Multi-knockout genetic network analysis: The Rad6 example

Proceedings - 2004 IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference, CSB 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 332-340

  Kaufman, Alon ^a   Kupiec, Martin ^b   Ruppin, Eytan ^b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; ENZYMES; GENES; MICROBIOLOGY; MUTAGENESIS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; YEAST;

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; DNA POLYMERASE; MULTI-PERTURBATION SHAPLEY VALUE ANALYSIS (MSA); S. CEREVISIAE;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

EID: 11244290945     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/csb.2004.1332446     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. A. Barabasi and Z. Oltvai. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(2): 101-113, 2004.
2. S. Ben-Aroya, A. Koren, B. Liefshitz, R. Steinlauf, and M. Kupiec. ELG1, a yeast gene required for genome stability, forms a complex related to replication factor c. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100(17):9906-11, 2003.
3. M. Brendel and R. Haynes. Interactions among genes controlling sensitivity to radiation and alkylation in yeast. Mol. Gen. Genet., 125:197-216, 1973.
4. T. Broomfield, S. Hryciw and W. Xiao. DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutation Research, 486(3):167-184, 2001.
5. A. Carpenter and D. Sabatini. Systematic genome-wide screens of gene function. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5:11-22, 2004.
6. J. H. Friedman and W. Stuetzle. Projection pursuit regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 76(376):817-823, 1981.
7. G. Giaever. et al., Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418, 418:387-391, 2002.
8. M. Grabisch and M. Roubens. An axiomatic approach to the concept of interaction among players in cooperative games. International Journal of Game Theory, 28:547-565, 1999.
9. Z. Gu, L. Steinmetz, X. Gu, C. Scharfe, R. Davis, and W. Li. Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations. Nature, 421(6918):63-6, 2003.
10. T. Ideker, V. Thorsson, and R. Karp. Discovery of regulatory interactions through perturbation: inference and experimental design. In Proc. of the Pacic Symp. on Bio-computing, pages 305-16, 2000.
11. A. Keinan, A. Kaufman, N. Sachs, C. C. Hilgetag, and E. Ruppin. Fair localization of function via multi-lesion analysis. Special issue of the journal of Neuroinformatics, to appear, 2004. http://www.cns.tau.ac.il/new/msa.html.
12. A. Keinan, B. Sandbank, C. C. Hilgetag, I. Meilijson, and E. Ruppin. Fair attribution of functional contribution in artificial and biological networks. Neural Computation, 16(9), 2004.
13. J. Kim and S. MacNeill. Genome stability: a new member of the RFC family. Current Biology, 13(22):R873-R875, 2003.
14. J. Pearl. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, 2000.
15. D. Pe'er, A. Regev, G. Elidan, and N. Friedman. Inferring subnetworks from perturbed expression profiles. Bioinformatics, 17(S215-S224), 2001.
16. L. S. Shapley. A value for n-person games. In H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, editors, Contributions to the Theory of Games, volume II of Annals of Mathematics Studies 28, pages 307-317. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1953.
17. L. Steinmetz and R. Davis. Maximizing the potential of functional genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(3):190-201, 2004.
18. A. Tong. et al., Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science, 303(5659):808-813, 2004.
19. E. Winzeler. et al., Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science, 285:901-906, 1999.