Organizing technologies: Genre forms of online civic association in Eastern Europe

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 597, Issue , 2005, Pages 171-188

  Vedres, Balázs ^a   Bruszt, László ^b   Stark, David ^c  

^a CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Civil society; Eastern Europe; Internet; Participation; Technology; Web site analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144305084     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716204270504     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Agresti, Alan. 2002. Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley.
2. Barabási, Albert-László, Réka Albert, and Hawoong Jeong. 2000. Scale-free characteristics of random networks: The topology of the World Wide Web. Physica A 281:69-77.
3. Barley, Stephen. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31:78-108.
4. Boczkowski, Pablo J. 2004. Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Callon, Michel. 1991. Techno-economic networks and irreversibility, In A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination, ed. J. Law, 132-61. London: Routledge.
6. DiMaggio, Paul, Eszter Hargittai, W. Russell Neumann, and John, P. Robinson. 2001. Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology 27:307-36.
7. Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1993. The printing revolution in early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Fischer, Claude S. 1992. America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Hand, Martin, and Barry Sandywell. 2002. E-topia as cosmopolis and citadel: On the democratizing and de-democratizing logics of the Internet, or, Toward a critique of the new technological fetishism. Theory, Culture, and Society 19 (1-2): 197-225.
10. Hindman, Matthew, Kostas Tsioutsiouliklis, and Judy A. Johnson. 2003. Googlearchy: How a few heavily-linked sites dominate politics on the Web. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
11. Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Kuti, Eva. 2001. A nonprofit szektor fõbb statísztikai jellemzõi. Budapest, Hungary: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal.
13. Latour, Bruno. 1991. Technology is society made durable. In A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, ed. J. Law, 103-31. London: Routledge.
14. _. 1999. On recalling ANT. In Actor network theory and after, ed. John Law and John Hassard. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, the Sociological Review.
15. Orlikowski, Wanda J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11 (4): 404-28.
16. Robinson, John P., Paul DiMaggio, and Eszter Hargittai. 2003. New social survey perspectives on the digital divide. IT&Society 1 (5): 1-22.
17. Ward, Joe H., Jr. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58:236-44.
18. Yates, JoAnne. 1989. Control through communication: The rise of the system of American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.