Optimal experimental design in stochastic structural dynamics

Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 67-78

  Papadimitriou, C ^a   Haralampidis, Y ^a   Sobczyk, K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

^b INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Poland)

Author keywords

Evolution strategies; Kriging; Random vibrations; Sensor locations; Structures

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING; CORRELATION METHODS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; LINEAR SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SENSORS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EVOLUTION STRATEGIES; KRIGING; RANDOM VIBRATIONS; SENSOR LOCATIONS;

RANDOM PROCESSES;

EID: 10844289564     PISSN: 02668920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fedorov W. Theory of optimal experiments. New York: Academic Press; 1972.
2. Goodwin GC, Payne RL. Dynamic system identification: experiment design and data analysis. London: Academic Press; 1977.
3. Yu TK, Seinfeld JH. Observability and optimal measurement location in linear distributed parameter systems. Int J Control 1973;18(4):785-99.
4. Bensoussan A. Optimization of sensor location in a distributed filtering problem. Proceedings of International Symposium on Stability of Stochastic Dynamic Systems. Lecture Notes in Math. 294. Berlin: Springer; 1971 p. 62-84.
5. Shah P, Udwadia FE. A methodology for optimal sensor locations for identification of dynamic systems. J Appl Mech 1978;45:188-96.
6. Kirkegaard PH, Brincker R. On the optimal locations of sensors for parametric identification of linear structural systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 1994;8:639-47.
7. Yuen KV, Katafygiotis LS, Papadimitriou C, Mickleborough NC. Optimal sensor placement methodology for identification with unmeasured excitation. J Dyn Syst Measur Contr 2001;123(4):677-86.
8. Papadimitriou C, Beck JL, Au S K. Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural model updating. J Vibrat Contr 2000;6(5):781-800.
9. Sobczyk K. Information dynamics: premises, challenges and results. Mech Syst Signal Process 2001;15(3):475-98.
10. Coble RG, Liebst BS. Sensor location and structural damage localization using minimal sensor information. AIAA J 1996;35(2):369-74.
11. Metallidis P, Verros G, Natsiavas S, Papadimitriou C. Fault detection and optimal sensor location in vehicle suspensions. J Vibrat Contr 2003;9(3-4):337-59.
12. Shi ZY, Law SS, Zhang LM. Optimum sensor placement for structural damage detection. J Eng Mech 2000;126(11):1173-9.
13. Bolotin VV. Planning of vibro-measurements on randomly vibrating structures (in Russian) Izv. RSSSR Acad Sci: Mech Solids 1970;1:1.
14. Lin YK. Probabilistic theory of structural dynamics. New York: MacGraw-Hill; 1967.
15. Sobczyk K. Stochastic differential equations with applications to physics and engineering. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1991.
16. Sobczyk K, Kirkner DJ. Stochastic modelling of microstructures. Boston: Birkhäuser; 2001.
17. Benaroya H. Mechanical vibration: analysis, uncertainties, and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.
18. Beyer HG. The theory of evolution strategies. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
19. Schwefel HP, Rudolph G. Contemporary evolution strategies. In: Moran F, Moreno A, Merelo JJ, Chacon P, editors. In Proceedings of Third International Conference on Artificial Life. Berlin: Springer; 1995. p. 893-907.
20. Bäck T, Hoffmeister F, Schwefel HP. A survey of evolution strategies. In: Belew R, Booker L, editors. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1991. p. 2-9.