On the analyses of mixture vapor pressure data: The hydrogen peroxide/water system and its excess thermodynamic functions

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 24, 2004, Pages 6540-6557

  Manatt, Stanley L ^a,b   Manatt, Margaret R R ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b K 2 Technical Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrogen peroxide; Liquid mixture vapor pressures; Phase equilibria; Thermodynamics; Water chemistry

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; MIXTURES; THERMAL EFFECTS;

ENERGY EXPANSION; REDLICH-KISTER APPROACH; VAPOR PRESSURES;

VAPOR PRESSURE;

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DATA ANALYSIS; ENERGY TRANSFER; ENTHALPY; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; HYDRODYNAMICS; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THERMODYNAMICS; VAPOR PRESSURE;

EID: 10944237347     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200400104     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. S. Uchida, S. Ogawa, M. Yamaguchi, Japan Sci. Rev., Eng. Sci. 1950, 1, No. 2, 41-49 (in English).
2. See for example: a) L. F. Keyser, J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3439-3446; b) J. J. Lamb, L. T. Molina, C. A. Smith, M. J. Molina, J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 4467-4470; c) S. P. Sander, J. Phy. Chem. 1984, 88, 6018-6021; d) G. L. Vaghjiani, A. R. Ravishankara, N. Cohen, J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 7833-7837.
3. See for example: a) L. F. Keyser, J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3439-3446; b) J. J. Lamb, L. T. Molina, C. A. Smith, M. J. Molina, J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 4467-4470; c) S. P. Sander, J. Phy. Chem. 1984, 88, 6018-6021; d) G. L. Vaghjiani, A. R. Ravishankara, N. Cohen, J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 7833-7837.
4. See for example: a) L. F. Keyser, J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3439-3446; b) J. J. Lamb, L. T. Molina, C. A. Smith, M. J. Molina, J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 4467-4470; c) S. P. Sander, J. Phy. Chem. 1984, 88, 6018-6021; d) G. L. Vaghjiani, A. R. Ravishankara, N. Cohen, J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 7833-7837.
5. See for example: a) L. F. Keyser, J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3439-3446; b) J. J. Lamb, L. T. Molina, C. A. Smith, M. J. Molina, J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 4467-4470; c) S. P. Sander, J. Phy. Chem. 1984, 88, 6018-6021; d) G. L. Vaghjiani, A. R. Ravishankara, N. Cohen, J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 7833-7837.
6. A. L. Lane, S. P. Sander, Jet Propulsion Laboratory; personal communications.
7. J. M. Nicovich, P. H. Wine, J. Geophys. Res.[Atmos.] 1988, 93, 2417-2421.
8. a) R. W. Carlson, M. S. Anderson, R. E. Johnson, W. D. Smythe, A. R. Hendrix, C. A. Barth, L. A. Soderblom, T. B. McCord, J. B. Dalton, R. N. Clark, J. H. Shirley, A. C. Ocampo, D. L. Matson, Science 1999, 283, 2062-2064;
9. b) J. F. Cooper, R. E. Johnson, B. H. Mauk, H. B. Garrett, N. Gehsels, Icarus 2001, 149, 133-159.
10. a) G. Scatchard, C. L. Raymond, H. H. Gilman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 1275-1278;
11. b) G. Scatchard, C. L. Raymond, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 1278-1287;
12. c) G. Scatchard, S. E. Wood, J. M. Mochel, J. Phys. Chem. 1939, 43, 119-130;
13. d) G. Scatchard, S. E. Wood, J. M. Mochel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 3206-3210;
14. e) G. Scatchard, S. E. Wood, J. M. Mochel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62, 712-716;
15. f) G. Scatchard, S. E. Wood, J. M. Mochel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1946, 68, 1957-1960;
16. g) G. Scatchard, S. E. Wood, J. M. Mochel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1946, 68, 1960-1963;
17. h) G. Scatchard, G. M. Kavanagh, L. B. Ticknor, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 3715-3720;
