Evaluation of the independent review of a major life decision affecting people who have an intellectual disability

Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 202-213

  Bigby, Christine ^a   Tait, Sue ^b  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Intellectual Disability Review ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; LAW; LAW SUIT; REVIEW;

EID: 11144271234     PISSN: 13218719     EISSN: 19341687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/pplt.2004.11.2.202     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Auditor-General Victoria. (2000). Services for People with an Intellectual Disability Melbourne, Australia: Auditor-General Victoria.
2. Bray, A., Dawson, J., ‖ van Winden, J. (2000). Who benefits from welfare guardianship? Dunedin, New Zealand: Donald Beasley Institute.
3. Carney, T., ‖ Akers, K., (1990). The Victorian Disability Review Panel: Legitimacy in Reviewing Welfare Entitlements’. Melbourne, Australia: Unpublished report, Monash University.
4. Carney, T., ‖ Akers, K. (1991). A coffee table chat or a formal hearing? The relative merits of conciliation conferences and full adjudicative hearings at the Victorian Intellectual Disability Review Panel. Australian Dispute Resolution Journal, August.
5. Carney, T., ‖ Tait, D. (1993) Balanced Accountability: An Evaluation of the Victorian Guardianship and Administration Board. Melbourne, Australia. Office of the Public Advocate
6. Carney, T. (2001, April). Re-mixing ’Access’, Advocacy, Empowerment’ and ’Protection. Paper presented to Intellectual Disability Review Panel Forum on Legislative Review, Melbourne, Australia.
7. Cox, C., ‖ Pearson, M. (1995). Made to care: The case for residential and village communities for people with a mental handicap. London: The Rannoch Trust.
8. Cummins, R., ‖ Lau, A. (2003). Community integration or community exposure? A review and discussion in relation to people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disability 16, 145–157.
9. Department of Health and Community Services. (1995). Report to the Hon. Michael John, MP. Minister for Community Services from the Intellectual Disability Services Task Force. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
10. Department of Human Services. (2002). Annual report. Melbourne, Australia: Author
11. Department of Human Services, Disability Services. (2002). Victorian State Disability Plan. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
12. Emerson, E., ‖ Hatton, C. (1996). Deinstitutionalisation in the UK and Ireland: Outcomes for service users. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 21(1), 17–37.
13. Intellectual Disability Review Panel. (2003). Annual report. Melbourne, Australia: Author
14. Intellectual Disability Review Panel. (2003). Submission to the Victorian Government Review of Disability Legislation. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
15. Jackson, R. (1996). Bound to care: An anthology. Stockport, UK: RESCARE.
16. Johnson, K., ‖ Tait, S. (2003). Throwing away the key: People with intellectual disability and involuntary detention. In K. Diesfeld ‖ I. Freckelton (Eds.), Involuntary detention and therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 505–528). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
17. Kim, S., Larson, S., ‖ Lakin, K. (2001). Behavioral outcomes of deinstitutionalization for people with intellectual disabilities: A review of studies conducted between 1980 and 1999. Journal of Intellectual ‖ Developmental Disabilities, 26, 35–50.
18. Mental Health Review Board. (2003). Annual report. Melbourne, Australia: Author
19. Nicholson, The Hon. Justice R.D. (1995) Waving the magic wand: Solving key legal issues relating to intellectual disability. Journal of Law and Medicine, 2 May, 270–292
20. Rimmer, J. (1984). Report of the committee on a legislative framework for services to intellectually disabled persons. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Government Printing Office.
21. Rothman, J. (1994) Practice with highly vulnerable clients: Case management and community-based service. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
22. Sanderson, H. (2000) Person centred planning: Key features and approaches. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
23. Sanderson, H. (2002). A plan is not enough: exploring the development of person centred teams. In S. Holburn and P. Vietze (Eds.), Person Centred Planning, Research, Practice and Future Directions. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
24. The Age (2003). Letters to the editor, June. Melbourne, Australia: David Syme.
25. Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (2001). Annual report. Melbourne. Author
26. Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2002). People with intellectual disabilities at risk – A legal framework for compulsory care. Melbourne, Australia: Author.
27. Winick, B.J. (2003). A therapeutic jurisprudence model for civil commitment. In K. Diesfeld ‖ I. Freckelton (Eds.), Involuntary detention and therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 25–28). Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
28. Young, I., Sigafoos, J., Suttie, J., Ashman, A., ‖ Grevell, P. (1998). Deinstitutionalisation of person with intellectual disabilities: A review of Australian studies. Journal of Intellectual ‖ Developmental Disabilities, 23, 155–170.