Mandarin speech perception in nucleus CI 24 implantees using MAPs based on neural response telemetry

ORL

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 255-261

  Sun, Yu Sheng ^a,b   Wu, Che Ming ^b   Liu, Tien Chen ^a,c  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF NURSING AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; Mandarin; Neural response telemetry

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LANGUAGE; MALE; NOISE; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TELEMETRY; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BEHAVIOR; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TELEMETRY;

EID: 10844274615     PISSN: 03011569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000081122     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler RS, Kelsay DMR, Gantz BJ, Woodworth GP: Cochlear implant use by prelingually deafened children: The influences of age of implant and length of device use. J Speech Hear Res 1997;40:183-199.
2. Miyamoto RT, Svirsky MA, Robbins AM: Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol 1997;117:15-17.
3. Tylor RS, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay DMR, Gantz BJ, Woodworth GP, Parkinson A: Speech perception by prelingually deaf children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:180-187.
4. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver AA, Gervais JP: The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus CI24M speech processor: Data from adults. Ear Hear 2000;21:151-163.
5. Novy S, Cheshire I: Using intra-operative NRT (Neural Response Telemetry) to set initial MAP parameters with Nucleus 24 and Nucleus 24k cochlear implant systems. Presentation at the Nucleus European Satellite Symposium Paediatric CI Conference, February 2002, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria.
6. Murray B, Knight M, Davies M, Giles E, Van de Heynin P, Akdas F, Whiteford L, Cafareli DD, Van de Honert C: Investigation of an NRT based fitting procedure using high rates of stimulation - A multicenter investigation. Paper presented at the 5th European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, Antwerp, Belgium, June 2000.
7. Seyle K, Brown CJ: Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear Hear 2002;23(suppl):72-79.
8. Liu T, Hsu CJ, Horng MJ: Mandarin tone detection in subjects with hearing impairment. Audiology 2000;39:106-109.
9. Zhang H, Zhao KL, Wang ZZ: MAC: Chinese Minimal Auditory Capability Test (Beijing Union Hospital, Beijing, P, R. China) 1988.
10. Smoorenburg GF, Witlleboer C, Van Dijk JE: Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Audiol Neurootol 2002;7:335-347.
11. Hughes ML, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Wolaver AA, Gervais JP: Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: Data from children. Ear Hear 2000;21:164-174.
12. Zeng FG, Galvin J: Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear 1999;20:60-74.
13. Lippmann RP: Accurate consonant perception without mid-frequence speech energy. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 1996;4:66-69.
14. Kasturi K, Loizou P, Dorman M, Spahr T: The intelligibility of speech with holes in the spectrum. J Acous Soc Am 2002;112:1102-1111.
15. Shannon RV: The relative importance of amplitude, temporal, and spectral cues for cochlear implant processor design Am J Audiol 2002;11:124-127.