Symposium on consent and confidentiality. J Med Ethics 2003;29:2-40 [3]

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 609-

  Schildmann, Jan ^a   Cushing, A ^b   Doyal, L ^b   Vollmann, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTINUING EDUCATION; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LETTER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; RESPONSIBILITY; SYMPOSIUM; UNITED KINGDOM;

PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ADULT; CONFIDENTIALITY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; PATIENT RIGHTS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;

EID: 11144291048     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.004192     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Symposium on consent and confidentiality. J Med in Ethics 2003;29:2-40.
2. O'Neill O. Some limits of informed consent. J Med Ethics 2003;29:4-7.
3. Bravo G, Paquet M, Dubois MF. Knowledge of the legislation governing proxy consent to treatment and research. J Med Ethics 2003;29:44-50.
4. Doyal L. Closing the gap between professional teaching and practice. BMJ 2001;322:685-6.
5. Department of Health. Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment, Available at: www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/01/90/79/04019079.pdf (accessed 27 July 2004).
6. General Medical Council. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. London: General Medical Council, 1998.