Dynamic graciloplasty versus implant of artificial sphincter for continent perineal colostomy after Miles' procedure: Technique and early results

Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies

Volumn 13, Issue 5-6, 2004, Pages 347-361

  Lirici, M M ^a   Ishida, Y ^a   Di Paola, M ^a   Ponzano, C ^a   Huscher C G S ^a  

^a MOLINETTE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Artificial sphincter; Continent perineal colostomy; Dynamic graciloplasty; Laparoscopic dynamic graciloplasty; Laparoscopic implant of artificial sphincter; Laparoscopic Miles' procedures; Laparoscopic total anorectal reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANUS SPHINCTER DISORDER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON DISEASE; COLOSTOMY; CONTINENT ILEOSTOMY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEATH; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE LOOP; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; MORBIDITY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RECTUM ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION; SKIN ULCER; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND CLOSURE;

EID: 11144260214     PISSN: 13645706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645700410006616     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Araujo SE, da Silva eSousa AH Jr, de Campos FG, Habr-Gama A, et al. Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2003;58:133-40.
2. Rouanet P, Senesse P, Bouamrirene D, Toureille E, et al. Anal sphincter reconstruction by dynamic graciloplasty after abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 51-6.
3. Wong WD, Jensen LL, Bartolo DCC, Rothenberger DA. Artificial anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39: 1345-51.
4. Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, Metzger JL. Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by transplanting the gracilis muscle: a report of four cases in children. Ann Surg 1952;139: 853-62.
5. Cavina E, Seccia M, Evangelista G. Construction of a continent perineal colostomy by using electrostimulated gracilis muscles after abominoperineal resection: personal technique and experience with 32 cases. Ital J Surg Sci 1987;17:305-14.
6. Adang EM, Engel GL, Rutten FF, Geerdes BP, et al. Cost-effectiveness of dynamic graciloplasty in patients for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 725-33.
7. Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P, Young J, et al. Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 138-53.
8. Wexner SD, Baeten C, Bailey R, Bakka A, et al. Long-term efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:809-18.
9. Hajivassiliou CA, Finlay IG. Effect of a novel prosthetic anal neosphincter on human colonic blood flow. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1703-7.
10. Hajivassiliou CA, Carter KB, Finley IG. Assessment of a new implantable artificial anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 11-7.
11. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Gold DM, Bartram CI, et al. Clinical, physiological, and radiological study of a new purpose-designed artificial bowel sphincter. Lancet 1998;352:105-9.
12. Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti P, Zocco G. Anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection. Experience with double-wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1010-5.
13. Cavina & Seccia M, Chiarugi M, Banti P, et al. Laparoscopically assisted abdominoperineal resection and simultaneous total anorectal reconstruction with electrostimulated static-dynamic graciloplasty. Surg Endosc 1997;11:1209-12.
14. Rongen MJ, Adang EM, van der Hoop AG, Baeten CG. One-step vs two-step procedure in dynamic graciloplasty. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3:51-7.
15. Ortiz H, Armendariz P, DeMiguel M, Solana A, et al. Prospective study of artificial sphincter and dynamic graciloplasty for severe anal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003;18: 49-54.
16. Korolija D, Tadic S, Simic D. Extent of oncological resection in laparoscopic vs. open colorectal surgery: meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2003; 387: 366-71.
17. Baeten CGMI and the Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Report of a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:743-51.
18. Lehur PA, Glemain P, Bruley des Varannes S, Buzelin JM, et al. Outcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinence. Int J Colorect Dis 1998;13: 8-92.
19. Rongen MJ, Uludag O, El Naggar K, Geerdes BP, et al. Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46: 716-21.
20. Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, Caundry M, et al. Morbidity and functional outcome after double dynamic graciloplasty for anorectal reconstruction. Br J Surg 2000;87:909-13.
21. Salmons S, Henriksson J. The adaptive response of skeletal muscle to increased use. Muscle Nerve 1981;4: 94-105.
22. Matzel KE, Madoff RD, LaFontaine LJ, Baeten CGMI, et al. the Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group. Complications of dynamic graciloplasty. Incidence, management and impact on outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1427-35.
23. Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G, Feil W, et al. Restoration of anal sphincter function by single-stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg 1998; 175:187-93.
24. Shatari T, Fujita M, Nozawa K, Haku K, et al. Feasibility of dividing the main vessels for enhancement of dynamic graciloplasty. Surg Today 2002;32: 974-80.