Overstrength and ductility factors for steel frames designed according to BS 5950

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 129, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1019-1035

  Balendra, T ^a   Huang, X ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Ductility; Seismic design; Singapore; Steel frames

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKES; GRAVITATIONAL EFFECTS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES (CBFS); SEISMIC DESIGN; SINGAPORE; STEEL FRAMES;

STEEL STRUCTURES;

EID: 10844294410     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1019)     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Balendra, T., Lam, N. T. K., Wilson, J. L., and Kong, K. H. (2002). "Analysis of long-distance earthquake tremors and base shear demand for buildings in Singapore." Eng. Struct., 24(1), 99-108.
2. Balendra, T., Tan, K., and Kong, S. K. (1999). "Vulnerability of reinforced concrete frames in low seismic region, when designed according to BS 8110," Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28, 1361-1381.
3. British Standards Institution (BSI). (1972). "CP3: Code of basic data for the design of buildings Chapter V. Loading. Part 2. Wind loads." British Standards Institution, London.
4. British Standards Institution (BSI). (1990). "BS 5950: Structural use of steelwork in building. Part 1 1990." British Standards Institution, London.
5. Bruneau, M., Uang, C. M., and Whittaker, A. (1998). Ductile design of steel structures, McGraw-Hill, New York, 381-409.
6. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (1994). "Limit states design of steel structures." Standard CAN/CSA-SJ6,1-94 Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont., Canada.
7. Chen, W. F., Goto, Yoshiaki, and Liew, J. Y. R. (1996). Stability design of semi-rigid frames, Wiley, New York, 15-156.
8. Daali, M. L., and Korol, R. M. (1995). "Prediction of local buckling and rotation capacity at maximum moment." J. Constr. Steel Res., 32, 1-13.
9. Fajfar, P. (2000). "A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design." Earthquake Spectra, 16, 573-591.
10. Krawinkler, H. (1978). "Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of steel frames." Eng. J., 5(3), 82-91.
11. Mainstone, R. J. (1974). "Supplementary note on the stiffness and strengths of infilled frames." Current Paper CP 13/74, Building Research Station, Garston, Watford, U.K.
12. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). (1991). Recommended provision for the development of seismic regulations for new buildings, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, D.C.
13. Osman, A., Ghobarah, A., and Korol, R. M. (1995). "Implications of design philosophies for seismic response of steel moment frames." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 24, 127-143.
14. Osteraas, J. D., and Krawinkler, H. (1990). "Strength and ductility considerations in seismic design." Rep. 90, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
15. Priestley, M. J. N., and Elder, D. M. (1983). "Stress-strain curves for unconfined and confined concrete masonry." ACI J., 192-201.
16. Rahgozar, M. A., and Humar, J. L. (1998). "Accounting for overstrength in seismic design of steel structures." Can. J. Civ. Eng., 25, 1-5.
17. Standards Association of Australia (SAA). (1993). AS 1170.4: Minimum design loads on structures. 4: Earthquake loads, SAA, North Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia.
18. d factors for building seismic provisions." J. Struct. Eng., 117(1), 19-28.