Sex and experience in the academy award nomination process

Psychological Reports

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 589-592

  Lincoln, Anne E ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 10844244694     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.95.2.589-592     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. ALLEN, M. P., & LINCOLN, A. E. (2004) Critical discourse and the cultural consecration of American films. Social Forces, 82, 871-894.
2. ALLISON, P. D. (1995) Survival analysis using the SAS system: a practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
3. CLEVES, M. A., GOULD, W. W., & GUTIERREZ, R. G. (2002) An introduction to survival analysis using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Corp.
4. GILBEHG, M., & HINES, T. (2000) Male entertainment award winners are older than female winners. Psychological Reports, 86, 175-178.
5. KATZ, E. (1998) The film encyclopedia. New York: Harper Perennial.
6. LEVY, E. (1990) Stage, sex and suffering: images of women in American films. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8, 53-76.
7. LINCOLN, A. E., & ALLEN, M. P. (2004) Double jeopardy in Hollywood: age and gender in the careers of film actors, 1926-1999. Sociological Forum, 19, 3.
8. MARKSON, E. W., & TAYLOR, C. A. (1993) Real versus reel world: older women and the Academy Awards. Women & Therapy, 14, 157-172.