Optimal sensor placement methodology for identification with unmeasured excitation

Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Transactions of the ASME

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 677-686

  Yuen, Ka Veng ^a   Katafygiotis, Lambros S ^b   Papadimitriou, Costas ^c   Mickleborough, Neil C ^b  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

Author keywords

Ambient vibration; Health monitoring; Information entropy; Sensor placement; System identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037993801     PISSN: 00220434     EISSN: 15289028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.1410929     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. [1] Cobb, R. G., and Liebst, B. S., 1996, “Sensor location prioritization and structural damage localization using minimal sensor information,” AIAAJ., 35, No. 2, pp. 369-374.
2. Hemez, F. M., and Farhat, C., 1994, “An energy based optimum sensor placement criterion and its application to structural damage detection,” Proc. 12th IMAC, Society of Experimental Mechanics, Honolulu, pp. 1568-1575.
3. Heredia-Zavoni, E., Montes-Iturrizaga, R., and Esteva, L., 1999, “Optimal instrumentation of structures on flexible base for system identification,” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28, No. 12, pp. 1471-1482.
4. Shi, Z. Y., Law, S. S., and Zhang, L. M., 2000, “Optimum sensor placement for structural damage detection,” J. Eng. Mech., 126, No. 11, pp. 1173-1179.
5. Udwadia, F. E., 1994, “Methodology for optimal sensor locations for parameters identification in dynamic systems,” J. Eng. Mech., 120, No. 2, pp. 368-390.
6. Heredia-Zavoni, E., and Esteva, L., 1998, “Optimal instrumentation of uncertain structural systems subject to earthquake motions,” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27, pp. 343-362.
7. Papadimitriou, C., Beck, J. L., and Au, S. K., 2000, “Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural model updating,” J. Vib. Control, 6, No. 5, pp. 781-800.
8. Jaynes, E. T., 1978, Where do we stand on maximum entropy? MIT Press, Cambridge.
9. Conte, J. P., and Krishnan, S., 1995, “Modal identification method for structures subjected to unmeasured random excitations,” Proceedings of the 10th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Specialty Conference, pp. 1296-1299, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, May.
10. Yuen, K.-V., and Katafygiotis, L. S., 2001, “Bayesian time-domain approach for modal updating using ambient data,” Probab. Eng. Mech., 16, No. 3, pp. 219-231.
11. Katafygiotis, L. S., and Yuen, K.-V, 2001, “Bayesian spectral density approach for modal updating using ambient data,” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30, No. 8, pp. 1103-1123.
12. Beck, J. L., and Katafygiotis, L. S., 1998, “Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework,” J. Eng. Mech., 124, No. 4, pp. 455-461.
13. Yuen, K.-V., 1999, “Structural modal identification using ambient dynamic data,” MPhil thesis, Technical report, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.
14. Krishnaiah, P. R., 1976, “Some recent developments on complex multivariate distributions,” J. Multivariate Anal., 6, pp. 1-30.
15. Goldberg, D. E., 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Allison Wesley.
16. Papadimitriou, C., Beck, J. L., and Katafygiotis, L. S., 1997, “Asymptotic expansions for reliability and moments of uncertain systems,” J. Eng. Mech., 123, No. 12, pp. 1219-1229.
17. Katafygiotis, L. S., Papadimitriou, C., and Yuen, K.-V., 1999, “An optimal sensor location methodology for designing cost-effective modal experiments,” EURODYN'99, pp. 617-622, Prague, Czech Republic.
18. Katafygiotis, L. S., Lam, H. F., and Papadimitriou, C., 2000, “Treatment of un identifiability in structural model updating,” Adv. Struct. Eng., 3, No. 1, pp. 19-39.