Reasoning maps: A generally applicable method for characterizing hypothesis-testing behaviour

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 26, Issue 14, 2004, Pages 1715-1731

  White, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144259433     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950069042000243718     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bransford, J., Brown, A. et al. (eds.) (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
2. Campbell, N. and Reece, J. (2002). Biology (San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings).
3. Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1993). The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
4. Ericsson, K. and Simon, H. (1984). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
5. Hempel, C. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
6. Hug, B. and Krajcik, J. (2002). Students' Scientific Practices Using a Scaffolded Inquiry Sequence (New Orleans, LA: National Association for Research in Science Teaching).
7. Kelly, G., Drucker, S., et al. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849-871.
8. Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
9. Klayman, J. and Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94(2), 211-228.
10. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
11. Kuhn, D. and Phelps, E. (1982). The development of problem-solving strategies. Advances in Child Development, 17, 1-44.
12. Kuhn, D., Black, J., et al. (2000). The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 495-503.
13. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory Life: The Construcion of Scientific Facts (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
14. Lawson, A. (2002). Sound and faulty arguments generated by preservice biology teachers when testing hypotheses involving unobservable entities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 237-252.
15. Moshman, D. (1979). Development of formal hypothesis-testing ability. Developmental Psychology, 15(2), 104-112.
16. Mynatt, C., Doherty, M., et al. (1978). Consequences of confirmation and disconfirmation in a simulated research environment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 395-406.
17. Newell, A. and Simon, H. (1972). Human Problem Solving (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
18. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
19. Purves, W., Orians, G., et al. (1995). Life: The Science of Biology (Sunderland, MA: Sinauer).
20. Raven, P. and Johnson, G. (2002). Biology (New York: McGraw-Hill).
21. Schauble, L. (1990). Belief revision in children: the role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 31-57.
22. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., et al. (1991). Students' transformation from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859-882.
23. Schauble, L., Glaser, R., et al. (1992). The integration of knowledge and experimentation strategies in understanding a physical system. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 321-343.
24. Shute, V., Glaser, R., et al. (1989). Inference and discovery in an exploratory laboratory. in P. Ackerman, R. Sternberg and R. Glaser (eds). Learning and Individual Differences: Advances in Theory and Research (New York: WH Freeman).
25. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
26. Tschirgi, J. (1980). Sensible reasoning: a hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development, 51, 1-10.
27. White, B.T. (1999). The Red & White Yeast Lab: an introduction to science as a process. American Biology Teacher, 61(8), 600-604.
28. White, B.Y. and Frederiksen, J.R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.