Investigation of the nonlinear hydrologic response to precipitation forcing in physically based land surface modeling

Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 706-716

  Lee, Khil Ha ^a   Anagnostou, Emmanouil N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; LANDFORMS; PRECIPITATION (METEOROLOGY); RAIN; REMOTE SENSING; SOILS; VEGETATION;

COARSE TIME RESOLUTIONS; COMMUNITY LAND MODEL (CLM); LAND SURFACE MODELING; NONLINEAR HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE;

HYDROLOGY;

EID: 11144232698     PISSN: 07038992     EISSN: 17127971     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5589/m04-037     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adler, R.F., Huffman, G.J., Bolvin, D.T., Curtis, S., and Nelkin, E.J. 2000. Tropical rainfall distributions determined using TRMM combined with other satellite and rain gauge information. Journal ofApplied Meteorology, Vol. 39, No. 12, pp. 2007-2023.
2. Anagnostou, E.N., and Krajewski, W.F. 1999. Real-time radar rainfall estimation: 1. Algorithm formulation. Journal ofAtmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 189-197.
3. Anagnostou, E.N., Negri, A.J., and Adler, R.F. 1999a. A satellite infrared technique for diurnal rainfall variability studies. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 104, No. D24, pp. 31477-31488.
4. Anagnostou, E.N., Krajewski, W.F., and Smith, J. 1999b. Uncertainty quantification of mean-field radar-rainfall estimates. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 206-215.
5. Aubert, D., Loumagne, C., and Oudin, L. 2003. Sequential assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow data in a conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 280, Nos. 1-4, pp. 145-161.
6. Ba, M., and Gruber, A. 2001. GOES multispectral rainfall algorithm (GMSRA). Journal ofAppliedMeteorology, Vol. 40, No. 8, pp. 1500-1514.
7. Beven, K.J., and Kirkby, M.J. 1979. A physically based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, Vol. 24, pp. 43-69.
8. Bonan, G.B. 1996. A land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: technical description and user's guide. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, Colo., Technical Note NCAR/TN-417+STR.
9. Bonan, G.B., Olsen, K.W., Vertenstein, M., Levis, S., Zeng, X.B., Dai, Y.J., Dickinson, R.E., and Yang, Z.L. 2002. The land surface climatology of the community land model coupled to the NCAR community climate model. Journal of Climate, Vol. 15, No. 22, pp. 3123-3149.
10. Borga, M., Anagnostou, E.N., and Frank, E. 2000. On the use of real-time radar rainfall estimates for flood prediction in mountainous basins. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 105, No. D2, pp. 2269-2280.
11. Brock, F.V., Crawford, K.C., Elliot, R.L., Cuperns, G.W., Stadler, S.J., Johnson, H.L., and Eilts, M.D. 1995. The Oklahoma Mesonet: a technical overview. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 5-19.
12. Dai, Y.J., and Zeng, Q.C. 1997. A land surface model (IAP94) for climate studies 1: formulation and validation in off-line experiments. Advances in Atmospheric Science, Vol. 14, pp. 433-460.
13. DeFries, R.S., Hansen, M.C., and Townshend, J.R.G. 2000a. Continuous fields of vegetation characteristics: a linear mixture model applied to multi-year 8 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 21, pp. 1389-1414.
14. DeFries, R.S., Hansen, M.C., Townshend, J.R.G., Janetos, A.C., and Loveland, T.R. 2000b. A new global 1-km dataset of percentage tree cover derived from remote sensing. Global Change Biology, Vol. 6, pp. 247-254.
15. Dickson, R.E., Henderson-Sellers, A., Kennedy, P.J., and Wilson, M.F. 1986. Biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) for the NCAR community climate model. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, Colo., Technical Note NCAR/TN-275+STR.
16. Dinku, T., Anagnostou, E.N., and Borga, M. 2002. Improving radar-based estimation of rainfall over complex terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 41, No. 12, pp. 1163-1178.
17. Elliot, R.L., Brock, F.V., Stone, M.L., and Harp, S.L. 1994. Configuration decisions for an automated weather station network. Applied Engineering and Agriculture, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 45-51.
18. Fulton, R.A., Breidenbach, J.P., Seo, D.J., Miller, D.A., and O’Bannon, T. 1998. The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm. Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 377-395.
19. Global Soil Data Task. 2000. Global soil data products (IGBP-DIS) [CDROM]. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, Data and Information System, Potsdam, Germany. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tenn. Available from http://www.daac.ornl.gov.
20. Hossain, F., Anagnostou, E.N., and Dinku, T. 2003. Sensitivity analyses of satellite rainfall retrieval and sampling error on flood prediction uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 130-140.
