The patent system and the dynamics of innovation in Europe

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 449-456

  Foray, Dominique ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; WORLD;

EID: 10944222641     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154304781779732     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Arora, A, A Fosfuri and A Gambardella (2001), Markets for Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge MA).
2. Barton, J (2000), "Reforming the patent system", Science, 287 5460), pages 19330-1934.
3. Cockburn, I, and R Henderson (1997), "Public-private interaction and the productivity of pharmaceutical research", WP series, #6018, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
4. Cohen, W, R Florida, L Randazzese and J Walsh (1998), "Industry and the academy: uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance" , in R Noll (editor), Challenge to the Research University (Brookings Institution, Washington DC) pages 171-179.
5. Foray, D (2004), The Economics of Knowledge (MIT Press, Cambridge MA).
6. Hall, B (2001), "The global nature of intellectual property: discussion", draft, Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley, May.
7. Hall, B, and R Ziedonis (2001), "The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-1995", Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1), pages 101-128.
8. Heller, M, and R Eisenberg (1998), "Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research," Science, 280, pages 698-701.
9. Horward, A (2002), "The Community patent", in Patinnova (editor), Innovation/SMEs Programme(EC, DG-Enterprise, Luxembourg pages 123-138.
10. Jaffe, A (2000), "The US patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process", Research Policy, 29, pages 531-557.
11. MERIT (2000), Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy, a publication from the Innovation/SMEs programme; DG-Enterprise, EUR 17023 (European Commission, Luxembourg).
12. Mowery, D C, R R Nelson, B Sampat and A A Ziedonis (1999), "The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on US university research and technology transfer: an analysis of data from Columbia University, the University of California, and Stanford University", Working Paper, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.
13. Pooley, J (2002), "Changing times for the US patent system", Business Perspectives, Summer/Fall, available at .