Visual illusion in virtual world alters women's target-directed walking

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 159, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 360-369

  Chaudhury, Sidhartha ^a   Eisinger, Jane M ^a   Hao, Lei ^a   Hicks, John ^a   Chivukula, Raghu ^a   Turano, Kathleen A ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Far space; Gender; Illusion; Induced Roelofs effect; Locomotion; Near space; Perception and action

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENT; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBALIZATION; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; WALKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SEX FACTORS; SPACE PERCEPTION; WALKING;

EID: 11144323298     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1961-7     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Berthoz A, Viaud-Delmon I (1999) Multisensory integration in spatial orientation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:708-712
2. Berti A, Smania N, Rabuffetti M, Ferrarin M, D'Amico A, Allport A (2002) Coding of far and near space during walking in neglect patients. Neuropsychology 16:390-399
3. Bridgeman B, Stark L (1991) Ocular proprioception and efference copy in registering visual direction. Vision Res 31:1903-1914
4. Bridgeman B, Kirch M, Sperling A (1981) Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Percept Psychophys 29:336-342
5. Bridgeman B, Perry S, Anand S (1997) Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Percept Psychophys 59:456-469
6. Bridgeman B, Gemmer A, Forsman T, Huemer V (2000) Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Res 40:3539-3552
7. Carrozzo M, Stratte F, McIntyre J, Lacquaniti F (2002) Cognitive allocentric representations of visual space shaping pointing errors. Exp Brain Res 147:426-436
8. Coello Y, Richaud S, Magne P, Rosetti Y (2003) Vision for spatial perception and vision for action: a dissociation between the left-right and near-far dimension. Neuropsychologia 41:622-633
9. Colby CL, Duhamel JR, Goldberg ME (1993) Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: anatomic location and visual response properties. J Neurophysiol 69:902-914
10. Colby CL, Duhamel JR, Goldberg ME (1996) Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraprietal area. J Neurophysiol 76:2841-2852
11. Collaer M L, Nelson JD (2002) Large visuospatial sex difference in line judgement: possible role of attentional factors. Brain Cogn 49:1-12
12. Cowey A, Small M, Ellis S (1994) Left viso-spatial neglect can be worse in far space than in near space. Neuropsychologia 32:1059-1066
13. Dabbs JM Jr, Chang EL, Strong RA, Milun R (1998) Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Cogn Brain Res 6:351-360
14. Dassonville P, Bridgeman B, Bala JK, Thiem P, Sampanes A (2004) The induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame. Vision Res 44:603-611
15. de Grave DDJ, Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (2002) Are the original Roelofs effect and the induced Roelofs effect caused by the same shift in straight ahead? Vision Res 42:2279-2285
16. Duhamel JR, Bremmer F, BenHamed S, Graf W (1997) Spatial invariance of visual receptive field in parietal cortex neurons. Nature 389:845-848
17. Epstein R, Kanwisher N (1998) A cortical representation of the local environment. Nature 392:598-601
18. Fogassi L, Gallese V, Fadiga L, Luppino G, Matelli M, Rizzolatti G (1996) Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex area (F4). J Neurophysiol 76:141-157
19. Gentillucci M, Fogassi L, Luppino G, Matelli M, Camarda R, Rizzolatti G (1988) Functional organization of inferior area 6 in macaque monkey. I. Somatotopy and the control of proximal movements. Exp Brain Res 71:475-490
20. Gentillucci M, Chieffi S, Daprati E, Saetti MC, Toni I (1995) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34:369-376
21. Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992) Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 15:20-25
22. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jackobson LS, Carey DP (1991) A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349:154-156
23. Graziano MSA, Yap GS, Cross CG (1994) Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science 266:1054-1057
24. Gron G, Wunderlich AP, Spitzer M, Tomczak R, Riepe MW (2000) Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience 3:404-408
25. Haffenden P, Goodale MA (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cogn Neurosci 10:122-136
26. Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1991) Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 350:498-500
27. Heilman KM, Bowers D, Shelton P (1990) Attention to near and far space: the third dichotomy. Behav Brain Sci 13:552-553
28. Ismail AR, Asfour SS (1999) Discrete wavelet transform: a tool in smoothing kinematic data. J Biomechanics 32:317-321
29. Latto R, Cowey A (1971) Visual field defects after frontal eye-field lesions in monkeys. Brain Res 30:1-24
30. Leinonen L, Hyvarinen G, Nyman G, Linnankoski I (1979) Functional properities of neurons in lateral part of associative area 7 in awake monkeys. Exp Brain Res 34:299
31. Linn MC, Petersen AC (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56:1479-1498
32. Milner AD, Perrett DI, Johnston RS, Benson PJ, Jordan TJ, Heeley DW, Bertucci D, Mortara F, Mutani R, Terazzi E (1991) Perception and action in visual form agnosia. Brain 114:405-428
33. Pitzalis S, Di Russo F, Spinelli D, Zoccolotti P (2001) Influence of radial and vertical dimensions on lateral neglect. Exp Brain Res 136:281-294
34. Postma A, Izendoorn R, de Haan EHF (1998) Sex differences in object location memory. Brain Cogn 36:334-345
35. Previc FH (1990) Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav Brain Sci 13:519-575
36. Rushton SK, Harris JM, Lloyd MR (1998) Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow. Curr Biol 8:1191-1194
37. Sandstrom NJ, Kaufman J, Huettel SA (1998) Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cogn Brain Res 6:351-360
38. Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden MP (1995) Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol Bull 117:250-270
39. Vuilleumier P, Valenza N, Mayer E, Reverdin A, Landis T (1998) Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 43:406-410
40. Weiss PH, Marshall JC, Wunderlich G, Tellmann L, Halligan PW, Freund HJ, Zilles K, Fink GR (2000) Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis of clinical dissociations. Brain 123: 2531-2541
41. Werner H, Wapner S, Bruell JH (1953) Experiments on sensorytonic field theory of perception. VI. Effect of position of head, eyes, and of object on position of the apparent median plane. JExp Psychol 46:293-299
42. Zipser D, Andersen RA (1988) A back propagation programmed netowrk that stimulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature 331:679-684