21. Hsu, K., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, H.V. 1997. Precipitation estimation from remotely sensed information using artificial neural networks. Journal ofApplied Meteorology, Vol. 36, No. 9, pp. 1176-1190.
22. Huffman, G.J., Adler, R.F., Morrissey, M.M., Bolvin, D.T., Curtis, S., Joyce, R., McGavock, B., and Susskind, J. 2001. Global precipitation at one degree daily resolution from multisatellite observations. Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 2, pp. 36-60.
23. Huffman, G.J., Adler, R.F., Stocker, E.F., Bolvin, D.T., and Nelkin, E.J. 2003. Analysis of TRMM 3-hourly multi-satellite precipitation estimates computed in both real and post-real time. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography, 9-13 Feb. 2003, Long Beach, Calif. American Meteorology Society, Boston, Mass.
24. Janowiak, J.E., Joyce, R.J., and Yarosh, Y. 2000. A real-time global halfhourly pixel resolution infrared dataset and its applications. Bulletin of the American Meteorology Society, Vol. 82, pp. 205-217.
25. Koster, R., and Suarez, M. 1996. Energy and water balance calculations in the MOSAIC LSM. NASA Technical Memo 104606, Vol. 9.
26. Liang, X., Wood, E., and Lettenmaier, D. 1996. Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: evaluation and modification. Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 195-206.
27. Loveland, T.R., Reed, B.C., Brown, J.F., Ohlen, D.O., Zhu, Z., Yang, L., and Merchant, J.W. 2000. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 2, pp. 1303-1330.
28. Marshall, C.H., Crawford, K.C., Mitchell, K.E., and Stensrud, D.J. 2003. The impact of the land surface physics in the operational NCEP Eta model on simulating the diurnal cycle: evaluation and testing using Oklahoma Mesonet data. Weather and Forecasting, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 748-768.
29. Mitchell, K., Houser, P., Wood, E., et al. 1999. GCIP land data assimilation system (LDAS) project now underway. GEWEXNews, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 3-6.
30. Mitchell, K., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., et al. 2000. Recent GCIP-sponsored advancements in coupled land-surface modeling and data assimilation in the NCEP Eta mesoscale model. In Proceedings of the 15th AMS Conference on Hydrology, 9-13 Jan. 2000, Long Beach, Calif. American Meteorology Society, Boston, Mass. Paper P1.22.
31. Morrissey, M.L., Maliekal, J.A., Greene, J.S., and Wang, J. 1995. The uncertainty of simple spatial averages using rain-gauge networks. Water Resources Research, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 2011-2017.
32. Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D.P. 2003. Effect of precipitation sampling error on simulated hydrological fluxes and states: anticipating the global precipitation measurement satellites. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 109, No. D2, Art. No. D02103.
33. Pauwels, V.R.N., Hoeben, R., Verhoest, N.E.C., and De Troch, F.P. 2001. The importance of the spatial patterns of remotely sensed soil moisture in the improvement of discharge predictions for small-scale basins through data assimilation. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 251, Nos. 1-2, pp. 88-102.
34. Seo, D.J., Breidenbach, J.P., and Johnson, E.R. 1999. Real-time estimation of mean field bias in radar rainfall data. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 223, Nos. 3-4, pp. 131-147.
35. Seo, D.J., Breidenbach, J., Fulton, R., and Miller, D. 2000. Real-time adjustment of range-dependent biases in WSR-88D rainfall estimates due to nonuniform vertical profile of reflectivity. Journal ofHydrometeorology, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 222-240.
36. Sharif, H.O., Ogden, F.L., Krajewski, W.F., and Xue, M. 2002. Numerical simulations of radar rainfall error propagation. Water Resources Research, Vol. 38, No. 8, Art. No. 1140.
37. Smith, J.A., Seo, D.J., Baeck, M.L., and Hudlow, M.D. 1996. An intercomparison study of NEXRAD precipitation estimates. Water Resources Research, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 2035-2045.
38. Todd, M.C., Kidd, C., Kniveton, D., and Bellerby, T.J. 2000. A combined satellite infrared and passive microwave technique for estimation of small scale rainfall. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 18, pp. 742-754.
39. Ulbrich, C.W., and Lee, L.G. 1999. Rainfall measurement error by WSR-88D radars due to variations in Z-R law parameters and the radar constant. Journal ofAtmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 1017-1024.
40. Vicente, G.A., Scofield, R.A., and Menzel, W.P. 1998. The operational GOES infrared rainfall estimation technique. Bulletin of the American Meteorology Society, Vol. 79, pp. 1883-1898.
41. Wilks, D.S. 1995. Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences: an introduction. Academic Press, New York. 467 pp.