Lie-biased decision making in prison

Communication Reports

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 9-19

  Bond, Gary D ^a   Malloy, Daniel M ^a   Arias, Elizabeth A ^a   Nunn, Shannon N ^a   Thompson, Laura A ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Context; Deception; Lie bias; Prison; Reversed Veracity Effect

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044435384     PISSN: 08934215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08934210500084180     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, D. E., Ansfield, M. E., & DePaulo, B. M. (1999). Love's best habit: Deception in the context of relationships. In P. Philippot, R. S. Feldman, & E. J. Coats (Eds.), The social context of nonverbal behavior. Studies in emotion and social interaction (pp. 372-409). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Buller, D. B., Strzyzewski, K. D., & Hunsaker, F. G. (1991). Interpersonal deception: II. The inferiority of conversational participants as deception detectors. Communication Monographs, 58 (1), 25-40.
3. CBS News, (Producers). (1997). Stalkers: Against the Law [Motion picture].
4. Chen, Y., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2000). Unwanted thought: Age differences in the correction of social judgments. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 475-482.
5. Cosgrove, J. (Exec. Producer) & Meurer, T. D. (Exec. Producer). (2001). Inside the Minds of Criminal Profilers [Motion picture]. The Learning Channel, High Road Films.
6. DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1 (4), 346-357.
7. Films for the Humanities & Sciences, Producer. (1999a). Issues in journalism: The press and the Clinton allegations, a case study. [videorecording]. (Available from Films for the Humanities & Sciences).
8. Films for the Humanities & Sciences, Producer. (1999b). Issues in journalism: Ratings vs. journalism: Going live with breaking news, [videorecording]. (Available from Films for the Humanities & Sciences).
9. Garrido, E., & Masip, J. (2001). Previous exposure to the sender's behavior and accuracy at judging credibility. In R. Roesch, R. R. Corrado, & R. Dempster (Eds.), Psychology in the courts: International advances in knowledge (pp. 271-287). London: Routledge.
10. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46(2), 107-119.
11. Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., & Malone, P. S. (1993). You can't not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (2), 221-233.
12. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. ( 1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Oxford: Wiley.
13. Hubbell, A. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Gee, J. C. (2001). The relative effects of timing of suspicion and outcome involvement on biased message processing. Communication Monographs, 68 (2), 115-132.
14. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (1991). The dark side of trust: Conceptualizing and measuring types of communicative suspicion. Communication Quarterly, 4, 325-340.
16. Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (1992). Linking love and lies: A formal test of the McCornack and Parks model of deception detection. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9 (1), 143-154.
17. Levine, T. R., & McCornack, S. A. (2001). Behavioral adaptation, confidence, and heuristic-based explanations of the probing effect. Human Communication Research, 27 (4), 471-502.
18. Levine, T. R., Park, H. S., & McCornack, S. A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the Veracity effect'. Communication Monographs, 66, 125-144.
19. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory of social science. New York: Harper and Brothers.
20. McCornack, S. A., & Levine, T. R. (1990). When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception. Communication Monographs, 57 (3), 219-230.
21. O'Sullivan, M., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1988). The effect of comparisons on detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12(3,Pt. 1),203-215.
22. Park, H. S., & Levine, T. R. (2001). A probability model of accuracy in deception detection experiments. Communication Monographs, 68 (2), 201-210.
23. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Rossi, J. S. (1985). Tables of effect size for z score tests of differences between proportions and between correlation coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 737-743.
25. Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35 (4), 657-665.
26. Stiff, J. B., Kim, H. J., & Ramesh, C. N. (1992). Truth-biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, 19, 326-345.
27. Toris, C., & DePaulo, B. M. (1985). Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (5), 1063-1073.
28. Vrij, A., & Baxter, M. (1999). Accuracy and confidence in detecting truth and lies in elaborations and denials: Truth-bias, lie-bias and individual differences. Expert Evidence, 7(1), 25-36.