Constructing rotating item pools for constrained adaptive testing

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 345-359

  Ariel, Adelaide ^a   Veldkamp, Bernard P ^a   Van Der Linden, Wim J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144313757     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01170.x     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.
2. Hambleton; R. K., Swaminathan H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Luecht, R. M. (1998). Computer-assisted test assembly using optimization heuristics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 224-236.
4. McBride, J. R., Wetzel, C. D., & Hetter, R. D. (1997). Preliminary psychometric research for CAT-ASVAB: Selecting an adaptive testing strategy. In W. A. Sands, B. K. Waters, & J. R. McBride (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation (pp. 83-95). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Paragon Decision Technology BV. (2003). AIMMS [Computer software and manual]. Haarlem, The Netherlands: Author.
6. Stocking, M. L. (1994). Three practical issues for modern adaptive testing item pools. ETS Research Report No. 93-2. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
7. Stocking, M. L., & Swanson, L. (1998). Optimal design of item banks for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 271-279.
8. Swanson, L., & Stocking, M. L. (1993). A model and heuristic for solving very large item selection problems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 151-166.
9. Sympson, J. B., & Hetter, R. D. (1985). Controlling item exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Military Testing Association (pp. 973-977). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
10. van der Linden, W. J. (2000). Constrained adaptive testing with shadow tests. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 27-52). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. van der Linden, W. J. (2003). Some alternatives to Sympson-Hetter item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 249-265.
12. van der Linden, W. J., & Boekkooi-Timminga, E. (1988). A zero one programming approach to Gulliksen's matched random subtests method. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 201-209.
13. van der Linden, W., & Pashley, P. J. (2000). Item selection and ability estimation. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 1-25). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. van der Linden, W. J., Veldkamp, B. P., & Carlson, J. E. (2004). Optimizing balanced incomplete block designs for educational assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 317-331.
15. van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Aarts, E. H. L. (1987). Simulated annealing: Theory and applications. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
16. Veerkamp, W. J. J., & Berger, M. P. F. (1999). Optimal item discrimination and maximum information for logistic IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 31-40.
17. Veldkamp, B. P. (1999). Multiple objective test assembly problems. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 253-266.
18. Veldkamp, B. P. (2001). Principles and methods of constrained test assembly. Thesis, Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.
19. Veldkamp,B. P., & van der Linden, W. J. (2000). Designing item pools for computerized adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice (pp. 149-162). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Way, W. D. (1998). Protecting the integrity of computerized testing item pools. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice, 17, 17-27.
21. Way, W. D., Steffen, M., & Anderson, G. S. (1998). Developing, maintaining, and renewing the item inventory to support computer-based testing. Paper presented at the colloquium on Computer-Based Testing: Building the Foundation for Future Assessments, Philadelphia, PA.