Long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty with different trephine systems - A clinical investigation from the University Eye Hospital of Halle/Saale and the Eye Clinic of the Helios Hospital Aue;Langzeitergebnisse der perforierenden keratoplastik mit verschiedenen trepansystemen - Eine klinische studie aus der Universitätsaugenklinik Halle/Saale und der Augenklinik des Helios Klinikums Aue

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 221, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1012-1019

  Jahne U G ^c   Duncker, G I W ^a   Jahne M G ^b  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b Augenklinik des Helios Klinikums Aue   (Germany)

^c HELIOS KLINIKUM ERFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Astigmatism; Keratoplasty; Trephine systems

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORGAN DONOR; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREPHINE; VISUAL ACUITY; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

EID: 11244346096     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813710     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alldregde OC, Krachmer JH. Clinical types of corneal transplant rejection. Their manifestations, frequency, preoperative correlates and treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 1981; 99: 599-604
2. Arentsen JJ. Corneal transplant allograft reaction: possible predisposing factors. Trans Am Ophthalmol 1983; 81: 361-402
3. Baun O, Gregersen E, Prause JU. Irreversible immune reactions following keratoplasty. Retrospective clinical and histological evaluation of graft failure in a material of 206 consecutive eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 1987; 65: 641-647
4. Busin M, Monks T, Al-Nawaiseh I. Different suturing techniques variously affect the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1200-1205
5. Duncker GIW. Keratoplastik und Hornhautbank. Ophthalmologe 1995; 92: 366-376
6. Engelmann K, Fell A, Fankhauser F. Indikationsstellung zur Keratoplastik bei Keratokonus. Z prakt Augenheilkd 2002; 23: 87-91
7. Ficker LA, Kirkness CM, Rice NS et al. Longterm prognosis for corneal grafting in herpes simplex keratitis. Eye 1988; 2: 400-408
8. Filatov V, Steinert RF, Talamo JH. Postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or interrupted sutures. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 115: 715-721
9. Gibbs DC, Batchelor JR, Werb A et al. The influence of tissue-type compatibility on the fate of full-thickness corneal grafts. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1974; 94: 101-126
10. Gross RH, Poulsen EJ, Davitt S et al. Comparison of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty by experienced cornea surgeons and cornea fellows. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 123: 636-643
11. Hoffmann F, Keyserlingk HJ von, Wiederholt M. Bedeutung der Transplantationsantigene für die Keratoplastik. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1988; 85: 186-189
12. Jähne MG. Perforierende Keratoplastik beim Keratokonus. Augenspiegel 2002; 48 (3): 8-14
13. Jonas JB, Rank RM, Budde WM. Visual outcome after allogenic penetrating keratoplasty. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002; 240: 302-307
14. Jonas JB, Rank RM, Budde WM. Immunologic graft reactions after allogenic penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133: 437-443
15. Krumeich JH, Grasl M, Binder PS et al. Geführtes Trepansystem für perforierende Keratoplastiken. In: Freyler H, Skorpik C, Grasl M (Hrsg). 3. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen-Implantation. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1989: 450-456
16. Küchle M, Cursiefen C, Nguyen NX et al. Risk factors for corneal allograft rejection: intermediate results of a prospective normal-risk keratoplasty study. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002; 240: 580-584
17. Legeais JM, Parel JM, Simon G et al. Endothelial damage by the corneal Hessburg-Barron vacuum trephine. Refract Corn Surg 1993; 9: 255-258
18. Naumann GOH, Sautter H. Chirurgie der Cornea. In: Mackensen G, Neubauer H (Hrsg). Augenärztliche Operationen. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1988: Band 1: 491-555
19. Naumann GOH, Seitz B, Lang GK et al. Excimer-Laser-193 nm Trepanation bei der perforierenden Keratoplastik - Bericht über die ersten 70 Patienten. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993; 203: 252-261
20. Paufique L, Sourdille GP, Offret G. Les greffes de la cornée. Paris: Masson et Cie. Editeurs, 1948: 131-136
21. Pleyer U, Weidle EG, Lisch W et al. Klinische Verlaufsformen immunologischer Transplantatreaktion nach perforierender Keratoplastik. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1990; 87: 14-19
22. Price FW, Whitson WE, Collins KS et al. Five year corneal graft survival. A large single-center patient cohort. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 799-805
23. Price FW, Whitson WE, Collins KS et al. Risk factors for corneal graft failure. J Refract Surg 1996; 12: 134-143
24. Radner W, Skorpik C, Loewe R et al. Effect of trephination technique on the ultrastructure of corneal transplants: guided trephine system upsilon posterior punch technique. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83: 1172-1177
25. Reinhard T, Sundmacher R. Überwindung des Engpasses. Dtsch Ärztebl 2000; 97: 1452-1455
26. Reinhard T, Böhringer D, Hüschen D et al. Chronischer Endothelzellverlust des Transplantats nach perforierender Keratoplastik: Einfluß der Migration von Endothelzellen vom Transplantat zur Wirtshornhaut. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2002; 219: 410-416
27. Reinhard T, Hutmacher M, Sundmacher R. Acute and chronic immune reactions after penetrating keratoplasty with normal immune risk. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1997; 210: 139-143
28. Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Küchle M et al. Astigmatismus bei Keratoplastik: Prophylaxe und Therapie. Z Prakt Augenheilkd 2001; 22: 107-110
29. Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Küchle M et al. Unterschiede der funktionellen Ergebnisse nach perforierender Keratoplastik wegen Keratokonus und Fuchsscher Dystrophie. Ophthalmologe 2001; Suppl 1: 164
30. Severin M. Immune reactions after penetrating keratoplasty. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1986; 188: 200-208
31. Sharif KW, Casey TA. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: complications and long-term success. Br J Ophthalmol 1991; 75: 142-146
32. Spadea L, Cifariello F, Bianco G et al. Long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty using a single or double running suture technique. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002; 240: 415-419
33. Sundmacher R, Reinhard T. Bedarfsdeckung mit qualitätsgesicherten Hornhauttransplantaten - die Rolle der Hornhautbanken und der Kostenträger in Deutschland. Ophthalmologe 2001; 98: 273-276
34. Sundmacher R. The role of donor epithelium in perforating keratoplasty. Dev Ophthalmol 1985; 11: 61-67
35. Tagawa Y, Silverstein AM, Prendergast RA. Mechanisms of allograft rejection of corneal endothelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1982; 23: 32-40
36. Thiel HJ, Manthey KF. Incidence of immune-reactions following penetrating keratoplasty (Report on 100 consecutive interventions). Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1980; 177: 274-283
37. Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA et al. Clinical and surgical factors influencing corneal graft survival, visual acuity and astigmatism. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 41-49
38. Watson PG, Richardson E. Large corneal transplants in corneal destructive disease. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1994; 205: 280-283
39. Williams KA, Roder D, Esterman A et al. Factors predictive of corneal graft survival. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 403-414