Preservice teachers becoming agents of change: Pedagogical implications for action research

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 57-72

  Price, Jeremy N ^a   Valli, Linda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Action research; Change agency; Teacher education; Teacher education pedagogy; Teacher research

Indexed keywords

EID: 11044228023     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487104272097     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Altrichter, H. (1991). Towards a theory of teaching action research. In C. Colins & P. Chippendale (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Worlds Congress on Action Research and Process Management (Vol. I, pp. 21-32). Sunnybank Hills, Australia: Acorn Publications.
2. Beyer, L. (1996). Creating democratic classrooms: The struggle to integrate theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Bissex, G. L., & Bullock, R. H. (1987). Seeing for ourselves: Case-study research by teachers of writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. Brown, T., & Jones, L. (2001). Action research and postmodernism: Congruence and critique. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
5. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. London: Falmer.
6. Clift, R., Veal, M. L., Johnson, M., & Holland, P. (1990). Restructuring teacher education through collaborative action research. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 52-62.
7. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 51, 279-310.
8. Cochran-Smith, M. (1994). The power of teacher research in teacher education. In S. Hollingsworth & H. Sockett (Eds.), Teacher research and educational reform, 93rd year-book of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 142-165). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Cochran-Smith, M. (1995). Color blindness and basket making are not the answers: Confronting the dilemmas of race, culture, and language diversity in teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 493522.
10. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11.
11. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
12. Gore, J., & Zeichner, K. (1991). Action research and preservice teacher education: A case study from the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 119-136.
13. Goswami, D., & Stillman, P. (1987). Reclaiming the classroom: Teacher research as an agency for change. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton-Cook.
14. Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the teacher: A qualitative introduction to school-based research. New York: Routledge.
15. Hopkins, D. (1985). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
16. Hopkins, D. (1993). A teacher's guide to classroom research (2nd ed.). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
17. Hubbard, R., & Power, B. M. (1999). Living the questions: A guide for teacher-researchers. York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
18. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
19. Noffke, S. E. (1992). The work and workplace of teachers in action research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 15-29.
20. Noffke, S. E. (1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 305-343). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
21. Rearick, M., & Feldman, A. (1999). Orientations, purposes and reflection: A framework for understanding action research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 333-349.
22. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905-947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
23. Ross, D. D. (1987). Action research for preservice teachers: A description of why and how. Peabody Journal of Education, 64, 131-150.
24. Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Stenhouse, L. (1983). Authority, education and emancipation. London: Heinemann.
26. Zeichner, K. M. (1993). Action research: Personal renewal and social reconstruction. Educational Action Research, 1, 199-219.
27. Zeichner, K. M., & Gore, J. M. (1995). Using action research as a vehicle for student teacher reflection: A social reconstructionist approach. In S. E. Noffke & R. B. Stevenson (Eds.), Educational action research: Becoming practically critical (pp. 13-30). New York: Teachers College Press.