Generalized strain probing of constitutive models

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics

Volumn 28, Issue 15, 2004, Pages 1503-1519

  Hashash, Youssef M A ^a   Fu, Qingwei ^a   Butkovich, Jeremy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Constitutive models; Elasto plasticity; Neural network; Probing; Soil behaviour; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; HARDENING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; SOILS; STRAIN;

COMPLEX SOILS; HYPERSPHERICAL STRAIN PROBE (HSP); TRUE TRIAXIAL STRAIN PROBE (TTSP);

GEOPHYSICS;

CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION; SOIL MECHANICS; STRAIN ANALYSIS;

EID: 10944243911     PISSN: 03639061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nag.397     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hill R. The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity. Oxford engineering science series, vol. ix. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1950; 356.
2. Roscoe KH, Burland JB. On the generalized stress-strain behaviour of 'wet' clay. In Engineering Plasticity, Heyman J (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England, 1968; 535-609.
3. Dafalias YF. The concept and application of the bounding surface in plasticity theory. In IUTAM Symposium on Physical Non-linearities in Structural Analysis, France, 1980; 56-63.
4. Prevost JH, Popescu R. Constitutive relations for soil materials. Electronic Journal for Geotechnical Engineering 1996; 1.
5. Whittle AJ, Kavadas MJ. Formulation of MIT-E3 constitutive model for overconsolidated clays. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1994; 120 (l):173-198.
6. Dikeman SU, Ghaboussi J. Effective stress analysis of seismic response and liquefaction: theory. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1984; 110 (5):628-644.
7. Elgamal A, Lai T, Yang Z, He L. Dynamic soil properties, seismic downhole arrays and applications in practice. 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, San Diego, California, USA, 2001.
8. Sidarta D, Ghaboussi J. Modelling constitutive behaviour of materials from non-uniform material tests. Computers and Geotechnics 1998; 22 (1).
9. Hashash YMA, Marulanda C, Ghaboussi J, Jung S. Systematic update of a deep excavation model using field performance data. Computers and Geotechnics 2003; 30:477-488.
10. Hashash YMA, Jung S, Ghaboussi J. Numerical implementation of a neural network based material model in finite element analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 59:989-1005.
11. Poorooshasb HB, Holubec I, Sherbourne AN. Yielding and flow of sand in triaxial compression: part I. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1966; 3(4):179-190.
12. Tatsuoka F, Ishihara K. Yielding of sand in triaxial compression. Soils and Foundations 1974; 14 (2):63-76.
13. Anandarajah A, Sobhan K, Kuganenthira N. Incremental stress-strain behaviour of granular soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 1995; 121(1):57-68.
14. Lewin PI, Burland JB. Stress-probe experiments on saturated normally consolidated clay. Geotechnique 1970; 20 (1):38-56.
15. Graham J, Moonan ML, Lew KV. Yield states and stress-strain relationships in natural plastic clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 1983; 20:502-516.
16. Bardet JP. Numerical simulation of the incremental responses of idealized granular materials. International Journal of Plasticity 1994; 10(8):879-908.
17. Gudehus G, Kolymbas D. A constitutive law of the rate type for soils. 3rd International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Aachen, 1979; 319-329.
18. Gudehus G. Comparison of some constitutive laws for soils under radially symmetric loading and unloading. 3rd International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Aachen, 1979; 1309-1323.
19. Hashash YMA, Wotring D, Yao JI-C, Lee J-S, Fu Q. Visual framework for development and use of constitutive models. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2002; 26 1493-1513.
20. Bourke P, Sphere generation, 1992.
21. Simo JC, Hughes TJR. General return mapping algorithms for rate-independent plasticity. In Constitutive Laws for Engineering Materials: Theory and Applications, Desai CS (ed.). Elsevier: Tucson, Arizona, 1987; 221-231.
22. Hashash YMA, Whittle AJ. Integration of modified Cam Clay model in non-linear finite element analysis. Computers and Geotechnics 1992; 14(2):59-83.
23. Hashash YMA, Yao JI-C, Wotring D. Glyph and hypersteamline representation of stress and strain tensors and material constitutive response. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2003; 27:603-626.
24. Hashash YMA. Analysis of Deep Excavations in Clay. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, 1992; 337.
25. Ghaboussi J, Garret JH, Wu X. Knowledge-based modeling of material behaviour with neural networks. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division 1991; 117(1):132-153.
26. Ghaboussi J, Sidarta DE. New method of material modeling using neural networks. 6th International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics 1997; 393-400.
27. Ghaboussi J, Sidarta D. A new nested adaptive neural network for modeling of constitutive behaviour of materials. Computer and Geotechnics 1998; 22(1):29-52.
28. Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Zhang M, Haj-Ali R. Autoprogressive training of neural network constitutive models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998; 42(1):105-126.
29. Hashash YMA, Whittle AJ. Mechanisms of load transfer and arching for braced excavations in clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2002; 128(3):187-197.