Feasibility of dividing the main vessels for enhancement of dynamic graciloplasty

Surgery Today

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 974-980

  Shatari, Tomoo ^a,b   Fujita, Masanobu ^a   Nozawa, Keijiroh ^a   Haku, Kyokun ^a   Niimi, Masanori ^a   Ikeda, Yoshifumi ^a   Kan, Shigenao ^a   Kodaira, Susumu ^a  

^a TEIKYO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dynamic graciloplasty; Electrical stimulation; Fecal incontinence; Gracilis muscle; Neoanal sphincter; Vascular delay

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANUS; ARTERY LIGATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; GRACILOPLASTY; ISCHEMIA; JAPAN; MALE; MUSCLE FLAP; NONHUMAN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RABBIT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR SURGERY; VEIN LIGATION;

ADULT; AGED; ANAL CANAL; ANIMALS; ANUS DISEASES; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGATION; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; RABBITS; SURGICAL FLAPS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036449446     PISSN: 09411291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s005950200195     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991;338:1166-9.
2. Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM, Heineman E, Konsten J, Engel GL, et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1600-5.
3. Madoff RD, Rosen HR, Baeten CG, LaFontaine LJ, Cavina E, Devesa M, et al. Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: Lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial. Gastroenterology 1999;116:549-56.
4. Mander BJ, Wexner SD, Williams NS, Bartolo DC, Lubowski DZ, Oresland T, et al. Preliminary results of a multicentre trial of the electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter. Br J Surg 1999;86:1543-8.
5. Korsgen S, Keighley MR. Stimulated gracilis neosphincter - Not as good as previously thought. Report of four cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1331-3.
6. Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Konsten J, Soeters PB, Baeten CG. Dynamic graciloplasty. Complications and management. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:912-7.
7. Wexner SD, Gonzalez-Padron A, Teoh TA, Moon HK. The stimulated gracilis neosphincter for fecal incontinence: A new use for an old concept. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:693-9.
8. Mander BJ, Abercrombie JF, George BD, Williams NS. The electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter incorporated as part of total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Ann Surg 1996;224:702-9.
9. Traxler H, Windisch A, Surd R, Rosen H, Schiessel R, Firbas W. Arterial supply of the gracilis muscle and its relevance for the dynamic graciloplasty. Clin Anat 1999;12:159-63.
10. Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: Experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;67:177-87.
11. Juricic M, Vaysse P, Guitard J, Moscovici J, Becue J, Juskiewenski S. Anatomic basis for use of a gracilis muscle flap. Surg Radiol Anat 1993;15:163-8.
12. Shatari T, Niimi M, Fujita M, Kodaira S. Vascular anatomy of gracilis muscle: Arterial findings to enhance graciloplasty. Surg Radiol Anat 2000;22:21-4.
13. Carroll SM, Heilman SJ, Stremel RW, Tobin GR, Barker JH. Vascular delay improves latissimus dorsi muscle perfusion and muscle function for use in cardiomyoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:1329-37.
14. Morris SF, Yang D. Effect of vascular delay on viability, vasculature, and perfusion of muscle flaps in the rabbit. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1041-9.
15. Adair TH, Hang J, Wells ML, Magee FD, Montani JP. Long-term electrical stimulation of rabbit skeletal muscle increases growth of paired arteries and veins. Am J Physiol 1995;269:H717-24.
16. Rosen HR, Feil W, Novi G, Zoch G, Dahlberg S, Schiessel R. The electrically stimulated (dynamic) graciloplasty for faecal incontinence - First experiences with a modified muscle sling. Int J Colorectal Dis 1994;9:184-6.
17. Hudlicka O, Brown M, Cotter M, Smith M, Vrbova G. The effect of long-term stimulation of fast muscles on their blood flow, metabolism and ability to withstand fatigue. Pflügers Arch 1977; 369:141-9.
18. Geerdes BP, Heineman E, Freling G, Keizer HA, Woloszko J, Baeten CG. Vascular and stimulation delays in dynamic musculoplasty. Surgery 1997;121:402-10.
19. Shatari T, Kawahara H, Inoue S, Sakurai T, Kawachi S, Teramoto T, et al. A new approach to dynamic graciloplasty. J Gastroenterol 1998;33:117-20.