:the state of the community Landcare movement in Australia. The National Landcare Facilitator Project Annual Report. NLP, Canberra.
2. Brudney, J. L., 1990. Fostering volunteer programs in the public sector:Planning, initiating and managing voluntary activities. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
3. Byron, I., Curtis, A., and Lockwood, M., 1999. Providing improved support for Landcare in the Shepparton Irrigation Region. Johnstone Centre, Charles Sturt University, Albury.
4. Campbell, A., 1994. Landcare:Communities shaping the land and the future. Sydney:Allen & Unwin.
5. Chamala, S., 1995. “ Group effectiveness:from group extension methods to participative community Landcare groups. In:”. In Participative approaches to Landcare:perspectives, policies and programs. Edited by:Chamala, S., and Keith, K., Australian Academic Press, Brisbane.
6. Commonwealth of Australia. 1997. Evaluation of the Decade of Landcare Plan-National Overview. Canberra:Commonwealth of Australia.
7. Commonwealth of Australia. 1998. National Heritage Trust guide to new applications 1998–99. Canberra:Commonwealth of Australia.
8. Curtis, A., 1998. The agency/community partnership in Landcare:lessons for state-sponsored citizen resource management. Environmental Management., 22 (4):563–574.
9. Curtis, A., 1999. Landcare:Beyond onground work. Natural Resource Management., 2 (2):4–9.
10. Curtis, A., and De Lacy, T., 1995. Landcare Evaluation in Australia:towards an effective partnership between agencies, community groups and researchers. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation., 50 (1):15–20.
11. Curtis, A., and De Lacy, T., 1996. Landcare in Australia:does it make a difference. Journal of Environmental Management., 46:119–137.
12. Curtis, A., and Lockwood, M., 1998. “ Natural resource policy for rural Australia:a social perspective. In:”. In Agriculture and the environmental imperative. Edited by:Pratley, J., and Robertson, A. I., Melbourne:CSIRO Publishing.
13. Curtis, A., and Van Nouhuys, M., 1999a. Landcare participation in Australia:the volunteer perspective. Sustainable Development., 7 (2):98–111.
14. Curtis, A., and Van Nouhuys, M., 1999b. Landcare in Victoria:beyond onground work. Johnstone Centre, Charles Sturt University, Albury.
15. Curtis, A., and Van Nouhuys, M., 1999c. Landcare support in South West Victoria. The Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Horsham.
16. Curtis, A., Birckhead, J., and De Lacy, T., 1995. Community participation in Landcare policy in Australia:The Victorian experience with regional landcare plans. Society and Natural Resources., 8:415–430.
17. Hunt, P., 1999. “ Landcare crisis. ”. In The Weekly Times March 10, 1999.
18. Millar, J., and Curtis, A., 1997. Moving farmer knowledge beyond the farm gate:An Australian study of farmer knowledge in group learning. European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension., 4 (2):133–142.
19. Mues, C., Chapman, L., and Van Hilst, R., 1998. “ Landcare:”. In Promoting improved land management practices on Australian farms:A survey of landcare and land management related programs. Canberra:Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
20. Pearce, J. L., 1993. Volunteers:The organizational behavior of unpaid workers. New York:Routledge.
21. Selin, S. W., and Myers, N., 1995. Correlates of Partnership Effectiveness:The Coalition for Unified Recreation in the Eastern Sierra. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration., 13 (4):37–46.
22. Waddock, S., and Bannister, B., 1991. Correlates of effectiveness and partner satisfaction in social partnerships. Journal of Organizational Change Management., 19 (2):74–89.