18. i) G. Scatchard, L. B. Ticknor, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 3724-3729;
19. j) G. Scatchard, F. G. Satkiewiez, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 130-133;
20. k) G. Scatchard, G. M. Wilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 133-137.
21. W. C. Schumb, C. N. Satterfield, R. L. Wentworth, Hydrogen Peroxide, ACS Monograph Series, Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York, 1956, pp. 221-231.
22. G. M. Kavanagh, PhD thesis, MIT (USA), 1949.
23. FMC, Technical Bulletin 67.
24. M. F. Easton, A. G. Mitchell, W. F. K. Wynne-Jones, Trans. Faraday Soc. 1952, 48, 796-801.
25. L. Haar, J. S. Gallagher, G. S. Kell, NBS/NRC Steam Tables, Hemiphere Publishing Corp., New York, 1984.
26. a) C. Tsonopoulos, AIChE J. 1974, 20, 263-272:
27. b) C. Tsonopoulos, J. L. Heidman, Fluid Phase Equilib. 1990, 57(3), 261-276.
28. O. Maass, P. G. Hiebert, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1924, 46, 2693-2700.
29. O. Redlich, A. T. Kister, Ind. Eng. Chem. 1948, 40, 345-348.
30. For example, see J. M. Prausnitz, R. N. Lichtenthaler, E. G. de Azevedo, Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid-Phase Equilibria, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1999, pp. 225-264.
31. For other texts see: a) E. Hala, J. Pick, V. Fried, O. Vilim, Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1967; b) H. C. Van Ness, M. M. Abbott, Classical Thermodynamics of Nonelectrolyte Solutions with Applications to Phase Equilibria, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982; c) J. S. Rowlinson, F. L. Swinton, Liquid and Liquid Mixtures, 3rd ed., Butterworth Scientific, London, 1982.
32. For other texts see: a) E. Hala, J. Pick, V. Fried, O. Vilim, Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1967; b) H. C. Van Ness, M. M. Abbott, Classical Thermodynamics of Nonelectrolyte Solutions with Applications to Phase Equilibria, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982; c) J. S. Rowlinson, F. L. Swinton, Liquid and Liquid Mixtures, 3rd ed., Butterworth Scientific, London, 1982.
33. For other texts see: a) E. Hala, J. Pick, V. Fried, O. Vilim, Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1967; b) H. C. Van Ness, M. M. Abbott, Classical Thermodynamics of Nonelectrolyte Solutions with Applications to Phase Equilibria, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982; c) J. S. Rowlinson, F. L. Swinton, Liquid and Liquid Mixtures, 3rd ed., Butterworth Scientific, London, 1982.
34. See: H. C. Van Ness, M. M. Abbott, Classical Thermodynamics of Nonelectrolyte Solutions with Applications to Phase Equilibria, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982, pp. 200-202.
35. G. M. Wilson, PhD thesis, MIT (USA), 1953, p 56.
36. E, the RT must be Tx82.0578/41.2925, while RT for the imperfect gas correction terms is 760xTx 82.0518.
37. F. G. Keyes, J. Chem. Phys. 1947, 15, 602-612.
38. Calculated from an equation given by: F. G. Keyes, L. B. Smith, H. T. Gerry, Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 1936, 70, 319-364.
39. W. Attempts to incorporate the two required VP-T equations along with Equation (5) proved too cumbersome and appeared to exceed the capability of the nonlinear curve fitting script language in "Version 3" of "PSI-Plot."
40. S. P. Vango, S. L. Manatt, unpublished work carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.
41. [6h,8]
42. i)]/P.
43. a) C. Antoine, Compt. Rend. 1888, 107, 1143-1145;
44. b) See also: G. W. Thomson, Chem. Rev. 1946, 46, 1-39.
45. HP as a parameter and T iteration). Results similar to those from a three parameter Redlich-Kister treatment were obtained for the goodness of fit for the "60" and "75" degree data, but the fit for the "90" degree data was poor and the values for the pure hydrogen peroxide vapor pressures for the "75" and "90" degree experimental data were substantially different, 38.98 and 79.24 mm Hg, respectively, from those (see Table 3) from the three-parameter Redlich-Kister treatment.
46. W. Ramsay, S. Young, Philos. Mag. 1886, 21(5), 33-51.
47. G. M. Wilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 127-130.
48. P. A. Giguère, O. Maass, Can. J. Res. 1940, 18B, 181-193.
49. These same authors presented data at 45 and 60°C but they had serious reservations about its quality as they were plagued by decomposition. Calculations using the parameters derived in the present work gave results in very poor agreement with these latter data sets which seems to confirm the serious experimental problems these authors had at these two temperatures. Our parameters at 60°C should certainly be correct because of the good fit to the data of references [6h,8].
50. F. G. Keys, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 1761-1764.
51. See Reference [15] pp. 104-113.
52. E. A. Guggenheim, J. Chem. Phys. 1945, 13, 253-261.
53. G. W. Castellan, Physical Chemistry, Addison-Wesley, Palo Alto 1964, pp. 41-43.
54. C. F. Curtiss, J. O. Hirschfelder, J. Chem. Phys. 1942, 10, 491-496.
55. G. S. Kell, G. E. McLaurin, E. Whalley, J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 48, 3805-3813.
56. [11] (old steam equation, 70.034, 149.400, 289.100, 525.724, and 905.700 mm Hg versus new, 70.039, 149.447, 289.307, 526.380, and 907.443 mm Hg) affect the goodness of fit significantly as the water vapor pressures multiply the exponentials of the excess energy terms. The differences in temperature discussed here, however, become unimportant because, as discussed above, the average temperature of a suite of mixtures vapor pressure measurements of different mole fractions made at a particular heater setting dictated by a particular EMF setting can be determined in the fit to the mixture vapor pressure data.
57. For the Lorentzian and sigmoid curves four parameters are required to be determined from only three data points. The following iterative procedure was used with "PSI-Plot": two parameters were guessed and two parameters were fit to the three data points; in the next stage the fit parameters were input and two parameters guessed originally were fit; repetition of this procedure, while monitoring the least square residuals and the parameters, was stopped when the parameters were unchanged in the sixth decimal place.
58. i values are given in reference [15], pp. 236-237.
59. See for example: L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 2nd ed., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1948, pp. 301-304 and p. 333.
60. [6b] Possibly the reason it works for the latter data is because there were several measurements for mole fraction greater than 0.9 for both components.
61. [6b] were noted. In Table 1 of the thesis the EMF in run #3 should be 0.035814 v and the temperature should be 44.599°C; the pressures in runs 7 and 8 should be 394.711 and 354.182 mm Hg, respectively; in Table 2 the mole fraction at 60°C of 0.1577 should have a pressure 26.21 mm Hg and the fourth mole fraction should be 0.4221; in reference [7] in Table 16 the mole fraction at 60°C of 0.8423 should have a pressure of 26.21 mmHg and the eighth mole fraction at 75°C should be 0.7460; in reference [6h] the 44.50 and 105.00°C smoothed pressures should be 27.41 and 415.68 mm Hg, respectively.
62. W. C. Schumb, Ind. Eng. Chem. 1949, 41, 992-1003.
63. C. E. Huckaba, F. G. Keyes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 2578-2500.
64. For an extensive compilation of boiling points, critical constants, acentric factors, and other molecular constants, see: R. C. Reid, J. M. Prausnitz, B. E. Poling, The Properties of Gases & Liquids, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987, pp. 656-732.
65. a) K. S. Pitzer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 3427-3433;
66. b) K. S. Pitzer, D. Z. Lippman, R. F. Curl, C. M. Huggins, D. E. Peterson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 3433-3440.
67. M. T. Tyn, W. F. Calus, Processing 1975, 21, 16-17.
68. See: R. C. Reid, J. M. Prausnitz, B. E. Poling, The Properties of Gases & Liquids, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987, pp. 53-55